Literature DB >> 32132836

Biomechanical Analysis of Running Foot Strike in Shoes of Different Mass.

I-Lin Wang1, Ryan B Graham2, Eric J P Bourdon2, Yi-Ming Chen1, Chin-Yi Gu3, Li-I Wang4.   

Abstract

Different shoes and strike patterns produce different biomechanical characteristics that can affect injury risk. Running shoes are mainly designed as lightweight, minimal, or traditional cushioned types. Previous research on different shoes utilized shoes of not only different mass but also different shoe structures. However, it is unclear whether biomechanical changes during running in different shoe types with differing mass are the result of the structural design or the mass of the shoe. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of shoes of different mass on running gait biomechanics. Twenty male runners participated in this study. The experimental shoe masses used in this study were 175, 255, 335 and 415 g. The peak vertical ground reaction force increased with shoe mass (p < 0.05), but the strike index, ankle plantarflexion at initial contact, peak moment of the ankle during the stance phase, and initial contact angles of the lower extremity joints did not change. During the pre-activation phase, the integrated EMG data showed that the tibialis anterior muscle was the most activated with the 175 g and 415 g shoes (p < 0.05). During the push-off phase, the semitendinosus, lateral gastrocnemius and soleus muscles displayed higher activation with the heavier shoes (p < 0.05). The center of pressure also moves forward; resulting in mid foot striking. The lightest shoes might increase gastrocnemius muscle fatigue during the braking phase. The heaviest shoes could cause semitendinosus and triceps surae muscle fatigue during the push-off phase. Therefore, runners should consider their lower extremity joints, muscle adaptation and cushioning to remain in their preferred movement path. © Journal of Sports Science and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Running shoes; electromyography; injury prevention

Year:  2020        PMID: 32132836      PMCID: PMC7039018     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  30 in total

1.  Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running.

Authors:  B De Wit; D De Clercq; P Aerts
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Impact forces and muscle tuning: a new paradigm.

Authors:  B M Nigg; J M Wakeling
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.230

3.  Use of gait sandals for measuring rearfoot and shank motion during running.

Authors:  Andrew Barnes; Jonathan Wheat; Clare E Milner
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2010-04-03       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Fatigue and soft tissue vibration during prolonged running.

Authors:  Arash Khassetarash; Reza Hassannejad; Mir Mohammad Ettefagh; Vahid Sari-Sarraf
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Foot strike patterns of runners at the 15-km point during an elite-level half marathon.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hasegawa; Takeshi Yamauchi; William J Kraemer
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Acute effect of different minimalist shoes on foot strike pattern and kinematics in rearfoot strikers during running.

Authors:  Roberto Squadrone; Renato Rodano; Joseph Hamill; Ezio Preatoni
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  Kinematic and kinetic comparison of barefoot and shod running in mid/forefoot and rearfoot strike runners.

Authors:  M A Thompson; S S Lee; J Seegmiller; C P McGowan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Impact reduction during running: efficiency of simple acute interventions in recreational runners.

Authors:  Marlène Giandolini; Pierrick J Arnal; Guillaume Y Millet; Nicolas Peyrot; Pierre Samozino; Blaise Dubois; Jean-Benoît Morin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Effects of barefoot and barefoot inspired footwear on knee and ankle loading during running.

Authors:  Jonathan Sinclair
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2014-02-23       Impact factor: 2.063

10.  Differences in muscle activity between natural forefoot and rearfoot strikers during running.

Authors:  Jennifer R Yong; Amy Silder; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  3 in total

1.  Biomechanics of running: A special reference to the comparisons of wearing boots and running shoes.

Authors:  Alireza Shamsoddini; Mohammad Taghi Hollisaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Effects of the weight of shoes on calf muscle simulation.

Authors:  I-Lin Wang; Yi-Ming Chen; Ke-Ke Zhang; Ming Gou; Jia-Qi Li; Yu-Hong Jiang
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Effects of shoe weight on landing impact and side-to-side asymmetry.

Authors:  I-Lin Wang; Jin-Jiang Gao; Li-I Wang; Ke-Ke Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.