Literature DB >> 24440597

Using distraction to regulate emotion: insights from EEG theta dynamics.

Andero Uusberg1, Ravi Thiruchselvam2, James J Gross2.   

Abstract

Distraction is a powerful and widely-used emotion regulation strategy. Although distraction regulates emotion sooner than other cognitive strategies (Thiruchselvam, Blechert, Sheppes, Rydstrom, & Gross, 2011), it is not yet clear whether it is capable of blocking the earliest stages of emotion generation. To address this issue, we capitalized on the excellent temporal resolution of EEG by focusing on occipital theta dynamics which were associated with distinct stages of visual processing of emotional stimuli. Individually defined theta band dynamics were extracted from a previously published EEG dataset (Thiruchselvam et al., 2011) in which participants attended to unpleasant (and neutral) images or regulated emotion using distraction and reappraisal. Results revealed two peaks within early theta power increase, both of which were increased by emotional stimuli. Distraction did not affect theta power during an early peak (150-350 ms), but did successfully decrease activity in a second peak (350-550 ms). These results suggest that although distraction acts relatively early in the emotion-generative trajectory, it does not block fast detection of emotional significance. Given that theta dynamics were uncorrelated with Late Positive Potential activity, the present results also encourage researchers to add the occipital theta to the growing toolkit of EEG-based measures of emotion regulation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distraction; EEG theta; Emotion regulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24440597     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2014.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  12 in total

1.  Recent Advances in Laboratory Assessment of Emotion Regulation.

Authors:  Saren H Seeley; Emmanuel Garcia; Douglas S Mennin
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2015-02-17

2.  EEG captures affective touch: CT-optimal touch and neural oscillations.

Authors:  Mariana von Mohr; Michael J Crowley; Jessica Walthall; Linda C Mayes; Kevin A Pelphrey; Helena J V Rutherford
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The neural bases of cognitive emotion regulation: The roles of strategy and intensity.

Authors:  Craig A Moodie; Gaurav Suri; Dustin S Goerlitz; Maria A Mateen; Gal Sheppes; Kateri McRae; Shreya Lakhan-Pal; Ravi Thiruchselvam; James J Gross
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  An emotional processing writing intervention and heart rate variability: the role of emotional approach.

Authors:  Saren H Seeley; Betina Yanez; Annette L Stanton; Michael A Hoyt
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2016-04-15

5.  Neural patterns during anticipation predict emotion regulation success for reappraisal.

Authors:  Elektra Schubert; James A Agathos; Maja Brydevall; Daniel Feuerriegel; Peter Koval; Carmen Morawetz; Stefan Bode
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  EEG time-frequency analysis reveals blunted tendency to approach and increased processing of unpleasant stimuli in dysphoria.

Authors:  Carola Dell'Acqua; Elisa Dal Bò; Tania Moretta; Daniela Palomba; Simone Messerotti Benvenuti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Savor the moment: Willful increase in positive emotion and the persistence of this effect across time.

Authors:  Kayla A Wilson; Annmarie MacNamara
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 4.348

8.  Emotion recognition based on EEG features in movie clips with channel selection.

Authors:  Mehmet Siraç Özerdem; Hasan Polat
Journal:  Brain Inform       Date:  2017-07-15

9.  Impact of emotional and motivational regulation on putting performance: a frontal alpha asymmetry study.

Authors:  Tai-Ting Chen; Kuo-Pin Wang; Ming-Yang Cheng; Yi-Ting Chang; Chung-Ju Huang; Tsung-Min Hung
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Electrophysiological Studies of Cognitive Reappraisal Success and Failure in aMCI.

Authors:  Shasha Xiao; Yingjie Li; Meng Liu; Yunxia Li
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.