Literature DB >> 32103845

Effect of a novel teat preparation system on upper extremity muscle activity among U.S. large-herd dairy parlor workers.

David I Douphrate1, Nathan B Fethke2, Matthew W Nonnenmann2, Anabel Rodriguez1, Robert Hagevoort3, David Gimeno Ruiz de Porras1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dairy production in the U.S. is moving towards large-herd milking operations resulting in an increase in task specialization and work demands. Large-herd dairy parlor workers experience a high prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in the upper extremity. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of an alternative teat scrubber (TS) cow preparation method on upper extremity muscle activity among large-herd parlor workers, as well compare to muscle activity associated with conventional manual milking tasks.
METHODS: Upper extremity muscle activity was recorded among U.S. large-herd parlor workers (n = 15) using surface electromyography. Participants performed multiple task cycles, using both conventional and TS methods. Muscle activity levels were then compared across conventional manual and TS milking tasks.
RESULTS: Conventional manual milking tasks of dip, strip and wipe were associated higher muscle activity levels of the upper trapezius and anterior deltoid. Biceps muscle activity was greatest during teat dip and wipe. Forearm flexor and extensor muscle activity was greatest during teat wipe and dip. The TS system resulted in more desirable anterior deltoid EMG profiles, and less desirable biceps, forearm flexor and extensor profiles.
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the TS system is effective in reducing anterior deltoid muscle activation levels. The TS system also appears to result in increased biceps, forearm flexor and extensor muscle activation levels. Increases in muscle activation levels could be offset by reduced repetitiveness resulting from three conventional manual milking tasks being replaced with one TS task. RELEVANCE TO INDUSTRY: If parlor production requirements (e.g., quality and onsistency) are maintained while simultaneously reducing cumulative muscle loading and worker fatigue, then TS use should be considered in milking parlor operations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agriculture workers; Dairy; Ergonomics; Farm; Injury; Musculoskeletal

Year:  2016        PMID: 32103845      PMCID: PMC7043381          DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2016.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon        ISSN: 0169-8141            Impact factor:   2.884


  29 in total

1.  Physical workload on upper extremities in various operations during machine milking.

Authors:  S Pinzke; M Stal; G A Hansson
Journal:  Ann Agric Environ Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.447

2.  The effects of working height and manipulated weights on subjective strain, body posture and muscular activity of milking parlor operatives--laboratory study.

Authors:  Martina Jakob; Falk Liebers; Sylvia Behrendt
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.661

3.  Normalization of surface EMG amplitude from the upper trapezius muscle in ergonomic studies - A review.

Authors:  S E Mathiassen; J Winkel; G M Hägg
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Task based exposure assessment in ergonomic epidemiology: a study of upper arm elevation in the jobs of machinists, car mechanics, and house painters.

Authors:  S W Svendsen; S E Mathiassen; J P Bonde
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Elimination of electrocardiogram contamination from electromyogram signals: An evaluation of currently used removal techniques.

Authors:  Janessa D M Drake; Jack P Callaghan
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 2.368

6.  Standard maximum isometric voluntary contraction tests for normalizing shoulder muscle EMG.

Authors:  Craig E Boettcher; Karen A Ginn; Ian Cathers
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  High-pass filtering to remove electrocardiographic interference from torso EMG recordings.

Authors:  M Redfern; R Hughes; D Chaffin
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Effect of concrete block weight and wall height on electromyographic activity and heart rate of masons.

Authors:  D Anton; J C Rosecrance; F Gerr; L A Merlino; T M Cook
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Risk factors and prevalence of declined work ability among dairy farmers.

Authors:  J P Karttunen; H Rautiainen
Journal:  J Agric Saf Health       Date:  2011-07

10.  Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal symptoms among US large-herd dairy parlor workers.

Authors:  David I Douphrate; David Gimeno; Matthew W Nonnenmann; Robert Hagevoort; Cecilia Rosas-Goulart; John C Rosecrance
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 2.214

View more
  1 in total

1.  Biomechanical factors during common agricultural activities: Results of on-farm exposure assessments using direct measurement methods.

Authors:  Nathan B Fethke; Mark C Schall; Howard Chen; Cassidy A Branch; Linda A Merlino
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.155

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.