Literature DB >> 32133494

The Origins of Anterograde Interference in Visuomotor Adaptation.

Gonzalo Lerner1, Scott Albert2, Pedro A Caffaro1, Jorge I Villalta1, Florencia Jacobacci1, Reza Shadmehr2, Valeria Della-Maggiore1.   

Abstract

Anterograde interference refers to the negative impact of prior learning on the propensity for future learning. There is currently no consensus on whether this phenomenon is transient or long lasting, with studies pointing to an effect in the time scale of hours to days. These inconsistencies might be caused by the method employed to quantify performance, which often confounds changes in learning rate and retention. Here, we aimed to unveil the time course of anterograde interference by tracking its impact on visuomotor adaptation at different intervals throughout a 24-h period. Our empirical and model-based approaches allowed us to measure the capacity for new learning separately from the influence of a previous memory. In agreement with previous reports, we found that prior learning persistently impaired the initial level of performance upon revisiting the task. However, despite this strong initial bias, learning capacity was impaired only when conflicting information was learned up to 1 h apart, recovering thereafter with passage of time. These findings suggest that when adapting to conflicting perturbations, impairments in performance are driven by two distinct mechanisms: a long-lasting bias that acts as a prior and hinders initial performance and a short-lasting anterograde interference that originates from a reduction in error sensitivity.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anterograde interference; error sensitivity; motor learning; state-space model; visuomotor adaptation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32133494      PMCID: PMC7264697          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  54 in total

1.  Learning-induced LTP in neocortex.

Authors:  M S Rioult-Pedotti; D Friedman; J P Donoghue
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-20       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  100 years of consolidation--remembering Müller and Pilzecker.

Authors:  H A Lechner; L R Squire; J H Byrne
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Modeling sensorimotor learning with linear dynamical systems.

Authors:  Sen Cheng; Philip N Sabes
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Daytime sleep condenses the time course of motor memory consolidation.

Authors:  Maria Korman; Julien Doyon; Julia Doljansky; Julie Carrier; Yaron Dagan; Avi Karni
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-12       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Functional stages in the formation of human long-term motor memory.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; T Brashers-Krug
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The influence of movement preparation time on the expression of visuomotor learning and savings.

Authors:  Adrian M Haith; David M Huberdeau; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Environmental consistency determines the rate of motor adaptation.

Authors:  Luis Nicolas Gonzalez Castro; Alkis M Hadjiosif; Matthew A Hemphill; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Electromyographic correlates of learning an internal model of reaching movements.

Authors:  K A Thoroughman; R Shadmehr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Motor learning interference is proportional to occlusion of LTP-like plasticity.

Authors:  Gabriela Cantarero; Byron Tang; Rebecca O'Malley; Rachel Salas; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Relevance of error: what drives motor adaptation?

Authors:  Kunlin Wei; Konrad Körding
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  6 in total

1.  Competition between parallel sensorimotor learning systems.

Authors:  Scott T Albert; Jihoon Jang; Shanaathanan Modchalingam; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Henriques; Gonzalo Lerner; Valeria Della-Maggiore; Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Learning the same motor task twice impairs its retention in a time- and dose-dependent manner.

Authors:  R Hamel; L Dallaire-Jean; É De La Fontaine; J F Lepage; P M Bernier
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Timescales of motor memory formation in dual-adaptation.

Authors:  Marion Forano; David W Franklin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Anterograde interference emerges along a gradient as a function of task similarity: A behavioural study.

Authors:  Raphaël Hamel; Jean-François Lepage; Pierre-Michel Bernier
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.698

5.  The effects of post-learning alcohol ingestion on human motor memory consolidation.

Authors:  Raphael Hamel; Olivier Demers; Jean-Francois Lepage; Pierre-Michel Bernier
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.698

6.  Interactions between sensory prediction error and task error during implicit motor learning.

Authors:  Jonathan S Tsay; Adrian M Haith; Richard B Ivry; Hyosub E Kim
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.779

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.