Literature DB >> 32112061

Implicit adaptation compensates for erratic explicit strategy in human motor learning.

Yohsuke R Miyamoto1, Shengxin Wang2, Maurice A Smith3,4.   

Abstract

Sports are replete with strategies, yet coaching lore often emphasizes 'quieting the mind', 'trusting the body' and 'avoiding overthinking' in referring to the importance of relying less on high-level explicit strategies in favor of low-level implicit motor learning. We investigated the interactions between explicit strategy and implicit motor adaptation by designing a sensorimotor learning paradigm that drives adaptive changes in some dimensions but not others. We find that strategy and implicit adaptation synergize in driven dimensions, but effectively cancel each other in undriven dimensions. Independent analyses-based on time lags, the correlational structure in the data and computational modeling-demonstrate that this cancellation occurs because implicit adaptation effectively compensates for noise in explicit strategy rather than the converse, acting to clean up the motor noise resulting from low-fidelity explicit strategy during motor learning. These results provide new insight into why implicit learning increasingly takes over from explicit strategy as skill learning proceeds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32112061     DOI: 10.1038/s41593-020-0600-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  39 in total

1.  Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; Z M Pine; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  PLASTICITY IN HUMAN SENSORIMOTOR CONTROL.

Authors:  R HELD; S J FREEDMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The generalization of visuomotor learning to untrained movements and movement sequences based on movement vector and goal location remapping.

Authors:  Howard G Wu; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A spatial explicit strategy reduces error but interferes with sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Bryan L Benson; Joaquin A Anguera; Rachael D Seidler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Flexible explicit but rigid implicit learning in a visuomotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Krista M Bond; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  An FMRI study of the role of the medial temporal lobe in implicit and explicit sequence learning.

Authors:  Haline E Schendan; Meghan M Searl; Rebecca J Melrose; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; John W Krakauer; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  An explicit strategy prevails when the cerebellum fails to compute movement errors.

Authors:  Jordan A Taylor; Nola M Klemfuss; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.847

10.  Motor memory is encoded as a gain-field combination of intrinsic and extrinsic action representations.

Authors:  Jordan B Brayanov; Daniel Z Press; Maurice A Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  15 in total

1.  Competition between parallel sensorimotor learning systems.

Authors:  Scott T Albert; Jihoon Jang; Shanaathanan Modchalingam; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Henriques; Gonzalo Lerner; Valeria Della-Maggiore; Adrian M Haith; John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 8.713

2.  Human Variation in Error-Based and Reinforcement Motor Learning Is Associated With Entorhinal Volume.

Authors:  Anouk J de Brouwer; Corson N Areshenkoff; Mohammad R Rashid; J Randall Flanagan; Jordan Poppenk; Jason P Gallivan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.861

Review 3.  The neural mechanisms of manual dexterity.

Authors:  Anton R Sobinov; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 38.755

4.  De novo learning versus adaptation of continuous control in a manual tracking task.

Authors:  Christopher S Yang; Noah J Cowan; Adrian M Haith
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Loss of peripheral vestibular input alters the statistics of head movement experienced during natural self-motion.

Authors:  Omid A Zobeiri; Benjamin Ostrander; Jessica Roat; Yuri Agrawal; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Revisiting the Role of the Medial Temporal Lobe in Motor Learning.

Authors:  Samuel D McDougle; Sarah A Wilterson; Nicholas B Turk-Browne; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  An implicit memory of errors limits human sensorimotor adaptation.

Authors:  Scott T Albert; Jihoon Jang; Hannah R Sheahan; Lonneke Teunissen; Koenraad Vandevoorde; David J Herzfeld; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-02-04

8.  Implicit motor learning within three trials.

Authors:  Jennifer E Ruttle; Bernard Marius 't Hart; Denise Y P Henriques
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The Psychology of Reaching: Action Selection, Movement Implementation, and Sensorimotor Learning.

Authors:  Hyosub E Kim; Guy Avraham; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Adaptive control of movement deceleration during saccades.

Authors:  Simon P Orozco; Scott T Albert; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.