| Literature DB >> 32093370 |
Ahmed M Sayed1, Hani A Alhadrami2,3, Seham S El-Hawary4, Rabab Mohammed5, Hossam M Hassan5, Mostafa E Rateb5,6, Usama Ramadan Abdelmohsen7,8, Walid Bakeer9.
Abstract
In the present study, a small marine-derived natural products library was assessed for antibacterial potential. Among 36 isolated compounds, a number of bis-indole derivatives exhibited growth-inhibitory activity towards Gram-positive strains (Bacillus subtilis and multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus). 5- and 6-trisindoline (5-Tris and 6-Tris) were the most active derivatives (minimum inhibitory concentration, MIC, 4-8 µM) that were subsequently selected for anti-biofilm activity evaluation. Only 5-Tris was able to inhibit the staphylococcal biofilm formation starting at a 5 µM concentration. In order to investigate their possible molecular targets, both natural products were subjected to in silico inverse virtual screening. Among 20 target proteins, DNA gyrase and pyruvate kinase were the most likely to be involved in the observed antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of both selected natural products. The in vitro validation and in silico binding mode studies revealed that 5-Tris could act as a dual enzyme inhibitor (IC50 11.4 ± 0.03 and 6.6 ± 0.05 µM, respectively), while 6-Tris was a low micromolar gyrase-B inhibitor (IC50 2.1 ± 0.08 µM), indicating that the bromine position plays a crucial role in the determination of the antibacterial lead compound inhibitory activity.Entities:
Keywords: MRSA; antibacterial; antibiofilm; gyrase-B; inverse virtual screening; marine natural products; pyruvate kinase; trisindoline
Year: 2020 PMID: 32093370 PMCID: PMC7074965 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8020293
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Some examples of marine-derived indole compounds.
Figure 2Outline of the procedure used in this study. SAR: structure–activity relationship.
Figure 3Inhibition of biofilm formation and planktonic growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A by (A) 5-trisindoline (5-Tris) and (B) 6-trisindoline (6-Tris). OD: Optical Density.
Figure 4Structure–activity relationship of the bioactive indole compounds. PK: pyruvate kinase; Gyr-B: gyrase subunit B.
Binding energies (kcal/mol) of 5-Tris and 6-Tris against a number of possible staphylococcal targets.
| Molecular Target | Function | Mode of Action | Binding Energy (5-Tris) | Binding Energy (6-Tris) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FtsZ | GTPase | Cell division | −6.3 | −6.0 |
| PK | Pyruvate kinase | Glycolysis | −8.8 | −6.9 |
| SpsB | Signal Peptidase | Protein secretion | −3.9 | −5.0 |
| Isoleucyl-tRNA synthetase | Protein biosynthesis | Protein modification | −5.3 | −4.0 |
| Peptide deformylase | Protein modification | −5.8 | −4.9 | |
| Peptidyl transferase | Protein biosynthesis | Protein modification | 3.9 | 4.1 |
| rRNA methyltransferase | Protein biosynthesis | Protein modification | −4.2 | −5.5 |
| Threonyl−tRNA synthetase | Protein biosynthesis | Protein modification | −5.1 | −5.2 |
| Gyr A | DNA gyrase | DNA replication | −4.3 | −4.8 |
| Gyr B | DNA gyrase | DNA replication | −7.3 | −9.9 |
| ParE | Topoisomerase IV | DNA replication | −5.4 | −5.1 |
| Ddl | D-alanine ligase | Peptidoglycan synthesis | −4.1 | −4.8 |
| MurB | UDP-N-acetylglucosamine-enolpyruvyl reductase | Peptidoglycan synthesis | −6.1 | −5.5 |
| PBP2 | Peptidoglycan glycosyl transferase | Peptidoglycan synthesis | −3.6 | −3.8 |
| DHFR | Dihydrofolate reductase | Cellular regulation | −6.9 | −6.1 |
| YycG/YycF | Autolysis | Cellular regulation | −6.7 | −6.2 |
| FabF | B-ketoacyl-synthase I/II | Fatty acid synthesis | −3.6 | −3.5 |
| FabI | Enoly-acyl-carrier protein reductase | Fatty acid synthesis | −4.3 | −4.2 |
| LigA | DNA ligase | Stress response | −7.0 | −6.1 |
| TrxB | Thioredoxin reductase | Stress response | −5.9 | −5.0 |
MRSA DNA gyrase-B, pyruvate kinase, and topoisomerase IV inhibitions as IC50 and inhibition constant Ki values.
| Tested Compound | IC50 ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| DNA Gyrase | Pyruvate Kinase | Topoisomerase IV | |
|
| 11.4 ± 0.03 ( | 6.6 ± 0.05 ( | 33.17 ± 0.04 |
|
| 2.1 ± 0.08 ( | 23.2 ± 0.06 ( | 25.14 ± 0.03 |
|
| 0.12 ± 0.01 | * | 0.22 ± 0.01 |
a Values are the mean of three independent experiments. *—not determined.
Figure 5Docking study of 5-Tris (A,B) and 6-Tris (C,D) within the active site of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Gyr-B. The key binding interactions of the Gyr-B co-crystallized ligand [29] are shown in (E,F). The amino acid side chains are depicted in (A,C,E) for clarification.
Figure 6Docking study of 5-Tris (A,B) and 6-Tris (C,D) within the active site of MRSA PK. The key binding interactions of the PK co-crystallized ligand [21] are shown in (E,F). The amino acid side chains are depicted in (A,C,E) for clarification.
Predicted ADME profiles of 5-Tris and 6-Tris.
| Compound | Lipinski a | BBB b | GIT Absorption c | Solubility d | CYP2D6 e | Bioavailability Score f |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Yes | Yes | High | Moderate | Yes | 0.55 |
|
| Yes | Yes | High | Moderate | Yes | 0.55 |
a Predicts if the compound has a drug-like properties (follows the Lipinski rule of five); b Predicts the ability of the compound to penetrate the blood–brain barrier (BBB) according to the yolk of the boiled egg; c Predicts the gastrointestinal absorption according to the white of the boiled egg; d Predicts the solubility of each compound in water; e Predicts the cytochrome P450 inhibition; f Predicts the bioavailability score.
Predicted toxicity profile of 5-Tris and 6-Tris.
| Compound | 5-Tris | 6-Tris |
|---|---|---|
|
| Mutagen | Mutagen |
|
| Positive | Positive |
|
| Negative | Negative |
|
| Ambiguous | Moderate Risk |