Literature DB >> 24859403

Acellular bovine pericardium dermal matrix in immediate breast reconstruction after Skin Sparing Mastectomy.

A Gubitosi1, G Docimo1, D Parmeggiani1, R Pirozzi1, C Vitiello1, P Schettino1, M Avellino1, G Casalino1, M Amato2, R Ruggiero3, L Docimo1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Mastectomy for breast cancer may bring the patient to develop long term issues concerning the psychological and physical status. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) should be considered and proposed by physicians as an integrated procedure in the surgical approach to breast cancer to reduce further surgery. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been used in revision breast reconstruction for fold malposition, capsular contracture and rippling also, showing good outcomes with low risk of complications. Aim of this study was to verify if the known advantages in using ADM for IBR would led to lower rates of seroma formation, infection, skin flap necrosis and overall complication related to the implant.
METHODS: We performed a prospective study, including all consecutive patients undergone to IBR with biological graft with ADM between January 2012 and January 2013 at our Institution. Data on major issues of the patients and complications were recorded. All patients underwent to IBR with ADM (Tutomesh) implant with or without fibrin sealant positioning.
RESULTS: A total of 24 patients underwent 28 immediate breast reconstruction with Tutomesh ADM implant. Main postoperative complications included seroma formation in 20.8% (5 pts), infection in 8.3% (2 pts) and hematoma in 4.2% (1 pt). There were any skin flap necrosis in the study. Diabetes was associated in two cases with edema and ecchymosis; hypertension with infection in one case (implant removal) and seroma in one case. First class of obesity (BMI 30-32.7) was associated with seroma in 3 cases, and with infection in one. In patient without fibrin sealant (12 patients - 13 breasts) complications were represented by hematoma (1 pt. 4.2%), infection (1 pt. 4.2%; implant removal) and seroma (4 pts 16.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of Tutomesh(®) bovine pericardium for immediate breast is safe and technically useful. Complications rate is not high, except for seroma formation that can be reduced by the contemporary use of fibrin sealant.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24859403     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  10 in total

1.  Conjunctival structural and functional reconstruction using acellular bovine pericardium graft (Normal GEN®) in rabbits.

Authors:  Danping Huang; Bing Xu; Xiaonan Yang; Binbin Xu; Jing Zhao
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Current opinions on indications and algorithms for acellular dermal matrix use in primary prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael M Vu; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

3.  A Head to Head Comparison Between SurgiMend® - Fetal Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix and Tutomesh® - A Bovine Pericardium Collagen Membrane in Breast Reconstruction in 45 Cases.

Authors:  Christian Eichler; Jeria Efremova; Klaus Brunnert; Christian M Kurbacher; Oleg Gluz; Julian Puppe; Mathias Warm
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Conservative mastectomies and immediate reconstruction with the use of ADMs.

Authors:  Alexander Govshievich; Ron B Somogyi; Mitchell H Brown
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

5.  What happens to an acellular dermal matrix after implantation in the human body? A histological and electron microscopic study.

Authors:  Martin Boháč; Ľuboš Danišovič; Ján Koller; Jana Dragúňová; Ivan Varga
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.188

Review 6.  Novel devices for implant-based breast reconstruction: is the use of meshes to support the lower pole justified in terms of benefits? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  Lorna Jane Cook; Tibor Kovacs
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2018-01-10

7.  Examination of the Effects of Celecoxib on Postmastectomy Seroma and Wound Healing.

Authors:  Evren Besler; Ömer Harmancıoğlu
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2018-09-28

8.  Response to: Comment on "Evaluation of Complication Rates after Breast Surgery Using Acellular Dermal Matrix: Median Follow-Up of Three Years".

Authors:  Felix J Paprottka; Nicco Krezdorn; Heiko Sorg; Sören Könneker; Stiliano Bontikous; Ian Robertson; Christopher L Schlett; Nils-Kristian Dohse; Detlev Hebebrand
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2018-08-01

9.  A Comprehensive Comparison of Bovine and Porcine Decellularized Pericardia: New Insights for Surgical Applications.

Authors:  Sabra Zouhair; Eleonora Dal Sasso; Sugat R Tuladhar; Catia Fidalgo; Luca Vedovelli; Andrea Filippi; Giulia Borile; Andrea Bagno; Massimo Marchesan; De Rossi Giorgio; Dario Gregori; Willem F Wolkers; Filippo Romanato; Sotirios Korossis; Gino Gerosa; Laura Iop
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-02-28

10.  Acellular bovine pericardium matrix in immediate breast reconstruction compared with conventional implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S Wang; S He; X Zhang; J Sun; Q Huang; J Liu; C Han; Z Yin; B Ding; J Yin
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2021-03-27
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.