Literature DB >> 18303459

Two-year outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy versus microscopic sequestrectomy: part 2: radiographic evaluation and correlation with clinical outcome.

Martin Barth1, Michael Diepers, Christel Weiss, Claudius Thomé.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Single-center randomized prospective study at a university hospital.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess disc morphology radiologically 2 years after surgery in a cohort of prospectively randomized patients undergoing microdiscectomy (D) or microscopic sequestrectomy (S) to compare the results and to correlate this data with clinical outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Simple fragment excision in cases of herniated lumbar discs has been repeatedly reported as an alternative to standard microdiscectomy, and according to the literature clinical results of both techniques seem to be comparable. As sequestrectomy, however, avoids any additional damage to the disc, the fate of the intervertebral space over time may well differ between the 2 procedures and may potentially even have an impact on outcome. Respective postoperative radiological data are not available so far.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This radiological evaluation represents a 2-year follow-up study by magnetic resonance imaging of a previously reported cohort of 84 patients harboring lumbar disc herniations that were randomized to D and S in equal parts. Disc and nondisc characteristics such as disc desiccation, loss of disc height, and endplate changes plus form, size, and location of canal-compromising disc lesions were assessed by a blinded neuroradiologist. Pre- and postoperative radiological data were compared and correlated with clinical outcome.
RESULTS: There was a high incidence of relevant (>or=4 mm) postoperative protrusions/extrusions of 66% in group D and 68% in group S (NS). The presence of a protrusion/extrusion, however, did not correlate with low back pain or sciatica. Loss of disc height over time was more common in group D (63%) than in group S (38%; P < 0.05) and endplate degeneration also increased significantly more in group D (47 vs. 14% in group S; P < 0.01). A significant correlation was present between Modic type endplate changes and low back pain.
CONCLUSION: Nondiscal pathologies, in particular Modic type endplate changes, seem to play an important role in the etiology of unfavorable clinical outcome after surgery for disc herniations. Sequestrectomy demonstrated significantly less postoperative disc degeneration than standard microdiscectomy after 2 years and may thus represent an attractive treatment alternative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18303459     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816201a6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  46 in total

Review 1.  Modic changes: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Yue-Hui Zhang; Chang-Qing Zhao; Lei-Sheng Jiang; Xiao-Dong Chen; Li-Yang Dai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Prolapsed intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Jeremy Fairbank
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-05-27

3.  Predictors of new vertebral endplate signal (Modic) changes in the general population.

Authors:  Tue Secher Jensen; Per Kjaer; Lars Korsholm; Tom Bendix; Joan S Sorensen; Claus Manniche; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Endplate changes following discectomy: natural history and associations between imaging and clinical data.

Authors:  Bradley K Weiner; Milorad Vilendecic; Darko Ledic; Sandro Eustacchio; Peter Varga; Miro Gorensek; Joseph Fernandez-Moure; John A Hipp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Comparative analysis of the intervertebral disc signal and annulus changes between immediate and 1-year postoperative MRI after transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy and annuloplasty.

Authors:  Akaworn Mahatthanatrakul; Vit Kotheeranurak; Guang-Xun Lin; Jung-Woo Hur; Ho Jung Chung; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  [Operative options for failed back surgery syndrome].

Authors:  S M Krieg; B Meyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  What is the Rate of Revision Discectomies After Primary Discectomy on a National Scale?

Authors:  Sohrab S Virk; Ashish Diwan; Frank M Phillips; Harvinder Sandhu; Safdar N Khan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Minimum two-year follow-up of cases with recurrent disc herniation treated with microdiscectomy and posterior dynamic transpedicular stabilisation.

Authors:  Tuncay Kaner; Mehdi Sasani; Tunc Oktenoglu; Ahmet Levent Aydin; Ali Fahir Ozer
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2010-02-24

9.  Biomechanical testing of a polymer-based biomaterial for the restoration of spinal stability after nucleotomy.

Authors:  Aldemar A Hegewald; Sven Knecht; Daniel Baumgartner; Hans Gerber; Michaela Endres; Christian Kaps; Edgar Stüssi; Claudius Thomé
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Characteristics and natural course of vertebral endplate signal (Modic) changes in the Danish general population.

Authors:  Tue S Jensen; Tom Bendix; Joan S Sorensen; Claus Manniche; Lars Korsholm; Per Kjaer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.