Literature DB >> 32097459

Impact of gender and caregiving responsibilities on academic success in hematology.

Allison A King1,2,3, Sara K Vesely4, Emily Vettese5, Sadie Cook5, Adam Cuker6,7, Wendy Stock8, Morgan Homer9, Josel Fritz9, Lillian Sung5,10.   

Abstract

We previously identified gender disparities in academic success during evaluation of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) Clinical Research Training Institute (CRTI) and hypothesized that it may be related to caregiving. The objective was to evaluate the impact of gender and caregiving responsibilities on academic success. A cross-sectional survey that included a question about caregiving responsibilities was distributed to alumni who participated in CRTI from 2003 to 2016 and asked about academic productivity in the previous 3 years. Publications and grants were abstracted from submitted curriculum vitae. Academic success was defined as number of first- or senior-author publications, total publications, grants, and percent effort in research. Of 280 potential respondents, 258 responded (92% response rate), 169 (66%) had caregiving responsibilities, and 110 (43%) were men. Respondents with caregiving responsibilities had fewer first- or senior-author publications (median, 3 vs 5; P = .003) and less percent effort in research (median, 40% vs 50%; P = .006). Men had more first- or senior-author publications (median, 4 vs 3; P = .002) and more total publications (median, 12 vs 6.5; P = .0002) than women. When stratified by those without (P = .0001) or with (P = .042) caregiving responsibilities, men had more publications than women. Among men, caregiving responsibilities significantly reduced all outcomes. However, among women, caregiving did not have an impact. In conclusion, men had more publications than women whether or not they had caregiving responsibilities. However, among men, caregiving reduced academic productivity whereas among women, caregiving did not have impact. The scientific community will need to continue to identify the reasons for disparities and implement changes to address them.
© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32097459      PMCID: PMC7042991          DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Adv        ISSN: 2473-9529


  8 in total

1.  Subspeciality training in hematology and oncology, 2003: results of a survey of training program directors conducted by the American Society of Hematology.

Authors:  Robert F Todd; Scott D Gitlin; Linda J Burns
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Gender differences in academic productivity and leadership appointments of physicians throughout academic careers.

Authors:  Darcy A Reed; Felicity Enders; Rachel Lindor; Martha McClees; Keith D Lindor
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 3.  Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results.

Authors:  Sally Hopewell; Kirsty Loudon; Mike J Clarke; Andrew D Oxman; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21

4.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

5.  The American Society of Hematology Clinical Research Training Institute is associated with high retention in academic hematology.

Authors:  Allison A King; Sara K Vesely; Jessica Elwood; Joe Basso; Ken Carson; Lillian Sung
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Challenges in Measuring Benefit of Clinical Research Training Programs--the ASH Clinical Research Training Institute Example.

Authors:  Lillian Sung; Mark Crowther; John Byrd; Scott D Gitlin; Joe Basso; Linda Burns
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  The effect of an intense mentoring program on junior investigators' preparation for a patient-oriented clinical research career.

Authors:  Linda J Burns; Charles P Clayton; James N George; Beverly S Mitchell; Scott D Gitlin
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study.

Authors:  Marc J Lerchenmueller; Olav Sorenson; Anupam B Jena
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-12-16
  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Self-reported positive impact of mentored clinical research training is associated with academic success in hematology.

Authors:  Allison A King; Sara K Vesely; Grace Dadzie; Cecelia Calhoun; Adam Cuker; Wendy Stock; Alison Walker; Josel Fritz; Lillian Sung
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-07-27

2.  The Multifaceted Impact of COVID-19 on the Female Academic Emergency Physician: A National Conversation.

Authors:  Devjani Das; Michelle D Lall; Laura Walker; Valerie Dobiesz; Penelope Lema; Pooja Agrawal
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2020-10-21

3.  Operational Constraints and Gender Biases: A Qualitative Analysis of Physician Parenting Experiences.

Authors:  Hsin Lee; Heather L Burrows; Kanakadurga Singer; Kirk J Brower; Carol R Bradford; Brooke Spencley; Lauren Owens; Helen Kang Morgan
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2022-03-04

4.  Authorship diversity in hematology-related Cochrane systematic reviews: Inequities in global representation.

Authors:  Jyotirmoy Biswas; Arkadeep Dhali; Roger B Rathna; Christopher D'Souza
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2022-08-16

5.  Gender disparities in multiple myeloma publications.

Authors:  Aala Dweik; Hadeel Dweik; Hira Mian; Meera Mohan; Carolina Schinke; Samer Al Hadidi
Journal:  EJHaem       Date:  2022-06-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.