Literature DB >> 32133586

The neural bases of cognitive emotion regulation: The roles of strategy and intensity.

Craig A Moodie1, Gaurav Suri2, Dustin S Goerlitz3, Maria A Mateen4, Gal Sheppes5, Kateri McRae6, Shreya Lakhan-Pal7, Ravi Thiruchselvam8, James J Gross9.   

Abstract

When confronted with unwanted negative emotions, individuals use a variety of cognitive strategies for regulating these emotions. The brain mechanisms underlying these emotion regulation strategies have not been fully characterized, and it is not yet clear whether these mechanisms vary as a function of emotion intensity. To address these issues, 30 community participants (17 females, 13 males, Mage = 24.3 years) completed a picture-viewing emotion regulation task with neutral viewing, reacting to negative stimuli, cognitive reappraisal, attentional deployment, and self-distancing conditions. Brain and behavioral data were simultaneously collected in a 3T GE MRI scanner. Findings indicated that prefrontal regions were engaged by all three regulation strategies, but reappraisal showed the least amount of increase in activity as a function of intensity. Overall, these results suggest that there are both brain and behavioral effects of intensity and that intensity is useful for probing strategy-specific effects and the relationships between the strategies. Furthermore, while these three strategies showed significant overlap, there also were specific strategy-intensity interactions, such as frontoparietal control regions being preferentially activated by reappraisal and self-distancing. Conversely, self-referential and attentional regions were preferentially recruited by self-distancing and distraction as intensity increased. Overall, these findings are consistent with the notion that there is a continuum of cognitive emotion regulation along which all three of these strategies lie.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activation; Cognitive control; Emotion regulation; Intensity; Strategy; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32133586     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-020-00775-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  46 in total

1.  Neural correlates of conscious self-regulation of emotion.

Authors:  M Beauregard; J Lévesque; P Bourgouin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cognitive reappraisal of emotion: a meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Jason T Buhle; Jennifer A Silvers; Tor D Wager; Richard Lopez; Chukwudi Onyemekwu; Hedy Kober; Jochen Weber; Kevin N Ochsner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Neural correlates of attentional deployment within unpleasant pictures.

Authors:  Jamie Ferri; Joseph Schmidt; Greg Hajcak; Turhan Canli
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Common and differential neural networks of emotion regulation by Detachment, Reinterpretation, Distraction, and Expressive Suppression: a comparative fMRI investigation.

Authors:  Denise Dörfel; Jan-Peter Lamke; Falk Hummel; Ullrich Wagner; Susanne Erk; Henrik Walter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Using distraction to regulate emotion: insights from EEG theta dynamics.

Authors:  Andero Uusberg; Ravi Thiruchselvam; James J Gross
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 6.  Functional imaging studies of emotion regulation: a synthetic review and evolving model of the cognitive control of emotion.

Authors:  Kevin N Ochsner; Jennifer A Silvers; Jason T Buhle
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 7.  Capacity and tendency: A neuroscientific framework for the study of emotion regulation.

Authors:  Jennifer A Silvers; João F Guassi Moreira
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Age Differences in Emotion Regulation Choice: Older Adults Use Distraction Less Than Younger Adults in High-Intensity Positive Contexts.

Authors:  Bruna Martins; Gal Sheppes; James J Gross; Mara Mather
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology.

Authors:  J J Gross
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-01

10.  Emotion regulation choice: the role of environmental affordances.

Authors:  Gaurav Suri; Gal Sheppes; Gerald Young; Damon Abraham; Kateri McRae; James J Gross
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2017-09-01
View more
  6 in total

1.  Meditation reduces brain activity in the default mode network in children with active cancer and survivors.

Authors:  Aneesh Hehr; Allesandra S Iadipaolo; Austin Morales; Cindy Cohen; Jeffrey W Taub; Felicity W K Harper; Elimelech Goldberg; Martin H Bluth; Christine A Rabinak; Hilary A Marusak
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.838

2.  Associating Flexible Regulation of Emotional Expression With Psychopathological Symptoms.

Authors:  Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla; Denise Dörfel; Miriam Becke; Janina Trefz; George A Bonanno; Sergiu Groppa
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.617

3.  Neural Indices of Emotion Regulatory Implementation Correlate With Behavioral Regulatory Selection: Proof-of-Concept Investigation.

Authors:  Naomi B Fine; Naama Schwartz; Talma Hendler; Tal Gonen; Gal Sheppes
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.617

4.  Neural activation during emotional interference corresponds to emotion dysregulation in stressed teachers.

Authors:  Samuel Fynes-Clinton; Chase Sherwell; Maryam Ziaei; Ashley York; Emma Sanders O'Connor; Kylee Forrest; Libby Flynn; Julie Bower; David Reutens; Annemaree Carroll
Journal:  NPJ Sci Learn       Date:  2022-04-20

5.  The VLPFC versus the DLPFC in Downregulating Social Pain Using Reappraisal and Distraction Strategies.

Authors:  Jun Zhao; Licheng Mo; Rong Bi; Zhenhong He; Yuming Chen; Feng Xu; Hui Xie; Dandan Zhang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Anxiety, not regulation tendency, predicts how individuals regulate in the laboratory: An exploratory comparison of self-report and psychophysiology.

Authors:  Daisy A Burr; Rachel G Pizzie; David J M Kraemer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.