Seppo T Rinne1,2, David C Mohr3,4, Lakshman Swamy5, Amanda C Blok6,7, Edwin S Wong8,9, Martin P Charns3,4. 1. Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA, Bedford, MA, USA. seppo@bu.edu. 2. The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. seppo@bu.edu. 3. Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA, Boston, MA, USA. 4. Department of Health Law, Policy, & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. 5. The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA. 6. Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA, Bedford, MA, USA. 7. College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA. 8. Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered & Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA. 9. Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity of existing physician burnout studies impairs analyses of longitudinal trends, geographic distribution, and organizational factors impacting physician burnout. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is one of the largest integrated healthcare systems in the USA, offering a unique opportunity to study burnout across VA sites and time. OBJECTIVE: To characterize longitudinal burnout trends of VA physicians and assess organizational characteristics and geographic distribution associated with physician burnout. DESIGN: Longitudinal study of the VA All Employee Survey during 2013-2017. PARTICIPANTS: Self-identified physicians practicing in one of nine clinical service areas at 140 VA sites nationwide. MAIN MEASURES: We identified burnout using a validated definition adapted from the Maslach Burnout Inventory and characterized burnout trends for physicians in different clinical service areas. We used clustering analysis to categorize sites based on their burnout rates over time, and compared organizational characteristics and geographic distribution of high, medium, and low burnout categories. KEY RESULTS: We identified 40,382 physician responses from 140 VA sites. Mean burnout rates across all physicians ranged from 34.3% in 2013 to a high of 39.0% in 2014. Primary care physicians had the highest burnout. High burnout sites were more likely to be rural and non-teaching, have lower complexity (i.e., offer fewer advanced clinical services), and have fewer unique patients per site. CONCLUSIONS: VA physician burnout was lower than previously described in many non-VA studies and was relatively stable over time. These findings may be due to unique characteristics of the VA practice environment. Nonetheless, with over a third of VA physicians reporting burnout, organizational interventions are needed. Primary care physicians and those practicing at small, rural sites have higher rates of burnout and may warrant more focused attention. Our results can guide targeted interventions to promote VA physician well-being and inform efforts to address burnout in diverse clinical settings.
BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity of existing physician burnout studies impairs analyses of longitudinal trends, geographic distribution, and organizational factors impacting physician burnout. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is one of the largest integrated healthcare systems in the USA, offering a unique opportunity to study burnout across VA sites and time. OBJECTIVE: To characterize longitudinal burnout trends of VA physicians and assess organizational characteristics and geographic distribution associated with physician burnout. DESIGN: Longitudinal study of the VA All Employee Survey during 2013-2017. PARTICIPANTS: Self-identified physicians practicing in one of nine clinical service areas at 140 VA sites nationwide. MAIN MEASURES: We identified burnout using a validated definition adapted from the Maslach Burnout Inventory and characterized burnout trends for physicians in different clinical service areas. We used clustering analysis to categorize sites based on their burnout rates over time, and compared organizational characteristics and geographic distribution of high, medium, and low burnout categories. KEY RESULTS: We identified 40,382 physician responses from 140 VA sites. Mean burnout rates across all physicians ranged from 34.3% in 2013 to a high of 39.0% in 2014. Primary care physicians had the highest burnout. High burnout sites were more likely to be rural and non-teaching, have lower complexity (i.e., offer fewer advanced clinical services), and have fewer unique patients per site. CONCLUSIONS: VA physician burnout was lower than previously described in many non-VA studies and was relatively stable over time. These findings may be due to unique characteristics of the VA practice environment. Nonetheless, with over a third of VA physicians reporting burnout, organizational interventions are needed. Primary care physicians and those practicing at small, rural sites have higher rates of burnout and may warrant more focused attention. Our results can guide targeted interventions to promote VA physician well-being and inform efforts to address burnout in diverse clinical settings.
Authors: Charles M Balch; Michael R Oreskovich; Lotte N Dyrbye; Joseph M Colaiano; Daniel V Satele; Jeff A Sloan; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2011-09-03 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Lisa S Rotenstein; Matthew Torre; Marco A Ramos; Rachael C Rosales; Constance Guille; Srijan Sen; Douglas A Mata Journal: JAMA Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Colin P West; Liselotte N Dyrbye; Daniel V Satele; Jeff A Sloan; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Sonja Boone; Litjen Tan; Lotte N Dyrbye; Wayne Sotile; Daniel Satele; Colin P West; Jeff Sloan; Michael R Oreskovich Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-10-08
Authors: Tait D Shanafelt; Marilyn Raymond; Michael Kosty; Daniel Satele; Leora Horn; John Pippen; Quyen Chu; Helen Chew; William Benton Clark; Amy E Hanley; Jeff Sloan; William J Gradishar Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-03-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Laura Dwyer-Lindgren; Amelia Bertozzi-Villa; Rebecca W Stubbs; Chloe Morozoff; Johan P Mackenbach; Frank J van Lenthe; Ali H Mokdad; Christopher J L Murray Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Daniel S Tawfik; Ciaran S Phibbs; J Bryan Sexton; Peiyi Kan; Paul J Sharek; Courtney C Nisbet; Joseph Rigdon; Mickey Trockel; Jochen Profit Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-04-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Stephanie M Teixeira-Poit; Michael T Halpern; Heather L Kane; Michael Keating; Murrey Olmsted Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Eric A Apaydin; David C Mohr; Alison B Hamilton; Danielle E Rose; Sally Haskell; Elizabeth M Yano Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Zheng Z Milgrom; Tyler S Severance; Caitlin M Scanlon; Anyé T Carson; Andrea D Janota; Terry A Vik; Joan M Duwve; Brian E Dixon; Eneida A Mendonca Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2022-05-17 Impact factor: 3.298
Authors: Eric A Apaydin; Danielle E Rose; Elizabeth M Yano; Paul G Shekelle; Susan E Stockdale; David C Mohr Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Kara Zivin; Jennifer Kononowech; Matthew Boden; Kristen Abraham; Molly Harrod; Rebecca K Sripada; Helen C Kales; Hector A Garcia; Paul Pfeiffer Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2020-12-21
Authors: Eric A Apaydin; Danielle E Rose; Elizabeth M Yano; Paul G Shekelle; Michael G McGowan; Tami L Antonini; Cassandra A Valdez; Michelle Peacock; Laura Probst; Susan E Stockdale Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2021-08-01 Impact factor: 2.306
Authors: Kara Zivin; Ming-Un Myron Chang; Tony Van; Katerine Osatuke; Matt Boden; Rebecca K Sripada; Kristen M Abraham; Paul N Pfeiffer; Hyungjin Myra Kim Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Ryan Sterling; Seppo T Rinne; Ashok Reddy; Megan Moldestad; Peter Kaboli; Christian D Helfrich; Nora B Henrikson; Karin M Nelson; Catherine Kaminetzky; Edwin S Wong Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 6.473