| Literature DB >> 32121155 |
Sabra Zouhair1, Eleonora Dal Sasso1, Sugat R Tuladhar1, Catia Fidalgo1, Luca Vedovelli2, Andrea Filippi3,4,5, Giulia Borile3,5,6, Andrea Bagno7,8, Massimo Marchesan1, De Rossi Giorgio9, Dario Gregori2, Willem F Wolkers10, Filippo Romanato3,5,8,11, Sotirios Korossis12,13,14, Gino Gerosa1,8, Laura Iop1,8.
Abstract
Xenogeneic pericardium-based substitutes are employed for several surgical indications after chemical shielding, limiting their biocompatibility and therapeutic durEntities:
Keywords: bovine pericardium; decellularization; porcine pericardium; surgery; surgical replacements; tissue engineering
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32121155 PMCID: PMC7175169 DOI: 10.3390/biom10030371
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Decellularization yield of bovine and porcine pericardia after TRICOL procedure. (A) DNA content before and after decellularization. The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). DNA was significantly reduced in decellularized scaffolds when compared to native ones. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. (B) Histological evaluation before and after decellularization. Intact extracellular matrix (ECM) and no nuclear material were revealed in decellularized bovine (e) and porcine (m) pericardia with respect to their native counterparts (a and i) (Haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)). Collagen organization was intact after decellularization (f for bovine and n for porcine), as in the native corresponding samples (b and j) (Masson trichrome (MT)). A light discoloration was observed for Alcian blue (AB) in decellularized bovine (g) and porcine (o) pericardia with respect to their native counterparts (c and k). No changes in the elastic fibers were detected between the bovine and porcine ECM of native (d and l, respectively) and decellularized (h and p, respectively) pericardia (Van Gieson (VG)). Magnification bars: 100 µm. s= serosa, f= fibrosa. NBP = Native Bovine Pericardium, DBP = Decellularized Bovine Pericardium, NPP = Native Porcine Pericardium, and DPP = Decellularized Porcine Pericardium.
Figure 2Extracellular matrix (ECM) properties of bovine and porcine pericardia before and after TRICOL decellularization. The general histoarchitecture of collagen and elastin was preserved after TRICOL decellularization (red; f and g for bovine ECM; p and q for porcine ECM) with respect to the native condition (red; a and b for bovine ECM; k and l for porcine ECM). The basal lamina elements, i.e., collagen IV, laminin and heparan sulfate, were not removed in TRICOL-treated tissues (red; h-j for bovine ECM and r-t for porcine ECM) as compared to native samples (red; c-e for bovine ECM and m-o for porcine ECM). Nuclei, clearly visible with DAPI in native tissues (blue; a–e for bovine tissues; k–o for porcine tissues), were absent after decellularization (f–j for bovine scaffolds; p–t for porcine scaffolds). Magnification bars: 100 µm. NBP = Native Bovine Pericardium, DBP = Decellularized Bovine Pericardium, NPP = Native Porcine Pericardium, and DPP = Decellularized Porcine Pericardium.
Figure 3Ultrastructural properties of bovine and porcine pericardia before and after TRICOL decellularization. The mesothelial cell lining of the serosa side of bovine (a and b) and porcine (i and j) pericardia was removed after decellularization (e and f for bovine; m and n for porcine). The collagen bundles were loosened in the native bovine fibrosa (c and d), becoming more organized after decellularization (g and h), while they were crimped for the porcine counterparts (k and l for native; o and p for decellularized). Magnification bars: 10 µm. NBP = Native Bovine Pericardium, DBP = Decellularized Bovine Pericardium, NPP = Native Porcine Pericardium, and DPP = Decellularized Porcine Pericardium.
Figure 4Extracellular matrix (ECM) pattern of bovine and porcine pericardia before and after TRICOL decellularization. (A) Second harmonic generation and autofluorescence. In the decellularized serosa (e and f for bovine; m and n for porcine), collagen and elastin maintained the tight organization of the native condition (a and b for bovine; i and j for porcine). Bovine acellular fibrosa (g and h) showed an unaltered collagen loosen distribution with respect to native tissue (c and d). A more crimped and wavy appearance was shown in the decellularized porcine counterpart (k and l for native and o and p for decellularized). Magnification bars: 100 µm. (B) Collagen coherency (C). C of collagen bundles decreased significantly for decellularized serosa of both species and decellularized porcine fibrosa with respect to native tissues. (C) Elastin coherency (C). C of elastin fibers was significantly higher in native porcine serosa samples than in decellularized ones. (D) Straightness parameter (Ps) of collagen bundles. No significant modifications were revealed after decellularization for the Ps of collagen, apart from bovine fibrosa. For B, C and D, data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001. NBP= Native Bovine Pericardium, DBP= Decellularized Bovine Pericardium, NPP= Native Porcine Pericardium, DPP= Decellularized Porcine Pericardium, C= coherency, and Ps= straightness parameter.
Figure 5Quantitative biochemical profile of bovine and porcine pericardia before and after TRICOL decellularization. (A) Hydroxyproline (HYP) content. Estimated amount of HYP appeared superior in decellularized bovine tissues especially. (B) Denatured HYP. No denaturation was observed after decellularization in both species, as opposite to positive controls (autoclaved tissues). (C) Sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAGs) content. TRICOL decellularization decreased sGAGs, significantly in bovine pericardium. (D) Elastin content. No significant differences were revealed for elastin content. (E) Hydration level. Water content modified significantly after decellularization: it increased for bovine pericardium, while decreased for porcine one. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). *p <0.05; **p <0.01; ***p <0.001; ****p < 0.0001. NBP= Native Bovine Pericardium, DBP= Decellularized Bovine Pericardium, NPP= Native Porcine Pericardium, and DPP= Decellularized Porcine Pericardium.
Figure 6Denaturation profiles of bovine and porcine pericardia before and after TRICOL decellularization. (A) Second derivatives of the recorded spectra between 1600 and 1700 cm−1. No modifications were induced by TRICOL decellularization on the secondary structure, i.e., α-helical structures (1650 cm−1) and ß-sheets (1630 cm−1). (B) R ratio. R was not significantly modified by TRICOL decellularization in both species’ tissues. (C) Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) thermograms. Similar profiles were observed when decellularized and native pericardia of both species were compared. Glutaraldehyde treatment sensibly modified tissue thermograms. (D) The onset temperature (Tonset) of protein denaturation. Denaturation occurred at decreased temperature with respect to native tissues only for porcine pericardium. Glutaraldehyde treatment caused a significant increase of the denaturation temperature for both species with respect to all other groups considered. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). *p <0.05, ***p <0.001. NBP= Native Bovine Pericardium, DBP= Decellularized Bovine Pericardium, NPP= Native Porcine Pericardium, DPP= Decellularized Porcine Pericardium, and GA= Glutaraldehyde.
Figure 7Biomechanical properties of bovine and porcine pericardia before and after TRICOL decellularization. (A) Stress-strain curves. Typical J-shaped curves of soft tissues were appreciated for all tested pericardial samples. (B) Thickness. As compared to native tissues, TRICOL decellularization induced no significant changes in bovine pericardium thickness, while varied porcine one. Glutaraldehyde (GA) increased significantly the thickness of bovine pericardium, but decreased that of porcine scaffold. (C) Elastic-phase modulus. TRICOL decellularization had no effects on elastic-phase modulus. (D) Collagen phase modulus. After TRICOL decellularization, both bovine and porcine pericardial scaffolds showed a decrease in collagen phase modulus, although significant only for the second species. GA significantly increased collagen phase modulus of bovine pericardium. (E) Failure strain. No significant failure strain modifications were reported after TRICOL decellularization, while a significant rise was observed after GA treatment in porcine tissues. (F) Ultimate tensile strength (UTS). TRICOL decellularization tended to reduce ultimate tensile strength of both species’ tissues, without any statistical significance. The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). *p< 0.005, **p< 0.01, ***p< 0.001. NBP= Native Bovine Pericardium, DBP= Decellularized Bovine Pericardium, NPP= Native Porcine Pericardium, DPP= Decellularized Porcine Pericardium, and GA= Glutaraldehyde.
Figure 8Bioactivity of bovine and porcine pericardia after TRICOL decellularization. (A) Contact assay with human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBM-MSCs) and umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Both cell types displayed typical morphology, respectively spindle-shape and cobblestone-like, when cultured in contact with bovine and porcine decellularized scaffolds (a and b, as well as e and f), similarly to seeded alone (positive controls: c and g). In the cytotoxic glue environment (negative control), no cell growth was evident (d and h). Scale bar: 100 µm. (B) Proliferation assay for hBM-MSCs. When compared to positive controls (culture plastic support), no proliferation differences were observed at 24 h, while increases were revealed in respect to both decellularized scaffolds and between porcine and bovine ones. The data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). * p < 0.5, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. (C) Proliferation assay for HUVECs. Differences in proliferation were not evident at 24 h, but at 72 h among all groups considered. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Significance differences are shown inside the same group with respect to time. * p < 0.5, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. (D) Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity assay for hBM-MSCs. The direct contact with decellularized bovine and porcine pericardial scaffolds did not induce hBM-MSCs cytotoxicity either at 24 or 72 h. (E) LDH cytotoxicity assay for HUVECs. Cytotoxicity of HUVECs was observed high at 24 h and decreased near 0 at 72 h after seeding onto decellularized bovine and porcine pericardial scaffolds. Data are presented as mean ± SD. DBP= Decellularized Bovine Pericardium, DPP= Decellularized Porcine Pericardium, hBM-MSCs= human bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells, and HUVECs= human umbilical vein endothelial cells..
Differences Between Bovine and Porcine Pericardia Before and After TRICOL Decellularization.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Serosal collagen C | ↓↓↓↓ | ↓ | ↓ | ↓↓↓ | |
| Serosal elastin C | NS | NS | ↓↓↓ | ↓ | |
| Serosal Ps | NS | NS | NS | ↓↓ | |
| Fibrosal collagen C | ↓ | NS | ↓↓↓ | ↓↓ | |
| Fibrosal elastin C | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Fibrosal Ps | NS | ↑ | NS | ↓↓↓↓ | |
|
| |||||
| Collagen | NS | ↑↑ | NS | NS | |
| Denatured collagen | ↓↓↓ | NS | NS | ↓↓↓↓ | |
| sGAGs | NS | ↓↓ | NS | NS | |
| Elastin | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Water | ↓↓ | ↑↑↑↑ | ↓↓ | ↓↓↓↓ | |
| DNA | NS | ↑↑ | ↑↑↑ | NS | |
|
| |||||
| R | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Tonset | NS | NS | ↓ | ↓↓↓↓ | |
|
| |||||
| Thickness | ↓↓↓↓ | NS | ↑↑↑ | ↓ | |
| Elastin-phase modulus | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
| Collagen-phase modulus | ↑ | NS | ↓ | NS | |
| Failure strain | ↓↓↓ | NS | NS | ↓ | |
| UTS | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
|
| |||||
| hBM-MSCs MTS 24 h | / | / | / | NS | |
| hBM-MSCs MTS 72 h | / | / | / | NS | |
| HUVECs MTS 24 h | / | / | / | NS | |
| HUVECs MTS 72 h | / | / | / | NS | |
Legend: NBP: native bovine pericardium; NPP: native porcine pericardium; DBP: decellularized bovine pericardium; DPP: decellularized porcine pericardium; C: coherence; Ps: straightness parameter; sGAGs: sulfated glycosaminoglycans; R: ratio between alpha helix and beta-sheet structures; Tonset: denaturation temperature; UTS: ultimate tensile strength; h-BM-MSCs: human bone marrow-mesenchymal stem cells; HUVECs: human umbilical vein- endothelial cells; MTS: proliferation index; /: not tested; NS: non-significant; ↓ or ↑: p< 0.05; ↓↓ or ↑↑: p< 0.01; ↓↓↓ or ↑↑↑: p< 0.001; ↓↓↓↓ or ↑↑↑↑: p< 0.0001.
Possible Indications for Clinical Applications of TRICOL Decellularized Bovine and Porcine Pericardia.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Heart valve reconstruction, aortic repair, intracardiac defect corrections, | Matrix P (E), Photofix (B), | + | + | |
|
| ||||
| Anterior abdominal wall reconstruction, hernia repair | Tutopatch (B), Tutomesh (B), | +* | + | |
|
| ||||
| Bone reconstruction, | Tutopatch (B), Tutoplast (B), Tutodent; CopiOs Pericardium (B); Osteokor pericardium (B); Lyoplant (B); Jason (P) | +** | + | |
|
| ||||
| Facial aesthetics, Breast aesthetics | Veritas (B) | + | + | |
Legend: DBP: decellularized bovine pericardium; DPP: decellularized porcine pericardium. Photofix, Cryolife, Kennesaw, GA, US; Matrix P, Auto Tissue Berlin GmbH, Berlin, Germany; CardioCel, Admedus, Geneva, Switzerland; Tutodent, Tutoplast and Tutomesh Tutogen Medical GmbH, Neunkirchen, Germany; COVA, CopiOs Pericardium, Zimmer Biomet Dental, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, US; Lyoplant, Braun, Milan, Italy; Jason ®, Botiss biomaterials, Zossen, Germany; Veritas®, Baxter, Rome Italy; B: bovine; E: equine; P: porcine. + Possible application. * Further analyses are needed to evaluate the suitability of scaffold applications in gastrointestinal reconstructions requiring higher extensibility. ** Further analyses are needed to evaluate the suitability of scaffold applications for tendon surgery.