Literature DB >> 32128301

Predictors of Treatment Success Following Limited Discectomy With Annular Closure for Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Aleksandr V Krutko1, Abdugafur J Sanginov1, Evgenii S Baykov1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated bone-anchored annular closure to significantly reduce reherniation and reoperation rates after lumbar discectomy in patients with large annular defects. It is important to identify the prognostic factors that may be associated with successful treatment. This study aimed to identify predictors of treatment success in patients with lumbar disc herniation treated with limited microdiscectomy supplemented by a bone-anchored annular closure device (ACD).
METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of 133 consecutive patients with lumbar disc herniation treated with the ACD. Treatment success was defined as ≥24% improvement in visual analog scale (VAS) for back pain, ≥39% improvement in VAS leg pain, and ≥33% in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), with the raw ODI score ≤48. Success was calculated at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Potentially predictive outcomes included patient characteristics, operative data, and imaging outcomes, such as disc, facet, and end plate morphology. Logistic regression was used to determine the significant predictive factors for treatment success.
RESULTS: After 3, 6, and 12 months, 97 of 131 (74%), 104 of 129 (81%), and 112 of 126 (89%) patients, respectively, achieved the success criteria. At 3 months follow-up, a higher proportion of younger (17-40 years) versus older (41-65 years) patients met the success criteria (P = .025). On the basis of logistic regression, the following factors were significantly associated with treatment success at 1 or more of the follow-up time points: sex (male), lower body mass index, higher baseline pain and ODI scores, lower grade preoperative disc degeneration, and the absence of a postoperative complication. The rates of index-level recurrent herniation and reoperation were 1.5% and 3.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This real-world evidence supports a promising benefit-risk profile for augmenting limited microdiscectomy with a bone-anchored ACD and provides some insights into the patient populations that may have a greater chance of realizing significant improvements in pain and function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 (Cohort study). ©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  annular closure device; large annular defect; limited discectomy; lumbar disc herniation; treatment success

Year:  2020        PMID: 32128301      PMCID: PMC7043812          DOI: 10.14444/7005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  46 in total

1.  Annular closure in lumbar microdiscectomy for prevention of reherniation: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Claudius Thomé; Peter Douglas Klassen; Gerrit Joan Bouma; Adisa Kuršumović; Javier Fandino; Martin Barth; Mark Arts; Wimar van den Brink; Richard Bostelmann; Aldemar Hegewald; Volkmar Heidecke; Peter Vajkoczy; Susanne Fröhlich; Jasper Wolfs; Richard Assaker; Erik Van de Kelft; Hans-Peter Köhler; Senol Jadik; Sandro Eustacchio; Robert Hes; Frederic Martens
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: part 2: radiographic evaluation and correlation with clinical outcome.

Authors:  Martin Barth; Michael Diepers; Christel Weiss; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Effect of an Annular Closure Device (Barricaid) on Same-Level Recurrent Disk Herniation and Disk Height Loss After Primary Lumbar Discectomy: Two-year Results of a Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Gordan Grahovac; Duje Vukas; Milorad Vilendecic; Darko Ledic; Matthew J McGirt; Eugene J Carragee
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.876

4.  Morphology and Clinical Relevance of Vertebral Endplate Changes Following Limited Lumbar Discectomy With or Without Bone-anchored Annular Closure.

Authors:  Adisa Kuršumović; Jenny C Kienzler; Gerrit J Bouma; Richard Bostelmann; Michael Heggeness; Claudius Thomé; Larry E Miller; Martin Barth
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Clinical factors of importance for outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Katarina Silverplats; B Lind; B Zoëga; K Halldin; L Rutberg; M Gellerstedt; H Brisby
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Duration of leg pain as a predictor of outcome after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow up.

Authors:  O P Nygaard; R Kloster; T Solberg
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 7.  Impact of obesity on lumbar spinal surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Junming Cao; Lingde Kong; Fantao Meng; Yingze Zhang; Yong Shen
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 1.961

8.  Health-related quality of life in patients with surgically treated lumbar disc herniation: 2- and 7-year follow-up of 117 patients.

Authors:  Katarina Silverplats; Bengt Lind; Björn Zoega; Klas Halldin; Martin Gellerstedt; Lena Rutberg; Helena Brisby
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Post-lumbar discectomy reoperations that are associated with poor clinical and socioeconomic outcomes can be reduced through use of a novel annular closure device: results from a 2-year randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Peter Douglas Klassen; Wellington K Hsu; Frederic Martens; Jason A Inzana; Wimar A van den Brink; Michael W Groff; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2018-06-26

10.  Smoking Is an Independent Risk Factor of Reoperation Due to Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Stina Brogård Andersen; Elisabeth Corydon Smith; Christian Støttrup; Leah Y Carreon; Mikkel O Andersen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-09-12
View more
  4 in total

1.  A protocol for recruiting and analyzing the disease-oriented Russian disc degeneration study (RuDDS) biobank for functional omics studies of lumbar disc degeneration.

Authors:  Olga N Leonova; Elizaveta E Elgaeva; Tatiana S Golubeva; Alexey V Peleganchuk; Aleksandr V Krutko; Yurii S Aulchenko; Yakov A Tsepilov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Risk Factors for Failing to Reach a Minimal Clinically Important Difference Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression.

Authors:  Elliot D K Cha; Conor P Lynch; Cara E Geoghegan; Caroline N Jadczak; Shruthi Mohan; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2022-02-17

3.  Medical Data Analysis of Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients after Traditional Chinese Medicine Rehabilitation Intervention Lumbar Function Recovery.

Authors:  Liu Yan; Wang Chenni; Liu Fang
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Effect of Preoperative Parameters on Outcomes of Lumbar Microdiscectomy: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Dhanish Mehendiratta; Pratik Patel; Vivek Bhambhu; Kshitij Chaudhary; Samir Dalvie
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2022-08-24
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.