Eric A Apaydin1,2, Danielle E Rose3, Elizabeth M Yano3,4,5, Paul G Shekelle3,5, Susan E Stockdale3,6, David C Mohr7,8. 1. Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA. eric.apaydin@va.gov. 2. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA. eric.apaydin@va.gov. 3. Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 4. Department of Health Policy and Management, Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 5. Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 6. Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 7. Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA. 8. Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Civility, or politeness, is an important part of the healthcare workplace, and its absence can lead to healthcare provider and staff burnout. Lack of civility is well-documented among mostly female nurses, but is not well-described among the gender-mixed primary care provider (PCP) workforce. Understanding civility and its relationship to burnout among male and female PCPs could help lead to tailored interventions to improve civility and reduce burnout in primary care. OBJECTIVE: To analyze gender differences in civility, burnout, and the relationship between civility and burnout among male and female PCPs. DESIGN: Multi-level logistic regression analysis of a cross-sectional national survey. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3216 PCP respondents (1946 women and 1270 men) in 135 medical centers from a 2019 national Veterans Health Administration (VA) survey. MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes: burnout; predictors: workplace civility and gender; controls: race, ethnicity, VA tenure, and supervisory status. KEY RESULTS: Workplace civility was rated higher (p<0.001) among male (mean = 4.07, standard deviation [SD] = 0.36, range 1-5) compared to female (mean = 3.88, SD = 0.33) PCPs. Almost half of the sample reported burnout (47.6%), but this difference was not significant (p = 0.73) between the genders. Higher workplace civility was significantly related to lower burnout among female PCPs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31 to 0.69), but not among male PCPs (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.42 to 1.22). Interactions between civility and other demographic variables (race, ethnicity, VA tenure, or supervisory status) were not significantly related to burnout. CONCLUSION: Female PCPs report lower workplace civility than male PCPs. An inverse relationship between civility and burnout is present for women but not men. More research is needed on this phenomenon. Interventions tailored to gender- and primary care-specific needs should be employed to increase civility and reduce burnout among PCPs.
BACKGROUND: Civility, or politeness, is an important part of the healthcare workplace, and its absence can lead to healthcare provider and staff burnout. Lack of civility is well-documented among mostly female nurses, but is not well-described among the gender-mixed primary care provider (PCP) workforce. Understanding civility and its relationship to burnout among male and female PCPs could help lead to tailored interventions to improve civility and reduce burnout in primary care. OBJECTIVE: To analyze gender differences in civility, burnout, and the relationship between civility and burnout among male and female PCPs. DESIGN: Multi-level logistic regression analysis of a cross-sectional national survey. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3216 PCP respondents (1946 women and 1270 men) in 135 medical centers from a 2019 national Veterans Health Administration (VA) survey. MAIN MEASURES: Outcomes: burnout; predictors: workplace civility and gender; controls: race, ethnicity, VA tenure, and supervisory status. KEY RESULTS: Workplace civility was rated higher (p<0.001) among male (mean = 4.07, standard deviation [SD] = 0.36, range 1-5) compared to female (mean = 3.88, SD = 0.33) PCPs. Almost half of the sample reported burnout (47.6%), but this difference was not significant (p = 0.73) between the genders. Higher workplace civility was significantly related to lower burnout among female PCPs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31 to 0.69), but not among male PCPs (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.42 to 1.22). Interactions between civility and other demographic variables (race, ethnicity, VA tenure, or supervisory status) were not significantly related to burnout. CONCLUSION: Female PCPs report lower workplace civility than male PCPs. An inverse relationship between civility and burnout is present for women but not men. More research is needed on this phenomenon. Interventions tailored to gender- and primary care-specific needs should be employed to increase civility and reduce burnout among PCPs.
Authors: Margaretha Wilhelmsson; Sari Ponzer; Lars-Ove Dahlgren; Toomas Timpka; Tomas Faresjö Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2011-04-21 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Stewart Babbott; Linda Baier Manwell; Roger Brown; Enid Montague; Eric Williams; Mark Schwartz; Erik Hess; Mark Linzer Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Colin P West; Liselotte N Dyrbye; Daniel V Satele; Jeff A Sloan; Tait D Shanafelt Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Seppo T Rinne; David C Mohr; Lakshman Swamy; Amanda C Blok; Edwin S Wong; Martin P Charns Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Neda Ratanawongsa; Debra Roter; Mary Catherine Beach; Shivonne L Laird; Susan M Larson; Kathryn A Carson; Lisa A Cooper Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2008-07-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Samuel T Edwards; Christian D Helfrich; David Grembowski; Elizabeth Hulen; Walter L Clinton; Gordon B Wood; Linda Kim; Danielle E Rose; Greg Stewart Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2018 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Batel Blechter; Nan Jiang; Charles Cleland; Carolyn Berry; Olugbenga Ogedegbe; Donna Shelley Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2018 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.657