| Literature DB >> 32098146 |
Xiaoyu Zhang1, George A Cavender1, Kristina R Lewandowski1, Ginnefer O Cox2, Chad M Paton1,2.
Abstract
Provitamin A and pre-formed vitamin A compounds are essential micronutrients for humans. However, vitamin A deficiency (VAD) affects the health status of nearly 50% of populations in Southeast Asia and sub-Saharan Africa and is especially pronounced in preschool children and pregnant women. The objective of this research was to determine an acceptable flavor/ingredient combination to produce a palatable food product that incorporates sweet potatoes, peanut paste, and chickpeas. We sought to determine the acceptability of the three product formulations and to determine the influence of demographic data on ratings for the sensory attributes of each sample. To address VAD issues, three formulations of a product incorporating sweet potato puree (to increase β-carotene content), pure peanut butter (to provide fat for β-carotene absorption), and chickpeas (to provide a complete protein source), were developed: (1) an unflavored control, and two formulations with added natural seasonings: (2) curry-flavored, and (3) pumpkin spice-flavored. Sensory analysis of the three products showed that the curry-flavored product received the highest acceptability in terms of overall liking, flavor, texture, and appearance (p < 0.001). Since the demographic effect was not statistically significant (p > 0.05), it is highly likely that the curry-flavored product can be implemented in other countries or areas with high acceptability.Entities:
Keywords: 9-point hedonic test; product acceptability; vitamin A deficiency; β-carotene
Year: 2020 PMID: 32098146 PMCID: PMC7074339 DOI: 10.3390/foods9020232
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Product formulations for each of the three products used in the studies.
| Formulation | Flavor | Formulation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Unflavored Sample | Sweet potato puree | 60 g |
| Pure peanut butter | 35 g | ||
| Peeled chickpeas | 5 g | ||
| 2 | Curry-Flavored Sample | Salt | 1.6 g |
| Curry powder | 0.6 g | ||
| Ground cumin | 0.6 g | ||
| Ground turmeric | 0.48 g | ||
| Garlic powder | 0.28 g | ||
| Unflavored formulation | 100 g | ||
| 3 | Pumpkin Spice-Flavored Sample | Ground cinnamon | 0.61 g |
| Ground cloves | 0.38 g | ||
| Ground nutmeg | 0.16 g | ||
| Unflavored formulation | 100 g | ||
Figure 1Representative images of the three samples used in the sensory and physical property studies. Samples were prepared as indicated and served to participants as illustrated in the figure in a randomized order. Sensory data from an unflavored sample was compared to a curry-flavored and a pumpkin-spice flavored sample. Physical properties were also determined and presented in the analyses.
Physical properties of the three formulations of products used in the studies.
| Formulation | aw | pH | Color | Texture (Hardness) N/ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | ||||
| Unflavored | 0.98 ± 0.01 a | 4.9 ± 0.06 a | 54.4 ± 0.9 a | 8.8 ± 0.4 a | 38.7 ± 0.9 a | 9.7 ± 4 a |
| Curry-Flavored | 0.96 ± 0.01 a | 4.5 ± 0.1 b | 50.5 ± 0.2 b | 6.5 ± 0.2 b | 38.5 ± 0.4 a | 16.4 ± 5 ab |
| Pumpkin Spice-Flavored | 0.98 ± 0.01 a | 4.6 ± 0.04 b | 39.0 ± 0.4 s | 13.2 ± 0.03 c | 14.2 ± 0.7 b | 25.1 ± 6 b |
Mean values, ± standard error (SE, n = 3); different letters within the same column indicate significant different at p ≤ 0.05 (2-sided).
Mean scores for attributes of the three formulations of products used in the studies using a 9-point hedonic scale.
| Formulation | Overall Liking | Flavor | Texture | Appearance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unflavored | 5.6 ± 0.2 a | 5.6 ± 0.2 a | 5.6 ± 0.2 a | 5.3 ± 0.2 a |
| Curry-Flavored | 6.7 ± 0.2 b | 6.8 ± 0.2 b | 6.2 ± 0.2 b | 5.4 ± 0.2 a |
| Pumpkin Spice-Flavored | 3.8 ± 0.1 c | 3.8 ± 0.2 c | 5.0 ± 0.2 c | 4.3 ± 0.2 b |
Mean values, ± SE, (n = 105); different letters within the same column indicate significant different at p ≤ 0.05 (2-sided).
Demographic information of participants.
| Demographics | Category | Sample Size |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | Female | 70 (66.67%) |
| Male | 35 (33.33%) | |
| Age | 18–25 | 64 (60.95%) |
| 26–35 | 32 (30.48%) | |
| 36–45 | 5 (4.76%) | |
| 46–55 | 1 (0.95%) | |
| Above 56 | 3 (2.86%) | |
| Occupational Status | Student | 83 (79.05%) |
| Employed for wages | 22 (20.95%) | |
| Education Background | High school graduate | 10 (9.52%) |
| College, no diploma | 28 (26.67%) | |
| Bachelor’s degree | 28 (26.67%) | |
| Master’s degree | 28 (26.67%) | |
| Doctorate degree | 11 (10.48%) | |
| Nationality | US | 60 (57.14%) |
| American-born Chinese | 1 (0.95%) | |
| China | 25 (23.81%) | |
| South Korea | 6 (5.71%) | |
| India | 3 (2.86%) | |
| Japan | 2 (1.90%) | |
| Iran | 2 (1.90%) | |
| Nepal | 2 (1.90%) | |
| Turkey | 2 (1.90%) | |
| Brazil | 1 (0.95%) | |
| Haiti | 1 (0.95%) | |
| Vegan/Vegetarian | Not vegan/vegetarian | 97 (92.38%) |
| Vegan/vegetarian | 8 (7.62%) |
Mean scores for attributes of the three formulations of products used in the studies using a 9-point hedonic scale.
| Overall Liking | Flavor | Texture | Appearance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| US | 5.5 ± 0.2 a | 5.6 ± 0.2 a | 5.5 ± 0.2 a | 5.2 ± 0.2 a |
| Asian | 5.8 ± 0.3 a | 5.8 ± 0.3 a | 5.8 ± 0.3 a | 5.5 ± 0.3 a |
|
| ||||
| US | 6.7 ± 0.2 a | 6.9 ± 0.2 a | 6.1 ± 0.2 a | 5.5 ± 0.2 a |
| Asian | 6.7 ± 0.3 a | 6.8 ± 0.3 a | 6.4 ± 0.2 a | 5.2 ± 0.3 a |
|
| ||||
| US | 3.7 ± 0.2 a | 3.9 ± 0.2 a | 5.0 ± 0.2 a | 4.2 ± 0.2 a |
| Asian | 4.0 ± 0.3 a | 3.9 ± 0.3 a | 5.0 ± 0.3 a | 4.4 ± 0.3 a |
Mean values, ± SE; different letters within the same column indicate significant different at p ≤ 0.05 (2-sided). US: n = 61, Asian: n = 44.