Amanda McIntyre1, Stephanie L Marrocco1, Samantha A McRae2, Lindsay Sleeth1, Sander Hitzig3,4,5, Susan Jaglal6,7,8, Gary Linassi9, Sarah Munce7,8,10, Dalton L Wolfe1,11. 1. Lawson Health Research Institute, Parkwood Institute, Ontario, Canada. 2. Epidemiology, Western University, Ontario, Canada. 3. St. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 6. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 7. Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 8. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 9. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan, Canada. 10. Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto. 11. Health Sciences, Western University, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
Objective: To conduct a scoping review to identify what components of self-management are embedded in self-management interventions for spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: In accordance with the approach and stages outlined by Arksey and O'Malley (2005), a comprehensive literature search was conducted using five databases. Study characteristics were extracted from included articles, and intervention descriptions were coded using Practical Reviews in Self-Management Support (PRISMS) (Pearce et al, 2016), Barlow et al (2002), and Lorig and Holman's (2003) taxonomy. Results: A total of 112 studies were included representing 102 unique self-management programs. The majority of the programs took an individual approach (52.0%) as opposed to a group (27.4%) or mixed approach (17.6%). While most of the programs covered general information, some provided specific symptom management. Peers were the most common tutor delivering the program material. The most common Barlow components included symptom management (n = 44; 43.1%), information about condition/treatment (n = 34; 33.3%), and coping (n = 33; 32.4%). The most common PRISMS components were information about condition and management (n = 85; 83.3%), training/rehearsal for psychological strategies (n = 52; 51.0%), and lifestyle advice and support (n = 52; 51.0%). The most common Lorig components were taking action (n = 62; 60.8%), resource utilization (n = 57; 55.9%), and self-tailoring (n = 55; 53.9%). Conclusion: Applying self-management concepts to complex conditions such as SCI is only in the earliest stages of development. Despite having studied the topic from a broad perspective, this review reflects an ongoing program of research that links to an initiative to continue refining and testing self-management interventions in SCI.
Objective: To conduct a scoping review to identify what components of self-management are embedded in self-management interventions for spinal cord injury (SCI). Methods: In accordance with the approach and stages outlined by Arksey and O'Malley (2005), a comprehensive literature search was conducted using five databases. Study characteristics were extracted from included articles, and intervention descriptions were coded using Practical Reviews in Self-Management Support (PRISMS) (Pearce et al, 2016), Barlow et al (2002), and Lorig and Holman's (2003) taxonomy. Results: A total of 112 studies were included representing 102 unique self-management programs. The majority of the programs took an individual approach (52.0%) as opposed to a group (27.4%) or mixed approach (17.6%). While most of the programs covered general information, some provided specific symptom management. Peers were the most common tutor delivering the program material. The most common Barlow components included symptom management (n = 44; 43.1%), information about condition/treatment (n = 34; 33.3%), and coping (n = 33; 32.4%). The most common PRISMS components were information about condition and management (n = 85; 83.3%), training/rehearsal for psychological strategies (n = 52; 51.0%), and lifestyle advice and support (n = 52; 51.0%). The most common Lorig components were taking action (n = 62; 60.8%), resource utilization (n = 57; 55.9%), and self-tailoring (n = 55; 53.9%). Conclusion: Applying self-management concepts to complex conditions such as SCI is only in the earliest stages of development. Despite having studied the topic from a broad perspective, this review reflects an ongoing program of research that links to an initiative to continue refining and testing self-management interventions in SCI.
Authors: Jacinthe J E Adriaansen; Marcel W M Post; Sonja de Groot; Floris W A van Asbeck; Janneke M Stolwijk-Swüste; Marga Tepper; Eline Lindeman Journal: J Rehabil Med Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 2.912
Authors: Sarah Ep Munce; Michael G Fehlings; Sharon E Straus; Natalia Nugaeva; Eunice Jang; Fiona Webster; Susan B Jaglal Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2014-10-21 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: S E P Munce; S E Straus; M G Fehlings; J Voth; N Nugaeva; E Jang; F Webster; S B Jaglal Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Gaya Jeyathevan; Susan B Jaglal; Sander L Hitzig; Gary Linassi; Sandra Mills; Vanessa K Noonan; Karen Anzai; Teren Clarke; Dalton Wolfe; Mark Bayley; Lubna Aslam; Farnoosh Farahani; S Mohammad Alavinia; Maryam Omidvar; B Catharine Craven Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2021 Impact factor: 1.985