Literature DB >> 32089611

Nasogastric tube in anterior cervical spine surgery, is it necessary?

Arvind Gopalrao Kulkarni1, Tushar Satish Kunder1, Ashwinkumar V Khandge1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this article was to verify the utility of nasogastric (NG) tube in primary anterior cervical surgeries. Palpating and identifying the NG tube introduced during induction is one of the ways of preventing esophageal injuries during surgery. It may also be used as a conduit for postoperative feeding. However, the use of NG tube is not without complications. Esophageal perforation is one of them, with an incidence of 0.3%.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed of patients who underwent a primary anterior cervical spine surgery from January 2007 to July 2017 by a single surgeon. The indications were degenerative, trauma, infection, and neoplasia. NG tube was avoided in all cases. The patients were followed for 6 months.
RESULTS: Our study included 356 patients (201 males and 155 females), with a mean age of 43.6 years (18-92 years) and a mean follow-up of 6 months. We had only one case of esophageal perforation (0.28%) attributed to a traumatic burst fracture.
CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the use of a NG tube in primary anterior cervical spine surgery can be avoided. Comprehensive knowledge of anatomy and meticulous dissection may avoid the disastrous complication of esophageal rupture. This way the discomfort and complications associated with NG tube can be avoided. Copyright:
© 2020 Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; Cervical spinal cord; Esophageal perforation; Myelopathy; Spinal fusion; anterior cervical spine surgery; esophageal perforation; nasogastric tube; total disc replacement

Year:  2020        PMID: 32089611      PMCID: PMC7008665          DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_83_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine        ISSN: 0974-8237


INTRODUCTION

Anterior approach to the cervical spine has gained popularity among spine surgeons since it was first described in the 1950s.[1] Excellent exposure, versatility, and low rates of adverse effects were the advantages.[23456] However, owing to the complex and vital anatomy surrounding the cervical spine, rare catastrophic complications may occur and prove fatal, esophageal perforation being one of the rarer ones, with an incidence of 0.3%.[7] Esophageal perforation is a nightmare for the spine surgeon, as it can be rapidly fatal, with mortality rates as high as 50%.[89] Preoperative nasogastric (NG) intubation allowing palpation of the tube and identification of the esophagus intraoperatively has been proposed in literature as a preventive measure against this dreaded complication.[1011] However, there is no published evidence suggesting any success or significance of this claim. Furthermore, NG intubation is rife with complications [Table 1].[1213] The aim of this article was to verify the utility of the NG tube in anterior cervical surgeries for varied indications.
Table 1

Complications of nasogastric intubation

Nasopharyngeal complications[1415]
 Rhinitis (sore and runny nose)
 Sore throat
 Dry mouth
Thoracic complications[1620]
 Pneumonia
 Atelectasis
 Pneumothorax
 Empyema
 Sepsis
 Hemorrhage
Nonthoracic complications[132124]
 Knotting
 Impaction
 Double backing and kinking
 Obstruction
 Rupture
 Breakage
 Perforation of viscus
 Intracranial entry
Complications of nasogastric intubation

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery in our institute from November 2007 to January 2017 was performed. Indications included degenerative disease, trauma, infections, and neoplasms. Patients with single- and multi-level surgeries were included. The institutional review board approval was sought before study initiation. All surgeries were performed by the same surgical team. As a policy, NG tube was avoided in all cases. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 6 months to rule out any delayed esophageal rupture. Standard Smith and Robinson technique was employed for surgery. Demographic data inclusive of age, sex, and body mass index were collected for all patients. Preoperative data was collected and tabulated [Table 2]. We obtained the number of levels fused, duration of operation, length of hospital stays, and mean blood loss [Table 3]. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS software 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Table 2

Demographics and comorbidities (n=356)

Demographics and co-morbiditiesMean
Patient demographics
 Age (years)43.6 (18-92)
 Female: male201:155
 BMI (kg/m2)27.4
Comorbidities, n (%)
 Hypertension144 (40.5)
 Diabetes mellitus83 (23.3)
 Anticoagulant medication47.3 (13.3)
 Smoking55 (15.6)
 Alcohol38 (10.6)

BMI - Body mass index

Table 3

Patient outcomes (n=356)

Outcomesn
Number of levels
 One level203
 Two levels55
 Three levels24
 Four levels13
Etiology
 Degenerative265
 Trauma63
 Infection13
 Neoplasia15
Blood loss (cc)140.25
Surgical time (min)172.03
Duration of hospital stay (days)3 (2-5)
Demographics and comorbidities (n=356) BMI - Body mass index Patient outcomes (n=356)

RESULTS

A total of 356 patients were analyzed (201 males and 155 females). There were 203 single-level, 55 double-level, 24 three-level, 13 four-level discectomy and fusion surgeries; 30 corpectomies; and 31 total disc replacement surgeries [Table 2]. The mean age group was 43.6 years (18–92 years). The mean operative time was 172.03 min. The mean estimated blood loss was 140.25 cc. The mean duration of hospital stay was 3 days[2345] [Table 3]. As a policy, we did not stop antiplatelet medication in any patient. In this study, there was one patient with a traumatic burst fracture of C5 vertebral body who developed an esophageal perforation (0.28%).

DISCUSSION

Esophageal perforation is a dreaded complication in anterior cervical spine surgery owing to the postoperative morbidity and mortality of as high as 50%.[89] However, the incidence of the said complication is minimal in anterior spine surgery. Hershman et al. in their multicentric retrospective case series had only two cases of perforation among 9591 anterior cervical procedures (0.02%).[25] Fountas et al. reviewed that 1015 primary anterior cervical surgeries reported only three perforations (0.2%).[4] Lu et al. reported only six esophageal perforations in 1045 (0.5%) anterior cervical surgeries in a 10-year period.[26] The prevention strategy proposed in literature of palpating a NG tube to delineate the esophagus in surgery[1011] is itself flawed due to the absence of any evidence-based study supporting this proposal. The insertion of an NG tube is considered a simple and a safe procedure. A NG tube is used in cases of postoperative dysphagia in anterior cervical procedures with the risk of aspiration.[27] Literature also specifies its use in revision anterior spine surgery.[11] However, the complications which can arise from NG tube insertion are many Table 1. Desmond et al. in their prospective case series showed the evidence of rhinitis in 75% of the patients who received an NG tube.[14] Padilla et al. in their study interviewed patients about the distresses of NG tube feeding, and the most common experiences were sore nose or throat, dry mouth, and runny nose.[15] Paul et al. in their case report described a patient having severe epistaxis following NG tube insertion which required arterial embolism.[28] Tube knotting, impaction in the posterior nasopharynx, double backing, kinking, rupture and breakage are a few other complications.[29] Rarely, serious complications may also occur, and Ferrer et al. in their study concluded that NG tube feeding in stroke patients is a significant cause of aspiration pneumonia. Teramoto et al. in their study also concluded that NG tube feeding is a cause of aspiration pneumonia in ventilated patients.[3031] A famous musician Maurice Murphy succumbed to a misplaced NG tube.[32] There also have been isolated case reports by Psarras et al., Roka et al., Freij and Mullett, and Metheny about inadvertent intracranial insertion of a NG tube, and 33 cases have been reported in published literature about this complication.[21222333] Approximately one-third of the patients with spinal cord injury also suffer from head injuries, thus making this complication important.[34] Placement of a NG tube into the pulmonary tree is a well-known complication, with an incidence of 0.3%–15%,[35] and there have been various case reports identifying this complication by Schreiber et al., Thomas et al., and Moorthy.[161736] The comprehensive knowledge of anatomy and meticulous surgical technique should alert the surgeon on the position of the esophagus rather than palpation of an NG tube. Several anatomic layers must be disrupted to perforate the esophagus.[37] Careful initial exposure with judicious retractor placement has been suggested to help minimize esophageal injury.[3] The careful placement of the retractor blades under the Longus colli muscle can help prevent inadvertent escape of the esophagus during the procedure.[38] Cautious use of the high-speed burr and the use of sleeved electrocautery have also been advocated to reduce esophageal complications. Esophageal rupture due to traumatic fractures of the spine constitutes approximately 1% of esophageal ruptures.[39] Apart from the one isolated case of esophageal rupture in this study which may be attributed to the burst fracture, the incidence of esophageal perforation in anterior cervical surgery in this series was nil.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the use of a NG tube in primary anterior cervical spine surgery can be avoided. Comprehensive knowledge of anatomy and meticulous dissection may avoid the disastrous complication of esophageal rupture. This way the discomfort and complications associated with NG tube can be avoided.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  31 in total

1.  Thoracoscopic extraction of a Dobbhoff feeding tube knotted in the pleural space.

Authors:  S J Korkola; W Stansfield; G Belley; D S Mulder
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Nasogastric tube feeding is a cause of aspiration pneumonia in ventilated patients.

Authors:  S Teramoto; T Ishii; H Yamamoto; Y Yamaguchi; Y Ouchi
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 16.671

3.  Thoracic complications of nasogastric tube: review of safe practice.

Authors:  Jain Bhaskara Pillai; Annette Vegas; Stephanie Brister
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2005-06-21

Review 4.  Adverse events associated with anterior cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Alan H Daniels; K Daniel Riew; J U Yoo; Alexander Ching; Keith R Birchard; Andy J Kranenburg; Robert A Hart
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Accidental intravascular placement of a feeding tube.

Authors:  L Düthorn; H Schulte Steinberg; H Häuser; G Neeser; P Pracki
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Accidental pneumothorax from a nasogastric tube.

Authors:  B Thomas; D Cummin; R E Falcone
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-10-24       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Esophageal perforation following anterior cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  K E Newhouse; R W Lindsey; C R Clark; J Lieponis; M J Murphy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Severe epistaxis after nasogastric tube insertion requiring arterial embolisation.

Authors:  Vishesh Paul; Yizhak Kupfer; Sidney Tessler
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-01-18

9.  Aetiology, treatment and mortality after oesophageal perforation in Denmark.

Authors:  Philip Ryom; Jesper Bohsen Ravn; Luit Penninga; Susanne Schmidt; Maria Gerding Iversen; Peter Skov-Olsen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Dan Med Bull       Date:  2011-05

10.  Dysphonia, dysphagia, and esophageal injuries after anterior cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Gbolahan O Okubadejo; Justin B Hohl; William F Donaldson
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2009
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.