Ross L Prentice1,2, Mary Pettinger1, Marian L Neuhouser1,2, Lesley F Tinker1, Ying Huang1,2, Cheng Zheng3, JoAnn E Manson4, Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani5, Garnet L Anderson1,2, Johanna W Lampe1,2. 1. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 2. School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Joseph J Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 4. Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We recently presented associations between serum-based biomarkers of carotenoid and tocopherol intake and chronic disease risk in a Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Measurement Precision subcohort (n = 5488). Questions remain as to whether self-reported dietary data can usefully augment such biomarkers or can be calibrated using biomarkers for reliable disease association estimation in larger WHI cohorts. OBJECTIVES: The aims were to examine the potential of FFQ data to explain intake variation in a WHI Feeding Study and to compare association parameter estimates and their precision from studies based on biomarker-calibrated FFQ intake in larger WHI cohorts, with those previously presented. METHODS: Serum-based intake measures were augmented by using FFQ data in a WHI Feeding Study (n = 153). Corresponding calibration equations were generated, both in a companion Nutritional Biomarker Study (n = 436) and in the previously mentioned subcohort (n = 5488), by regressing these intake measures on dietary data and participant characteristics, for α- and β-carotene, lutein plus zeaxanthin, and α-tocopherol. The supplemental value of FFQ data was considered by examining the fraction of feeding study intake variation explained by these regression models. Calibrated intake and disease association analyses were evaluated by comparisons with previously reported subcohort results. RESULTS: The inclusion of FFQ data led to some increases in feeding study intake variation explained (total R2 of ∼50%). Calibrated intake estimates explained 25-75% of serum-based intake variation, whether developed using either of the 2 cohort subsamples. Related disease associations for micronutrients were precisely estimated in larger WHI cohorts (n = 76,691) but were often closer to the null compared with previously reported associations. CONCLUSIONS: FFQ data may usefully augment blood concentrations in estimating the intake of carotenoids and tocopherols. Calibrated intake estimates using FFQ, dietary supplement, and participant characteristics only may require further justification to ensure reliable estimation of related disease associations.
BACKGROUND: We recently presented associations between serum-based biomarkers of carotenoid and tocopherol intake and chronic disease risk in a Women's Health Initiative (WHI) Measurement Precision subcohort (n = 5488). Questions remain as to whether self-reported dietary data can usefully augment such biomarkers or can be calibrated using biomarkers for reliable disease association estimation in larger WHI cohorts. OBJECTIVES: The aims were to examine the potential of FFQ data to explain intake variation in a WHI Feeding Study and to compare association parameter estimates and their precision from studies based on biomarker-calibrated FFQ intake in larger WHI cohorts, with those previously presented. METHODS: Serum-based intake measures were augmented by using FFQ data in a WHI Feeding Study (n = 153). Corresponding calibration equations were generated, both in a companion Nutritional Biomarker Study (n = 436) and in the previously mentioned subcohort (n = 5488), by regressing these intake measures on dietary data and participant characteristics, for α- and β-carotene, lutein plus zeaxanthin, and α-tocopherol. The supplemental value of FFQ data was considered by examining the fraction of feeding study intake variation explained by these regression models. Calibrated intake and disease association analyses were evaluated by comparisons with previously reported subcohort results. RESULTS: The inclusion of FFQ data led to some increases in feeding study intake variation explained (total R2 of ∼50%). Calibrated intake estimates explained 25-75% of serum-based intake variation, whether developed using either of the 2 cohort subsamples. Related disease associations for micronutrients were precisely estimated in larger WHI cohorts (n = 76,691) but were often closer to the null compared with previously reported associations. CONCLUSIONS: FFQ data may usefully augment blood concentrations in estimating the intake of carotenoids and tocopherols. Calibrated intake estimates using FFQ, dietary supplement, and participant characteristics only may require further justification to ensure reliable estimation of related disease associations.
Authors: J David Curb; Anne McTiernan; Susan R Heckbert; Charles Kooperberg; Janet Stanford; Michael Nevitt; Karen C Johnson; Lori Proulx-Burns; Lisa Pastore; Michael Criqui; Sandra Daugherty Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Ross L Prentice; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Ying Huang; Linda Van Horn; Shirley A A Beresford; Bette Caan; Lesley Tinker; Dale Schoeller; Sheila Bingham; Charles B Eaton; Cynthia Thomson; Karen C Johnson; Judy Ockene; Gloria Sarto; Gerardo Heiss; Marian L Neuhouser Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2011-07-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Rulla M Tamimi; Susan E Hankinson; Hannia Campos; Donna Spiegelman; Shumin Zhang; Graham A Colditz; Walter C Willett; David J Hunter Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-01-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Ross L Prentice; Mary Pettinger; Marian L Neuhouser; Lesley F Tinker; Ying Huang; Cheng Zheng; JoAnn E Manson; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Garnet L Anderson; Johanna W Lampe Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2019-04-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Cheng Zheng; Shirley A Beresford; Linda Van Horn; Lesley F Tinker; Cynthia A Thomson; Marian L Neuhouser; Chongzhi Di; JoAnn E Manson; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Rebecca Seguin; Todd Manini; Andrea Z LaCroix; Ross L Prentice Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2014-07-12 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Karen L Margolis; Robert Brzyski; Denise E Bonds; Barbara V Howard; Sarah Kempainen; Jennifer G Robinson; Monika M Safford; Lesley T Tinker; Lawrence S Phillips Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Ross L Prentice; Mary Pettinger; Marian L Neuhouser; Daniel Raftery; Cheng Zheng; G A Nagana Gowda; Ying Huang; Lesley F Tinker; Barbara V Howard; JoAnn E Manson; Robert Wallace; Yasmin Mossavar-Rahmani; Karen C Johnson; Johanna W Lampe Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2022-05-20 Impact factor: 5.363