Literature DB >> 25819618

Ammonia and temperature determine potential clustering in the anaerobic digestion microbiome.

Jo De Vrieze1, Aaron Marc Saunders2, Ying He3, Jing Fang3, Per Halkjaer Nielsen2, Willy Verstraete1, Nico Boon4.   

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion is regarded as a key environmental technology in the present and future bio-based economy. The microbial community completing the anaerobic digestion process is considered complex, and several attempts already have been carried out to determine the key microbial populations. However, the key differences in the anaerobic digestion microbiomes, and the environmental/process parameters that drive these differences, remain poorly understood. In this research, we hypothesized that differences in operational parameters lead to a particular composition and organization of microbial communities in full-scale installations. A total of 38 samples were collected from 29 different full-scale anaerobic digestion installations, showing constant biogas production in function of time. Microbial community analysis was carried out by means of amplicon sequencing and real-time PCR. The bacterial community in all samples was dominated by representatives of the Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria, covering 86.1 ± 10.7% of the total bacterial community. Acetoclastic methanogenesis was dominated by Methanosaetaceae, yet, only the hydrogenotrophic Methanobacteriales correlated with biogas production, confirming their importance in high-rate anaerobic digestion systems. In-depth analysis of operational and environmental parameters and bacterial community structure indicated the presence of three potential clusters in anaerobic digestion. These clusters were determined by total ammonia concentration, free ammonia concentration and temperature, and characterized by an increased relative abundance of Bacteroidales, Clostridiales and Lactobacillales, respectively. None of the methanogenic populations, however, could be significantly attributed to any of the three clusters. Nonetheless, further experimental research will be required to validate the existence of these different clusters, and to which extent the presence of these clusters relates to stable or sub-optimal anaerobic digestion.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Methane; Microbial community organization; Microbiome; Sequencing; Sludge

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25819618     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  38 in total

1.  Microbiome taxonomic and functional profiles of two domestic sewage treatment systems.

Authors:  K J Hidalgo; T Saito; R S Silva; Tiago P Delforno; Iolanda C S Duarte; V M de Oliveira; Dagoberto Y Okada
Journal:  Biodegradation       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 2.  Microbial invasions in sludge anaerobic digesters.

Authors:  Nuria Fernandez-Gonzalez; G H R Braz; L Regueiro; J M Lema; M Carballa
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Feedstock thermal pretreatment selectively steers process stability during the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge.

Authors:  Cindy Ka Y Law; Rens De Henau; Jo De Vrieze
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Archaeal community dynamics in biogas fermentation at various temperatures assessed by mcrA amplicon sequencing using different primer pairs.

Authors:  Monika Vítězová; Jan Lochman; Martina Zapletalová; Stefan Ratering; Sylvia Schnell; Tomáš Vítěz
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Profiling temporal dynamics of acetogenic communities in anaerobic digesters using next-generation sequencing and T-RFLP.

Authors:  Abhijeet Singh; Bettina Müller; Anna Schnürer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  The core populations and co-occurrence patterns of prokaryotic communities in household biogas digesters.

Authors:  Junpeng Rui; Jiabao Li; Shiheng Zhang; Xuefeng Yan; Yuanpeng Wang; Xiangzhen Li
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Microorganism-regulated mechanisms of temperature effects on the performance of anaerobic digestion.

Authors:  Qiang Lin; Guihua He; Junpeng Rui; Xiaoyu Fang; Yong Tao; Jiabao Li; Xiangzhen Li
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 5.328

8.  Comparative analysis of taxonomic, functional, and metabolic patterns of microbiomes from 14 full-scale biogas reactors by metagenomic sequencing and radioisotopic analysis.

Authors:  Gang Luo; Ioannis A Fotidis; Irini Angelidaki
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Substrate Type and Free Ammonia Determine Bacterial Community Structure in Full-Scale Mesophilic Anaerobic Digesters Treating Cattle or Swine Manure.

Authors:  Jiabao Li; Junpeng Rui; Minjie Yao; Shiheng Zhang; Xuefeng Yan; Yuanpeng Wang; Zhiying Yan; Xiangzhen Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  The microbial community structure in industrial biogas plants influences the degradation rate of straw and cellulose in batch tests.

Authors:  Li Sun; Tong Liu; Bettina Müller; Anna Schnürer
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.