| Literature DB >> 32111947 |
Slaven Jurić1, Katarina Sopko Stracenski1, Żaneta Król-Kilińska2, Ivanka Žutić3, Sanja Fabek Uher3, Edyta Đermić4, Snježana Topolovec-Pintarić4, Marko Vinceković5.
Abstract
Encapsulated bioactive agents applied to the Lactuca sativa L. present an innovative approach to stimulate the production of plant secondary metabolites increasing its nutritive value. Calcium and copper ions were encapsulated in biopolymeric microparticles (microspheres and microcapsules) either as single agents or in combination with biocontrol agents, Trichoderma viride spores, a fungal plant growth mediator. Both, calcium and copper ions are directly involved in the synthesis of plant secondary metabolites and alongside, Trichoderma viride can provide indirect stimulation and higher uptake of nutrients. All treatments with microparticles had a positive effect on the enhancement of plant secondary metabolites content in Lactuca sativa L. The highest increase of chlorophylls, antioxidant activity and phenolic was obtained by calcium-based microparticles in both, conventionally and hydroponically grown lettuces. Non-encapsulated fungus Trichoderma viride enhanced the synthesis of plant secondary metabolites only in hydroponics cultivation signifying the importance of its encapsulation. Encapsulation proved to be simple, sustainable and environmentally favorable for the production of lettuce with increased nutritional quality, which is lettuce fortified with important bioactive compounds.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32111947 PMCID: PMC7048752 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60690-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic presentation of a microsphere and a microcapsule.
Treatment labels for conventional and hydroponic cultivation, used chemical agents (gelling cations), presence of biological agent (T. viride) in microparticles.
| Treatment labels (Conventional/Hydroponics) | Chitosan coating | Gelling cation/ chemical agent | Chemical agent share in 4 g of microparticles | Biocontrol agent ( | Number of |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| − | Ca2+ | 9.87 ± 0.41 mg | − | − | |
| − | Cu2+ | 8.44 ± 0.24 mg | − | − | |
| − | Ca2+ | 10.08 ± 0.65 mg | + | 8.8 × 104 | |
| − | Cu2+ | 8.73 ± 0.36 mg | + | 2.6 × 104 | |
| + | Ca2+ | 9.98 ± 0.46 mg | − | − | |
| + | Cu2+ | 8.53 ± 0.55 mg | − | − | |
| + | Ca2+ | 10.11 ± 0.64 mg | + | 1.1 × 105 | |
| + | Cu2+ | 8.87 ± 0.18 mg | + | 3.2 × 104 | |
| − | − | − | + | *1.4 × 106 mL−1 | |
| − | − | − | − | − | |
*Number of T. viride spores suspended in a saline solution (0.85%).
Ca – conventional/calcium-alginate microspheres; H-Ca – hydroponics/calcium-alginate microspheres; Cu – conventional/copper-alginate microspheres; H-Cu – hydroponics/copper-alginate microspheres; Ca/Tv – conventional/calcium-alginate microspheres with T. viride spores; H-Ca/Tv – hydroponics/calcium-alginate microspheres with T. viride spores; Cu/Tv – conventional/copper-alginate microspheres with T. viride spores; H-Cu/Tv – hydroponics/copper-alginate microspheres with T. viride spores; Ca-c – conventional/calcium-alginate microcapsules-chitosan coated; H-Ca-c – hydroponics/calcium-alginate microcapsules-chitosan coated; Cu-c – conventional/copper-alginate microcapsules-chitosan coated; H-Cu-c – hydroponics/copper-alginate microcapsules-chitosan coated; Ca/Tv-c – conventional/ calcium-alginate microcapsules with T. viride spores-chitosan coated; H-Ca/Tv-c – conventional/calcium-alginate microcapsules with T. viride spores-chitosan coated; Cu/Tv-c – conventional/copper-alginate microcapsules with T. viride spores-chitosan coated; H-Cu/Tv-c – conventional/copper-alginate microcapsules with T. viride spores-chitosan coated; Tv – conventional/T. viride spore suspension in saline solution; H-Tv – hydroponics/T. viride spore suspension in saline solution; C – conventional/control; H-C – hydroponics/control. **Abbreviations in general: Ca or Cu is regarded to gelling cation which was used in the formation of alginate microbeads; Tv denotes the presence of T. viride spores in microparticles; large H- denotes hydroponics type of cultivation (HC) opposite of no denotation which is conventional cultivation (CC); small -c is regarded as alginate microbeads coated with chitosan.
Figure 2Schematic overview of the application and maturation of lettuces in two different types of cultivation (conventional vs. hydroponics).
Figure 3Principal component analysis Scree plot of the components (a) and plot of Factor 1 and Factor 2, with variables correlations (red lines). Abbreviations of investigated types of microparticles are presented in Table 1 and Principal component analysis summary statistics are in supplementary Table S1.
Figure 4Agglomerative hierarchical clustering (AHC) dendrogram of dissimilarities and main cluster formations (a) and dendrogram formation of clusters after the microparticles treatments and analysis (b). Abbreviations of investigated types of microparticles are presented in Table 1.
Antioxidant activity of treated lettuce both in conventional (CC) and hydroponic (HC) cultivation with relative change respectively to the control.
| Treatment | ABTS (µmol TE/g d.w.) | *Relative change (%) | DPPH (µmol TE/g d.w.) | *Relative change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.5 ± 1.0a-g | +29.7 | 17.1 ± 1.0a-d | +32.4 | |
| 18.3 ± 1.3h | +10.3 | 16.5 ± 0.4e-g | +27.9 | |
| 17.6 ± 0.4a | +6.3 | 15.7 ± 0.7h,i | +21.8 | |
| 17.7 ± 1.7b | +6.7 | 14.0 ± 0.7a,e | +8.4 | |
| 17.0 ± 0.7c | +2.6 | 15.3 ± 0.6j | +18.2 | |
| 16.9 ± 1.6d | +1.8 | 14.8 ± 0.7 | +14.2 | |
| 18.8 ± 1.8i | +13.7 | 15.4 ± 1.8k,l | +19.0 | |
| 15.7 ± 1.5e | −5.0 | 14.3 ± 0.8b | +10.4 | |
| 14.6 ± 0.1f,h,i | −12.0 | 12.6 ± 0.7c,f,h,j,k | −2.4 | |
| 16.6 ± 0.8g | 12.9 ± 0.6d,g,i,l | |||
| 18.5 ± 1.7a | +37.7 | 17.0 ± 2.4a | +48.5 | |
| 17.3 ± 1.1 | +28.3 | 13.8 ± 0.2b | +20.8 | |
| 18.0 ± 0.7 | +33.6 | 15.1 ± 0.8 | +31.8 | |
| 18.1 ± 0.1 | +34.3 | 16.1 ± 2.0 | +40.6 | |
| 19.8 ± 1.9b | +47.3 | 17.8 ± 0.4c,d | +56.1 | |
| 16.7 ± 0.1c | +24.3 | 12.6 ± 0.4c,e,f | +10.7 | |
| 22.1 ± 2.3c,d,e | +63.9 | 19.3 ± 1.8b,e,g,h | +69.0 | |
| 15.8 ± 2.7d | +17.7 | 13.1 ± 0.3g | +14.8 | |
| 19.0 ± 1.7f | +41.3 | 17.9 ± 1.8f,i | +56.6 | |
| 13.4 ± 2.3a,b,e,f | 11.4 ± 1.2a,d,h,i | |||
*Relative change (%) with respect to the control treatment. Values superscripted with the same letter within a column are significantly different according to the posthoc Tukey HSD test (p < 0.05).
**Abbreviations: Ca or Cu is regarded to gelling cation which was used in the formation of alginate microbeads; Tv denotes the presence of T. viride spores in microparticles; large H- denotes hydroponics type of cultivation (HC) opposite of no denotation which is conventional cultivation (CC); small -c is regarded as alginate microbeads coated with chitosan.
Chlorophyll analysis of treated lettuce both in conventional (CC) and hydroponic (HC) cultivation with relative change respectively to the control.
| Treatment | Chlorophyll | *Relative change (%) | Chlorophyll | *Relative change (%) | Total Chlorophylls (µg/g d.w.) | *Relative change (%) | Chlorophyll |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1418.0 ± 119.7a-c | +45.0 | 530.7 ± 40.5a,b | +46.0 | 1948.7 ± 159.7a-c | +45.3 | 2.7 | |
| 1201.9 ± 27.5 | +22.9 | 492.9 ± 67.8c | +35.6 | 1694.8 ± 57.4d | +26.3 | 2.4 | |
| 1247.2 ± 140.8 | +27.5 | 478.6 ± 48.4 | +31.7 | 1725.9 ± 134.1e | +28.7 | 2.6 | |
| 1273.0 ± 105.3d | +30.2 | 479.7 ± 32.7 | +32.0 | 1752.7 ± 135.2f,g | +30.7 | 2.7 | |
| 1396.8 ± 138.5e-g | +42.8 | 527.1 ± 39.4d | +45.0 | 1923.9 ± 177.6h-j | +43.4 | 2.7 | |
| 1098.0 ± 38.2a,e | +12.3 | 388.1 ± 49.1a,d,e | +6.7 | 1486.0 ± 72.5a,h,k | +10.8 | 2.8 | |
| 1292.3 ± 108.5h,i | +32.2 | 470,2 ± 28.9 | +29.3 | 1762.5 ± 137.4l,m | +31.4 | 2.7 | |
| 1325.2 ± 69.3j,k | +35.5 | 528.5 ± 68.2e,f | +45.4 | 1853.7 ± 70.4k,n,o | +38.2 | 2.5 | |
| 1010.9 ± 80.9b,f,h,j | +3.4 | 405.7 ± 32.6 | +11.6 | 1416.6 ± 64.7b,f,i,l,n | +5.6 | 2.5 | |
| 977.9 ± 62.5c,d,g,i,k | 363.6 ± 21.5b-d,f | 1341.5 ± 83.6c-e,g,j,m,o | 2.7 | ||||
| 957.9 ± 53.0a-i | +76.2 | 391.8 ± 28.0a-h | +74.8 | 1349.7 ± 79.4a-i | +75.8 | 2.4 | |
| 713.1 ± 79.2a,j,k | +31.2 | 296.5 ± 41.5a,i,j | +32.3 | 1009.6 ± 118.0a,j,k | +31.5 | 2.4 | |
| 691.6 ± 30.3b,l | +27.2 | 307.8 ± 8.6b,k,l | +37.4 | 999.4 ± 26.4b,l,m | +30.2 | 2.2 | |
| 696.4 ± 74.2c,m | +28.1 | 284.2 ± 29.8c | +26.8 | 980.6 ± 99.6c,n | +27.7 | 2.5 | |
| 784.8 ± 75.1d,n,o,p | +44.4 | 337.1 ± 9.6m-o,p | +50.4 | 1121.9 ± 83.8d,o-s | +46.1 | 2.3 | |
| 663.2 ± 98.9e | +22.0 | 274.9 ± 41.6d | +22.7 | 938.1 ± 140.3e | +22.2 | 2.4 | |
| 593.5 ± 56.9f,n | +9.2 | 251.5 ± 23.6e,m | +12.2 | 845.0 ± 80.3f,o | +10.1 | 2.4 | |
| 622.4 ± 49.6g | +14.5 | 252.8 ± 15.8f,n | +12.8 | 875.3 ± 65.2g,p | +14.0 | 2.5 | |
| 501.5 ± 31.2h,j,l,m,o | −7.7 | 221.4 ± 22.9g,i,k,o | −1.2 | 723.0 ± 49.5h,j,l,n,r | −5.8 | 2.3 | |
| 543.6 ± 59.3i,k,p | 224.1 ± 20.8h,j,l,p | 767.7 ± 79.8i,k,m,s | 2.4 | ||||
*Relative change (%) with respect to the control treatment. Values superscripted with the same letter within a column are significantly different according to the posthoc Tukey HSD test (p < 0.05).
**Abbreviations: Ca or Cu is regarded to gelling cation which was used in the formation of alginate microbeads; Tv denotes the presence of T. viride spores in microparticles; large H- denotes hydroponics type of cultivation (HC) opposite of no denotation which is conventional cultivation (CC); small -c is regarded as alginate microbeads coated with chitosan.
Share of bioactive compounds of treated lettuce both in conventional (CC) and hydroponic (HC) cultivation with relative change respectively to the control.
| Treatment | Total flavonoids (mg QE/g d.w.) | *Relative change (%) | Total polyphenols (mg GAE/g d.w.) | *Relative change (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.6 ± 0.2a-d | +15.2 | 4.4 ± 0.4a,b | +15.5 | |
| 9.2 ± 0.3e,f | +10.8 | 4.2 ± 0.3c | +10.2 | |
| 8.8 ± 0.5g | +6.5 | 4.2 ± 0.5d | +9.3 | |
| 8.2 ± 0.3a,h | −0.8 | 3.7 ± 0.1a | −4.4 | |
| 9.2 ± 0.4i,j | +11.3 | 4.4 ± 0.0e | +14.1 | |
| 8.1 ± 0.2b,e,i,k,l | −3.1 | 3.8 ± 0.1 | −1.0 | |
| 9.3 ± 0.1h,k,m | +12.2 | 4.0 ± 0.3 | +4.0 | |
| 9.3 ± 0.8l,n | +11.5 | 4.1 ± 0.3 | +6.5 | |
| 7.3 ± 0.3c,f,g,j,m,n | −11.6 | 3.4 ± 0.2b-e | −11.1 | |
| 8.3 ± 0.2d | 3.8 ± 0.1 | |||
| 9.7 ± 0.2ab | +39.0 | 4.2 ± 0.4 | +26.6 | |
| 8.6 ± 0.3c | +23.1 | 4.0 ± 0.8 | +19.9 | |
| 8.4 ± 0.1d | +19.4 | 3.9 ± 0.2 | +18.1 | |
| 8.3 ± 0.7e | +19.1 | 3.7 ± 0.6 | +11.2 | |
| 8.9 ± 0.9f | +26.5 | 4.1 ± 0.2 | +22.2 | |
| 8.0 ± 0.1ag | +13.9 | 3.5 ± 0.1a | +5.2 | |
| 10.0 ± 0.7d,e,g,h | +42.2 | 4.9 ± 0.6a-c | +47.6 | |
| 8.9 ± 0.1i | +26.4 | 3.4 ± 0.6b | +1.8 | |
| 9.0 ± 0.8j | +28.6 | 4.3 ± 0.2 | +28.1 | |
| 7.0 ± 0.9b,c,f,h-j | 3.3 ± 0.1c | |||
*Relative change (%) with respect to the control treatment. Values superscripted with the same letter within a column are significantly different according to the posthoc Tukey HSD test (p < 0.05).
**Abbreviations: Ca or Cu is regarded to gelling cation which was used in the formation of alginate microbeads; Tv denotes the presence of T. viride spores in microparticles; large H- denotes hydroponics type of cultivation (HC) opposite of no denotation which is conventional cultivation (CC); small -c is regarded as alginate microbeads coated with chitosan.