Literature DB >> 10673110

Biomechanical analysis of the stance phase during barefoot and shod running.

B De Wit1, D De Clercq, P Aerts.   

Abstract

This study investigated spatio-temporal variables, ground reaction forces and sagittal and frontal plane kinematics during the stance phase of nine trained subjects running barefoot and shod at three different velocities (3.5, 4.5, 5.5 m s(-1)). Differences between conditions were detected with the general linear method (factorial model). Barefoot running is characterized by a significantly larger external loading rate than the shod condition. The flatter foot placement at touchdown is prepared in free flight, implying an actively induced adaptation strategy. In the barefoot condition, plantar pressure measurements reveal a flatter foot placement to correlate with lower peak heel pressures. Therefore, it is assumed that runners adopt this different touchdown geometry in barefoot running in an attempt to limit the local pressure underneath the heel. A significantly higher leg stiffness during the stance phase was found for the barefoot condition. The sagittal kinematic adaptations between conditions were found in the same way for all subjects and at the three running velocities. However, large individual variations were observed between the runners for the rearfoot kinematics.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10673110     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00192-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  67 in total

1.  Effects of forefoot running on chronic exertional compartment syndrome: a case series.

Authors:  Angela R Diebal; Robert Gregory; Curtis Alitz; J Parry Gerber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-12

2.  Barefoot running: does it prevent injuries?

Authors:  Kelly Murphy; Emily J Curry; Elizabeth G Matzkin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Kinematic and electromyography analysis of submaximal differences running on a firm surface compared with soft, dry sand.

Authors:  Hugh C Pinnington; David G Lloyd; Thor F Besier; Brian Dawson
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  The biomechanical differences between barefoot and shod distance running: a systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan P L Hall; Christian Barton; Paul Remy Jones; Dylan Morrissey
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Athletic footwear, leg stiffness, and running kinematics.

Authors:  Mark Bishop; Paul Fiolkowski; Bryan Conrad; Denis Brunt; MaryBeth Horodyski
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2006 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Effects of muscular biopsy on the mechanics of running.

Authors:  Jean-Benoit Morin; Pierre Samozino; Léonard Féasson; André Geyssant; Guillaume Millet
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill.

Authors:  Nicolas Chambon; Nicolas Delattre; Nils Guéguen; Eric Berton; Guillaume Rao
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Effect of Acute Alterations in Foot Strike Patterns during Running on Sagittal Plane Lower Limb Kinematics and Kinetics.

Authors:  Kevin A Valenzuela; Scott K Lynn; Lisa R Mikelson; Guillermo J Noffal; Daniel A Judelson
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  Walking on your sensitive sole.

Authors:  Kristiaan D'Août
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Changes in lower extremity movement and power absorption during forefoot striking and barefoot running.

Authors:  D S Blaise Williams; Douglas H Green; Brian Wurzinger
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.