| Literature DB >> 32123542 |
Stefano Campanaro1,2, Laura Treu1,3, Luis M Rodriguez-R4, Adam Kovalovszki3, Ryan M Ziels5, Irena Maus6, Xinyu Zhu3, Panagiotis G Kougias7, Arianna Basile1, Gang Luo8, Andreas Schlüter7, Konstantinos T Konstantinidis4, Irini Angelidaki3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microorganisms in biogas reactors are essential for degradation of organic matter and methane production. However, a comprehensive genome-centric comparison, including relevant metadata for each sample, is still needed to identify the globally distributed biogas community members and serve as a reliable repository.Entities:
Keywords: Anaerobic digestion; Biogas; Functional reconstruction; Metagenome-assembled genomes; Microbial community structure
Year: 2020 PMID: 32123542 PMCID: PMC7038595 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-020-01679-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1The tree is a representation of the β-diversity values determined from samples comparison. Reactor temperature and feeding substrates are reported in the external circles. Histogram graph in the external ring represents Fisher alpha diversity values
Fig. 2Representation of the MAGs fraction “shared” among samples. Arcs colored from black to dark red connect samples having increasing fractions of shared MAGs. Samples in the external circle are colored according to the temperature of the reactor
Number of MAGs assigned to different categories according to their quality
| MAGs number before clustering (ANI) | MAGs number after clustering (ANI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
HQ MAGs Cp > 90%, Ct < 5% | 1628 | HQ MAGs selected from clusters | 441 |
| HQ MAGs identified once | 355 | ||
MHQ MAGs 90% > Cp ≥70%, 10% > Ct > 5% | 1316 | MHQ MAGs selected from clusters | 170 |
| MHQ MAGs identified once | 435 | ||
MQ MAGs 50% ≥ Cp > 70%, 10% > Ct > 5% | 526 | MQ MAGs selected from clusters | 15 |
| MQ MAGs identified once | 219 | ||
LQ MAGs Cp < 50% | 1436 | ||
Contaminated MAGs Ct > 10% | 288 | ||
| Total | 5194 | Total | 1635 |
ANI genome-wide average nucleotide identity
MAGs belonging to one cluster generated during ANI calculation are indicated as “Selected from clusters”, while MAGs not clustered at more than 95% ANI are indicated as “identified once”
Fig. 3Box plots of genome size and completeness. a Genome size and b completeness of the 1635 selected MAGs. c Scatter plot reporting the completeness and contamination levels for each MAG (circle size is proportional to the genome length)
Fig. 4MAGs taxonomic assignment. The maximum likelihood tree was inferred from the concatenation of 400 taxonomic informative proteins and spans a de-replicated set of 61 archaeal and 1574 bacterial MAGs. External circles represent, respectively: (1) taxonomic assignment at phylum level, (2) genome size (bar plot), (3) heatmap representing the number of experiments where each MAG had abundance higher than 0.001% (from blue 0% to red 10%), (4) average abundance (from blue 0% to red 10%) and (5) maximum abundance determined among the entire set of experiments (from blue 0% to red 10%)
Fig. 5Hierarchical clustering of the “complete” and “1 bm” KEGG modules identified in the HQ and MHQ MAGs. In the right part of the figure taxonomic assignment is shown for the most represented phyla. KEGG modules specifically identified in selected phyla are highlighted
Fig. 6Representation of the relative abundance of relevant functional modules in the AD system: a “methanogenesis from CO2”, “acetate” and “methylamines” and “W-L pathway”, b oxidation pathway, c selected polysaccharide degradation modules. Bar graph was obtained for each sample by summing the relative abundance of all the HQ and MHQ MAGs encoding these “complete” and “1 bm” modules. Samples collected from biogas plants are in the left part of the figure (first 26 samples), while those derived from laboratory reactors or batch tests are shown in the right part
Fig. 7Box plots reporting the index of replication for some selected taxonomic groups. Index of replication. a Distribution of iRep values obtained for 538 MAGs belonging to each of the 25 phyla having at least three MAGs (“na” refers to taxonomically unassigned MAGs). b Distribution of iRep values obtained for Euryarchaeota. MAGs having only one value are reported as a horizontal bar