Literature DB >> 32101712

Transcription Factor Binding in Embryonic Stem Cells Is Constrained by DNA Sequence Repeat Symmetry.

Matan Goldshtein1, Meir Mellul2, Gai Deutch3, Masahiko Imashimizu4, Koh Takeuchi4, Eran Meshorer5, Oren Ram6, David B Lukatsky7.   

Abstract

Transcription factor (TF) recognition is dictated by the underlying DNA motif sequence specific for each TF. Here, we reveal that DNA sequence repeat symmetry plays a central role in defining TF-DNA-binding preferences. In particular, we find that different TFs bind similar symmetry patterns in the context of different developmental layers. Most TFs possess dominant preferences for similar DNA repeat symmetry types. However, in some cases, preferences of specific TFs are changed during differentiation, suggesting the importance of information encoded outside of known motif regions. Histone modifications also exhibit strong preferences for similar DNA repeat symmetry patterns unique to each type of modification. Next, using an in vivo reporter assay, we show that gene expression in embryonic stem cells can be positively modulated by the presence of genomic and computationally designed DNA oligonucleotides containing identified nonconsensus-repetitive sequence elements. This supports the hypothesis that certain nonconsensus-repetitive patterns possess a functional ability to regulate gene expression. We also performed a solution NMR experiment to probe the stability of double-stranded DNA via imino proton resonances for several double-stranded DNA sequences characterized by different repetitive patterns. We suggest that such local stability might play a key role in determining TF-DNA binding preferences. Overall, our findings show that despite the enormous sequence complexity of the TF-DNA binding landscape in differentiating embryonic stem cells, this landscape can be quantitatively characterized in simple terms using the notion of DNA sequence repeat symmetry.
Copyright © 2020 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32101712      PMCID: PMC7175408          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2020.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  23 in total

1.  DNA sequence correlations shape nonspecific transcription factor-DNA binding affinity.

Authors:  Itamar Sela; David B Lukatsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Increased subtlety of transcription factor binding increases complexity of genome regulation.

Authors:  Peter H von Hippel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Protein-DNA binding in the absence of specific base-pair recognition.

Authors:  Ariel Afek; Joshua L Schipper; John Horton; Raluca Gordân; David B Lukatsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Genome-wide nucleosome positioning during embryonic stem cell development.

Authors:  Vladimir B Teif; Yevhen Vainshtein; Maïwen Caudron-Herger; Jan-Philipp Mallm; Caroline Marth; Thomas Höfer; Karsten Rippe
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 5.  Absence of a simple code: how transcription factors read the genome.

Authors:  Matthew Slattery; Tianyin Zhou; Lin Yang; Ana Carolina Dantas Machado; Raluca Gordân; Remo Rohs
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 13.807

6.  Positive and negative impacts of nonspecific sites during target location by a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein: origin of the optimal search at physiological ionic strength.

Authors:  Alexandre Esadze; Catherine A Kemme; Anatoly B Kolomeisky; Junji Iwahara
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Transcription factor binding dynamics during human ES cell differentiation.

Authors:  Alexander M Tsankov; Hongcang Gu; Veronika Akopian; Michael J Ziller; Julie Donaghey; Ido Amit; Andreas Gnirke; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Acetylation- and Methylation-Related Epigenetic Proteins in the Context of Their Targets.

Authors:  Nasir Javaid; Sangdun Choi
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.096

9.  Single-cell ChIP-seq reveals cell subpopulations defined by chromatin state.

Authors:  Assaf Rotem; Oren Ram; Noam Shoresh; Ralph A Sperling; Alon Goren; David A Weitz; Bradley E Bernstein
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Comprehensive, high-resolution binding energy landscapes reveal context dependencies of transcription factor binding.

Authors:  Daniel D Le; Tyler C Shimko; Arjun K Aditham; Allison M Keys; Scott A Longwell; Yaron Orenstein; Polly M Fordyce
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Soft Power of Nonconsensus Protein-DNA Binding.

Authors:  Vladimir B Teif
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Understanding the Robustness of Protein Diffusion on DNA and Microtubules.

Authors:  David B Lukatsky
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Epitome: predicting epigenetic events in novel cell types with multi-cell deep ensemble learning.

Authors:  Alyssa Kramer Morrow; John Weston Hughes; Jahnavi Singh; Anthony Douglas Joseph; Nir Yosef
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Repetitive DNA symmetry elements negatively regulate gene expression in embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Meir Mellul; Shlomtzion Lahav; Masahiko Imashimizu; Yuji Tokunaga; David B Lukatsky; Oren Ram
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 3.699

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.