Literature DB >> 35449716

Gendered Logics of Biomedical Research: Women in U.S. Phase I Clinical Trials.

Marci D Cottingham1, Jill A Fisher2.   

Abstract

Despite the importance of including diverse populations in biomedical research, women remain underrepresented as healthy volunteers in the testing of investigational drugs in Phase I trials. Contributing significantly to this are restrictions that pharmaceutical companies place on the participation of women of so-called childbearing potential. These restrictions have far-reaching effects on biomedical science and the public health of women. Using 191 interviews collected over 3 years, this article explores the experiences of 47 women who navigate restrictions on their participation in U.S. Phase I trials. Women in this context face a number of contradictory criteria when trying to enroll, which can curtail their participation, justify additional surveillance, and deny pregnant women reproductive agency. The pharmaceutical industry's putative protections for hypothetical fetuses exacerbate inequalities and attenuate a thorough investigation of the safety of their drugs for public consumption. We use the framework of "anticipatory motherhood" within a gendered organizations approach to make sense of women's experiences in this context.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anticipatory motherhood; biomedical research; clinical trials; gendered organizations; women’s health

Year:  2020        PMID: 35449716      PMCID: PMC9017784          DOI: 10.1093/socpro/spaa035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Probl        ISSN: 0037-7791


  23 in total

1.  The Yentl syndrome.

Authors:  B Healy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Is there still too much extrapolation from data on middle-aged white men?

Authors:  P Cotton
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Reproductive toxicity testing of pharmaceutical compounds to support the inclusion of women in clinical trials.

Authors:  C Parkinson; K E Thomas; C E Lumley
Journal:  Hum Exp Toxicol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Using "clinical trial diaries" to track patterns of participation for serial healthy volunteers in U.S. phase I studies.

Authors:  Heather B Edelblute; Jill A Fisher
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Performing informed consent in transgender medicine.

Authors:  Stef M Shuster
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Representation of Women and Minorities in Clinical Trials for New Molecular Entities and Original Therapeutic Biologics Approved by FDA CDER from 2013 to 2015.

Authors:  Alice Chen; Hilary Wright; Hawi Itana; Merina Elahi; Ayomide Igun; Guoxing Soon; Anne R Pariser; Emmanuel O Fadiran
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Gendered Organizations in the New Economy.

Authors:  Christine L Williams; Chandra Muller; Kristine Kilanski
Journal:  Gend Soc       Date:  2012-08

8.  Risk and Emotion Among Healthy Volunteers in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Marci D Cottingham; Jill A Fisher
Journal:  Soc Psychol Q       Date:  2016-07-29

9.  Motherhood preconceived: the emergence of the Preconception Health and Health Care Initiative.

Authors:  Miranda R Waggoner
Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.265

10.  This isn't going to end well: Fictional representations of medical research in television and film.

Authors:  Jill A Fisher; Marci D Cottingham
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2016-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.