| Literature DB >> 32108990 |
Jun Wan1,2, Joke Konings1,2, Qiuting Yan1,2, Hilde Kelchtermans1,2, Romy Kremers1,2, Bas de Laat1,2, Mark Roest1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fluorogenic thrombin generation (TG) assays are commonly used to determine global coagulation phenotype in plasma. Whole blood (WB)-TG assays reach one step closer to physiology by involving the intrinsic blood cells, but erythrocytes cause variable quenching of the fluorescence signals, hampering its routine application.Entities:
Keywords: blood cells; blood coagulation disorders; erythrocytes; platelet activation; thrombin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32108990 PMCID: PMC7317846 DOI: 10.1111/jth.14786
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Thromb Haemost ISSN: 1538-7836 Impact factor: 5.824
Figure 1The performance of this novel WB‐TG assay and the CRG‐based calculation method. (A) The reaction between calibrator α2M‐T (100 nmol/L thrombin activity) and substrate P2Rho (300 μmol/L) in citrated whole blood. Mean (solid line) and mean ± standard deviation (dashed lines) of 12 replicate experiments are shown. The dotted line represents the first derivative of the average fluorescence tracing. (B) The fluorescence tracing of two parallel WB‐TG experiments at 2.5 pmol/L TF in the absence (black line) or presence (red line) of exogenously added 2.5 μmol/L Rhodamine (Rho) fluorophore. The red dashed line is the residual signal after subtracting the background Rho signal from the total signal. (C) An extended Chapman‐Richards growth (CRG) equation was fitted on the experimental fluorescence data from t = 0 until t = time‐to‐peak; the correctness of the fitting, as shown by the small difference between the fitted data (F fit, red solid line) and the experimental data (F exp, black dashed line) is shown in the insert. (D) The calculated thrombograms from the fitted data (TGfit, red solid line) and the experimental data (TGexp, black dashed line) overlap well with each other
Intra‐ and interassay variations of this novel WB‐TG assay
| Intra‐assay variation (n = 15) | Interassay variation (n = 18) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | CV, % | Mean ± SD | CV, % | |
| Lag time (min) | 5.7 ± 0.1 | 1.8 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 6.2 |
| Time‐to‐peak (min) | 8.4 ± 0.2 | 2.0 | 6.7 ± 0.3 | 4.1 |
| Peak (nmol/L) | 173 ± 10 | 5.6 | 239 ± 14 | 6.0 |
| ETPp (nmol min/L) | 260 ± 9 | 3.6 | 308 ± 20 | 6.5 |
Abbreviations: ETPp, endogenous thrombin potential until thrombin peak; WB‐TG, whole blood thrombin generation.
Figure 2Comparisons between the novel WB‐TG assay and the paper‐based assay. For both assays, TG was triggered at (A) 0 or (B) 1 pmol/L TF in citrated whole blood from 10 healthy volunteers. Same reagents were used in both assays. Thrombogram parameters were calculated using the CRG assay for the novel assay without filter paper (no paper) or with the CAT assay for the filter paper‐based assay (with paper). Mean and standard deviation are indicated as bars in the figures. Comparisons between groups were done using the paired t test, **P < .01; ***P < .001; ****P < .0001
Figure 3TG in reconstituted blood samples as measured by the novel WB‐TG assay. Human whole blood was separated into erythrocytes, platelets, and PPP and then reconstituted into the indicated levels. TG was measured in reconstituted PRP with varying platelet (PLT) count in the (A) absence or (B) presence of 4 μmol/L phospholipids (PL). (C, D) TG was measured in reconstituted samples with varying platelet counts (0, 200, or 450 × 109/L) and hematocrit (HCT; 0%, 22%, or 45%) as indicated in the figures. The (C) lag time and (D) peak thrombin of TG are shown. Each condition was measured in triplicate
Thrombin generation measured in reconstituted blood using the novel WB‐TG assay
| Platelet (×109/L) | 0 | 200 | 450 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hematocrit (%) | 0 | 22 | 45 | 0 | 22 | 45 | 0 | 22 | 45 |
| Lag time (min) | 16.5 ± 0.1 | 13.3 ± 0.2 | 15.2 ± 0.3 | 7.0 ± 0.1 | 6.4 ± 0.1 | 7.2 ± 0.1 | 6.2 ± 0.1 | 6.3 ± 0.2 | 6.8 |
| Time‐to‐peak (min) | NA | NA | 18.5 ± 0.2 | 12.2 ± 0.2 | 10.9 ± 0.3 | 10.0 ± 0.1 | 10.0 ± 0.2 | 10.2 ± 0.2 | 9.4 ± 0.1 |
| Peak (nmol/L) | 22.3 ± 0.1 | 59.7 ± 2.7 | 207.5 ± 4.6 | 134.7 ± 2.6 | 185.6 ± 13.6 | 261.3 ± 16.4 | 181.8 ± 3.9 | 211.5 ± 14.2 | 254.3 ± 9.1 |
| ETPp (nmol min/L) | NA | NA | 363.9 ± 18.2 | 390.8 ± 5.2 | 450.4 ± 12.0 | 381.3 ± 39 | 380.9 ± 13 | 446.0 ± 34.1 | 346.1 ± 16.1 |
Abbreviations: ETPp, endogenous thrombin potential until thrombin peak; NA, not available; WB‐TG, whole blood thrombin generation.
TG in 2 groups (platelet count = 0 and hematocrit = 0 or 22%) did not reach peak thrombin level even after 50 minutes; consequently, the ETPp could not be calculated and the thrombin concentration at t = 50 minutes was registered as peak thrombin value. Each condition was measured in triplicate. Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Interindividual variations and reference intervals of the WB‐TG parameters
| n | % CV | Median | Reference Intervals (2.5th to 97.5th Percentiles) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female, number (%) | 60 (50.4%) | – | – | – |
| Age | 119 | – | 31.0 | 20.0‐63.0 |
| Blood counts | ||||
| White blood cell (×109/L) | 119 | 23.5% | 5.8 | 4.1‐8.8 |
| Erythrocyte (×1012/L) | 119 | 8.9% | 4.9 | 4.1‐6.0 |
| Hemoglobin (mmol/L) | 119 | 8.7% | 8.8 | 7.0‐10.4 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 119 | 8.1% | 42.9 | 35.4‐48.3 |
| Platelet (×109/L) | 119 | 20.9% | 263.3 | 151.1‐397.8 |
| Mean platelet volume (fL) | 119 | 11.1% | 7.5 | 6.0‐9.8 |
| WB‐TG 1 pmol/L TF | ||||
| Lag time (min) | 119 | 16.6% | 4.2 | 3.2‐6.1 |
| Time‐to‐peak (min) | 119 | 14.8% | 7.0 | 5.9‐10.6 |
| Peak (nmol/L) | 119 | 18.0% | 203.2 | 122.5‐297.7 |
| ETPp (nmol min/L) | 119 | 21.1% | 315.6 | 218.9‐522.9 |
| WB‐TG 2.5 pmol/L TF | ||||
| Lag time (min) | 119 | 15.5% | 2.8 | 2.1‐4.1 |
| Time‐to‐peak (min) | 119 | 12.3% | 5.3 | 4.5‐7.1 |
| Peak (nmol/L) | 119 | 15.2% | 230.7 | 161.3‐316.9 |
| ETPp (nmol min/L) | 119 | 19.8% | 307.6 | 222.6‐489.7 |
Abbreviations: ETPp, endogenous thrombin potential until the thrombin peak;TF, tissue factor; WB‐TG, whole blood thrombin generation.
Figure 4The WB‐TG parameters of males and females in 119 healthy volunteers. TG was triggered at 1 pmol/L TF in citrated WB samples. WB‐TG parameters (A) lag time, (B) thrombin‐peak, (C) and ETPp are shown for the different groups, including males (n = 59) and females (n = 60). Medians and interquartile ranges are indicated as bars; the gray areas represent the reference intervals of the total population (2.5th percentile to 97.5th percentile). Statistical significance was determined using the Mann‐Whitney U‐test, **P < .01