Literature DB >> 22875194

Impact reduction during running: efficiency of simple acute interventions in recreational runners.

Marlène Giandolini1, Pierrick J Arnal, Guillaume Y Millet, Nicolas Peyrot, Pierre Samozino, Blaise Dubois, Jean-Benoît Morin.   

Abstract

Running-related stress fractures have been associated with the overall impact intensity, which has recently been described through the loading rate (LR). Our purpose was to evaluate the effects of four acute interventions with specific focus on LR: wearing racing shoes (RACE), increasing step frequency by 10 % (FREQ), adopting a midfoot strike pattern (MIDFOOT) and combining these three interventions (COMBI). Nine rearfoot-strike subjects performed five 5-min trials during which running kinetics, kinematics and spring-mass behavior were measured for ten consecutive steps on an instrumented treadmill. Electromyographic activity of gastrocnemius lateralis, tibialis anterior, biceps femoris and vastus lateralis muscles was quantified over different phases of the stride cycle. LR was significantly and similarly reduced in MIDFOOT (37.4 ± 7.20 BW s(-1), -56.9 ± 50.0 %) and COMBI (36.8 ± 7.15 BW s(-1), -55.6 ± 29.2 %) conditions compared to NORM (56.3 ± 11.5 BW s(-1), both P < 0.001). RACE (51.1 ± 9.81 BW s(-1)) and FREQ (52.7 ± 11.0 BW s(-1)) conditions had no significant effects on LR. Running with a midfoot strike pattern resulted in a significant increase in gastrocnemius lateralis pre-activation (208 ± 97.4 %, P < 0.05) and in a significant decrease in tibialis anterior EMG activity (56.2 ± 15.5 %, P < 0.05) averaged over the entire stride cycle. The acute attenuation of foot-ground impact seems to be mostly related to the use of a midfoot strike pattern and to a higher pre-activation of the gastrocnemius lateralis. Further studies are needed to test these results in prolonged running exercises and in the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22875194     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-012-2465-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  39 in total

1.  Force platforms as ergometers.

Authors:  G A Cavagna
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 3.531

2.  Barefoot running.

Authors:  Brian J Krabak; Martin D Hoffman; Guillaume Y Millet; Gary P Chimes
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.298

3.  Foot strike patterns of recreational and sub-elite runners in a long-distance road race.

Authors:  Peter Larson; Erin Higgins; Justin Kaminski; Tamara Decker; Janine Preble; Daniela Lyons; Kevin McIntyre; Adam Normile
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.337

4.  Is EMG of the lower leg dependent on weekly running mileage?

Authors:  H Baur; A Hirschmüller; S Müller; M Cassel; F Mayer
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  Foot strike patterns of runners at the 15-km point during an elite-level half marathon.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hasegawa; Takeshi Yamauchi; William J Kraemer
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Effects of step rate manipulation on joint mechanics during running.

Authors:  Bryan C Heiderscheit; Elizabeth S Chumanov; Max P Michalski; Christa M Wille; Michael B Ryan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Barefoot-simulating footwear associated with metatarsal stress injury in 2 runners.

Authors:  Jeffrey Giuliani; Brendan Masini; Curtis Alitz; Brett D Owens
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.390

8.  Jumping improves hip and lumbar spine bone mass in prepubescent children: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R K Fuchs; J J Bauer; C M Snow
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Stress fractures: a review of 180 cases.

Authors:  P Brukner; C Bradshaw; K M Khan; S White; K Crossley
Journal:  Clin J Sport Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.638

10.  The effect of material characteristics of shoe soles on muscle activation and energy aspects during running.

Authors:  B M Nigg; D Stefanyshyn; G Cole; P Stergiou; J Miller
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  15 in total

1.  Barefoot running: does it prevent injuries?

Authors:  Kelly Murphy; Emily J Curry; Elizabeth G Matzkin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Biomechanical Analysis of Running Foot Strike in Shoes of Different Mass.

Authors:  I-Lin Wang; Ryan B Graham; Eric J P Bourdon; Yi-Ming Chen; Chin-Yi Gu; Li-I Wang
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Impact reduction through long-term intervention in recreational runners: midfoot strike pattern versus low-drop/low-heel height footwear.

Authors:  Marlène Giandolini; Nicolas Horvais; Yohann Farges; Pierre Samozino; Jean-Benoît Morin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  Fatigue associated with prolonged graded running.

Authors:  Marlene Giandolini; Gianluca Vernillo; Pierre Samozino; Nicolas Horvais; W Brent Edwards; Jean-Benoît Morin; Guillaume Y Millet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Differences in muscle activity between natural forefoot and rearfoot strikers during running.

Authors:  Jennifer R Yong; Amy Silder; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Running Footwear and Impact Peak Differences in Recreational Runners.

Authors:  Federico Roggio; Bruno Trovato; Marta Zanghì; Luca Petrigna; Gianluca Testa; Vito Pavone; Giuseppe Musumeci
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-26

7.  Acute changes in foot strike pattern and cadence affect running parameters associated with tibial stress fractures.

Authors:  Jennifer R Yong; Amy Silder; Kate L Montgomery; Michael Fredericson; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Running speed-induced changes in foot contact pattern influence impact loading rate.

Authors:  Bastiaan Breine; Philippe Malcolm; Samuel Galle; Pieter Fiers; Edward C Frederick; Dirk De Clercq
Journal:  Eur J Sport Sci       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 3.980

9.  Vertical Loading Rate Is Not Associated with Running Injury, Regardless of Calculation Method.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Schmida; Christa M Wille; Mikel R Stiffler-Joachim; Stephanie A Kliethermes; Bryan C Heiderscheit
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2022-03-22

10.  Effect of the Fatigue Induced by a 110-km Ultramarathon on Tibial Impact Acceleration and Lower Leg Kinematics.

Authors:  Marlene Giandolini; Philippe Gimenez; John Temesi; Pierrick J Arnal; Vincent Martin; Thomas Rupp; Jean-Benoit Morin; Pierre Samozino; Guillaume Y Millet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.