Literature DB >> 32097117

Effects on Medical Students of Longitudinal Small-Group Learning about Breaking Bad News.

Edlaine Faria de Moura Villela1, Luana Kronit Bastos1, Wanderson Sant'ana de Almeida1, Andressa Oliveira Pereira1, Matheus Silva de Paula Rocha1, Fábio Morato de Oliveira1, Valdes Roberto Bollela2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Delivering bad news is a difficult task for physicians, and medical schools do not always prepare future physicians for this inevitable task.
OBJECTIVE: To examine training in breaking bad news, to improve medical students' competence and confidence in dealing with this important aspect of clinical practice.
METHODS: An exploratory study using a qualitative approach was done at a Brazilian public university's medical school, which receives 30 medical students per semester. Two focus groups were conducted in 2018, with 15 students per group, before and after the training. The intervention consisted of a 6-month (4 h/wk) course about breaking bad news offered to 30 third-year medical students. The communication course included the perspectives of health care professionals, patients, and their families; the SPIKES protocol and the "ABCDE" mnemonic for delivering bad news; general guidelines; and role-playing/simulation strategies to improve students' skills and reduce their personal limitations.
RESULTS: Results of the preintervention focus group demonstrated that only 30% of the students were aware of the importance of breaking bad news and of the existence of specific protocols to guide physicians in these situations. Findings from the postintervention focus group indicated that 90% of students understood the importance and began to apply protocols in their practice. DISCUSSION: Breaking bad news is a challenge for undergraduate medical students. The results of our qualitative study showed that students' perceptions about their capability in delivering bad news increased significantly after regular and focused training. The knowledge, skills, and attitudes acquired strengthened the students' self-reported ability to deal with situations requiring breaking bad news.
CONCLUSION: The activities offered helped students develop communication skills. They made connections between their formal training (communication and cognitive skills) and actual clinical practice in a community-based rotation. The knowledge and skills acquired gave them tools needed to deliver bad news in their future clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32097117      PMCID: PMC7039420          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/19.157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  17 in total

1.  Teaching communication skills: an AACE survey of oncology training programs.

Authors:  Mark Hoffman; Jessica Ferri; Cristina Sison; Debra Roter; Lidia Schapira; Walter Baile
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  "Good" patients and "difficult" patients--rethinking our definitions.

Authors:  Louise Aronson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Effects of longitudinal small-group learning on delivery and receipt of communication skills feedback.

Authors:  Calvin L Chou; Dylan E Masters; Anna Chang; Marieke Kruidering; Karen E Hauer
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 6.251

4.  Feedback in clinical medical education.

Authors:  J Ende
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-08-12       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The introduction of medical humanities in the undergraduate curriculum of Greek medical schools: challenge and necessity.

Authors:  A Batistatou; E A Doulis; D Tiniakos; A Anogiannaki; K Charalabopoulos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 0.471

6.  Faculty staff perceptions of feedback to residents after direct observation of clinical skills.

Authors:  Jennifer R Kogan; Lisa N Conforti; Elizabeth C Bernabeo; Steven J Durning; Karen E Hauer; Eric S Holmboe
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.251

7.  Oncologists' attitudes toward and practices in giving bad news: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Walter F Baile; Renato Lenzi; Patricia A Parker; Robert Buckman; Lorenzo Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Communication skills assessment in the final postgraduate years to established practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amy E Gillis; Marie C Morris; Paul F Ridgway
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 9.  Breaking bad news.

Authors:  G K VandeKieft
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 10.  Measurement of physician-patient communication--a systematic review.

Authors:  Jördis M Zill; Eva Christalle; Evamaria Müller; Martin Härter; Jörg Dirmaier; Isabelle Scholl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Survey of Norwegian Nursing Students' Responses to Student-Centered Small Group Learning in the Study of Human Anatomy and Physiology.

Authors:  Guanglin Cui; Jann-Briger Laugsand; Wei Zheng
Journal:  SAGE Open Nurs       Date:  2021-10-04

2.  Delivering Bad News: Self-Assessment and Educational Preferences of Medical Students.

Authors:  Julia Lenkiewicz; Oliwia Lenkiewicz; Marcin Trzciński; Krzysztof Sobczak; Jan Plenikowski; Julia Przeniosło; Agata Kotłowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.