Literature DB >> 16139521

Elimination of electrocardiogram contamination from electromyogram signals: An evaluation of currently used removal techniques.

Janessa D M Drake1, Jack P Callaghan.   

Abstract

Trunk electromyographic signals (EMG) are often contaminated with heart muscle electrical activity (ECG) due to the proximity of the collection sites to the heart and the volume conduction characteristics of the ECG through the torso. Few studies have quantified ECG removal techniques relative to an uncontaminated EMG signal (gold standard or criterion measure), or made direct comparisons between different methods for a given set of data. Understanding the impacts of both untreated contaminated EMG and ECG elimination techniques on the amplitude and frequency parameters is vital given the widespread use of EMG. The purpose of this study was to evaluate four groups of current and commonly used techniques for the removal of ECG contamination from EMG signals. ECG recordings at two intensity levels (rest and 50% maximum predicted heart rate) were superimposed on 11 uncontaminated biceps brachii EMG signals (rest, 7 isometric and 3 isoinertial levels). The 23 removal methods used were high pass digital filtering (finite impulse response (FIR) using a Hamming window, and fourth-order Butterworth (BW) filter) at five cutoff frequencies (20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 Hz), template techniques (template subtraction and an amplitude gating template), combinations of the subtraction template and high pass digital filtering, and a frequency subtraction/signal reconstruction method. For muscle activation levels between 10% and 25% of maximum voluntary contraction, the template subtraction and BW filter with a 30 Hz cutoff were the two best methods for maximal ECG removal with minimal EMG distortion. The BW filter with a 30 Hz cutoff provided the optimal balance between ease of implementation, time investment, and performance across all contractions and heart rate levels for the EMG levels evaluated in this study.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16139521     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  35 in total

1.  Effects of experimentally induced low back pain on the sit-to-stand movement and electroencephalographic contingent negative variation.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Chie Yaguchi; Chizuru Kaida; Mariko Irei; Masami Naka; Sharon M Henry; Katsuo Fujiwara
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Activation amplitude patterns do not change for back muscles but are altered for abdominal muscles between dominant and non-dominant hands during one-handed lifts.

Authors:  Heather L Butler; Cheryl L Hubley-Kozey; John W Kozey
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of lower extremity and trunk muscles recruitment on serratus anterior muscle activation in healthy male adults.

Authors:  Navpreet Kaur; Kunal Bhanot; Lori Thein Brody; Jennifer Bridges; David C Berry; Joshua J Ode
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-12

4.  Comparison of feature evaluation criteria for speech recognition based on electromyography.

Authors:  Niyawadee Srisuwan; Pornchai Phukpattaranont; Chusak Limsakul
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  The latissimus dorsi tendon functions as an external rotator after arthroscopic-assisted transfer for massive irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears.

Authors:  Olimpio Galasso; Matteo Mantovani; Marco Muraccini; Antonella Berardi; Massimo De Benedetto; Nicola Orlando; Giorgio Gasparini; Roberto Castricini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Neuromechanical response of the upper body to unexpected perturbations during gait initiation in young and older adults.

Authors:  Lorenzo Rum; Giuseppe Vannozzi; Andrea Macaluso; Luca Laudani
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Task-related and person-related variables influence the effect of low back pain on anticipatory postural adjustments.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Courtney A Lyman; Juvena R Hitt; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.161

8.  Neural mechanisms and functional correlates of altered postural responses to perturbed standing balance with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Carrie L Roy; Juvena R Hitt; Roman E Popov; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  A history of low back pain associates with altered electromyographic activation patterns in response to perturbations of standing balance.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Sharon M Henry; Stephanie L Jones; Juvena R Hitt; Janice Y Bunn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Effects of low back pain and of stabilization or movement-system-impairment treatments on induced postural responses: A planned secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jesse V Jacobs; Karen V Lomond; Juvena R Hitt; Michael J DeSarno; Janice Y Bunn; Sharon M Henry
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2015-08-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.