| Literature DB >> 32375235 |
Reda F A Abdelhameed1, Eman S Habib1, Nermeen A Eltahawy1, Hashim A Hassanean1, Amany K Ibrahim1, Anber F Mohammed2, Shaimaa Fayez3,4, Alaa M Hayallah2,5, Koji Yamada6, Fathy A Behery7,8, Mohammad M Al-Sanea9, Sami I Alzarea10, Gerhard Bringmann3, Safwat A Ahmed1, Usama Ramadan Abdelmohsen11,12.
Abstract
Bioactivity-guided isolation supported by LC-HRESIMS metabolic profiling led to the isolation of two new compounds, a ceramide, stylissamide A (1), and a cerebroside, stylissoside A (2), from the methanol extract of the Red Sea sponge Stylissa carteri. Structure elucidation was achieved using spectroscopic techniques, including 1D and 2D NMR and HRMS. The bioactive extract's metabolomic profiling showed the existence of various secondary metabolites, mainly oleanane-type saponins, phenolic diterpenes, and lupane triterpenes. The in vitro cytotoxic activity of the isolated compounds was tested against two human cancer cell lines, MCF-7 and HepG2. Both compounds, 1 and 2, displayed strong cytotoxicity against the MCF-7 cell line, with IC50 values at 21.1 ± 0.17 µM and 27.5 ± 0.18 µM, respectively. They likewise showed a promising activity against HepG2 with IC50 at 36.8 ± 0.16 µM for 1 and IC50 30.5 ± 0.23 µM for 2 compared to the standard drug cisplatin. Molecular docking experiments showed that 1 and 2 displayed high affinity to the SET protein and to inhibitor 2 of protein phosphatase 2A (I2PP2A), which could be a possible mechanism for their cytotoxic activity. This paper spreads light on the role of these metabolites in holding fouling organisms away from the outer surface of the sponge, and the potential use of these defensive molecules in the production of novel anticancer agents.Entities:
Keywords: LC-HRESIMS; Stylissa carteri; ceramide; cerebroside; cytotoxic activity; docking
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32375235 PMCID: PMC7281077 DOI: 10.3390/md18050241
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Chemical structures of the newly isolated compounds: stylissamide A (1) and stylissoside A (2).
1H (400 MHz) and 13C NMR (100 MHz) for the new compounds 1 and 2 in C5D5N.
| 1 | 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position |
| Position |
| ||
| 1 | 4.43, dd (8.0, 4.8) | 61.8 | 1a | 4.32, m | 68.2 |
| 2 | 5.12, dd (8.0, 4.8) | 52.7 | 1b | 4.59, m | |
| 3 | 4.29, m | 76.5 | 2 | 5.29, m | 50.4 |
| 4 | 4.62, m | 72.7 | 3 | 4.39, m | 76.5 |
| 5 | 1.25, m | 30.2 | 4 | 4.28, m | 72.3 |
| 6 | 1.25, m | 30.0 | 5 | 1.27, m | 31.9 |
| 7–14 | 1.25, m | 29.7 | 6 | 1.27, m | 30.2 |
| 15 | 1.25, m | 29.9 | 7-18 | 1.27, m | 29.9 |
| 16 | 1.25, m | 22.7 | 19 | 0.85, t (6.8) | 14.2 |
| 17 | 0.85, t (6.8) | 14.1 | 1′ | - | 175.0 |
| 1′ | - | 175.0 | 2′ | 4.63, m | 72.4 |
| 2′ | 4.37, m | 72.2 | 3′ | 2.00, m | 31.9 |
| 3′ | 2.05, m | 30.2 | 4′ | 1.27, m | 30.2 |
| 4′ | 1.25, m | 30.0 | 5′–20′ | 1.27, m | 29.9 |
| 5′13′ | 1.25, m | 29.7 | 21′ | 0.85, t (6.8) | 14.2 |
| 14′ | 1.25, m | 22.7 | NH | 8.53, d (8.4) | - |
| 15′ | 0.85, t (6.8) | 14.1 | 1′′ | 5.61, d (3.4) | 101.2 |
| NH | 8.59, d (8.4) | 2′′ | 4.64, m | 70.2 | |
| 3′′ | 4.50, m | 71.6 | |||
| 4′′ | 4.54, m | 71.0 | |||
| 5′′ | 4.50, m | 73.1 | |||
| 6′′ | 4.33, m | 62.6 | |||
Figure 2Key 1H-1H COSY (bold) and HMBC (arrows) correlations in compound 1.
Figure 3Key 1H-1H COSY (bold) and HMBC (arrows) correlations for compound 2.
Figure 4Chemical structures of the annotated metabolites from Stylissa carteri, cyercene (3), plakortone G (4), pedicellic acid (5), spongia-13(16),14-dien-19-al (6), plakortin (7), spongia-13(16),14-dien-19-oic acid (8), 9,10,11-trihydroxy-(12Z)-12-octadecenoic acid (9), benzylthiocrellidone (10), methyl aeruginosate C (11), and salarin B (12).
Dereplicated metabolites from Stylissa carteri.
| RT (min) | MZMine ID | Molecular Weight | Name | Source | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.108521 | 209 | 234.1261 | Cyercene ( | Mollusca | [ |
| 2 | 10.04907 | 57 | 278.2253 | Plakortone G ( | Porifera | [ |
| 3 | 8.3637 | 13 | 314.2445 | Pedicellic acid ( |
| [ |
| 4 | 10.10114 | 263 | 300.2095 | Spongia-13(16),14-dien-19-al ( | Porifera | [ |
| 5 | 7.916396 | 12 | 312.2289 | Plakortin ( |
| [ |
| 6 | 8.382825 | 227 | 316.2043 | Spongia-13(16),14-dien-19-oic acid ( | Porifera | [ |
| 7 | 6.245154 | 20 | 330.2394 | 9,10,11-Trihydroxy-(12 | Chinese truffle | [ |
| 8 | 3.509688 | 291 | 412.1711 | Benzylthiocrellidone ( | Porifera | [ |
| 9 | 13.7787 | 225 | 676.4528 | Methyl aeruginosate C ( |
| [ |
| 10 | 13.4309 | 228 | 720.3484 | Salarin B ( | Porifera | [ |
IC50 values of compounds 1 and 2 on breast (MCF-7) and liver (HEPG2) cancer cell lines.
| HepG2 | MCF-7 | |
|---|---|---|
| IC50 (µM) | ||
|
| 36.8 ± 0.16 | 21.1 ± 0.17 |
|
| 30.5 ± 0.23 | 27.5 ± 0.18 |
| Cisplatin | 21.3 ± 0.40 | 15.3 ± 0.10 |
Each data point represents the mean ± SD of four independent experiments (significant differences at p < 0.05).
Figure 5The top generated pose of the induced fit docking simulation oriented C18 ceramide (green) in an extended conformation along the space between the helix of the dimerization domain and the β sheets of the SET structure, which was further used as a generated active site for the docking simulations of compounds 1 and 2 within the SET protein.
Figure 6Docking of compounds 1 (A) and 2 (B) within the SET oncoprotein active site.