OBJECTIVES: Esophageal perforation complicating anterior cervical spine surgery is a potentially fatal complication. Early identification and immediate treatment may lower adverse effects for the patient. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of intraesophageal dye injection to detect an esophageal injury and to test two novel techniques. METHOD: Ten cadaveric specimens were dissected using an anteromedial Smith-Robinson approach. Each was sequentially tested by a control and three dye injection techniques: technique A: nasogastric tube alone; technique B: nasogastric tube plus a distally placed Foley catheter; technique C: proximal plus a distally placed Foley catheter. Each technique was tested against esophageal perforations created by needle puncture (21-gauge, 18-gauge, and 14-gauge) and by a 2-mm high-speed burr. Dye visualization was independently graded as present or absent by two authors. RESULTS: In the control trial, no dye leak was visualized in any of the 10 specimens. In technique A, 0 of 10 21-gauge perforations, 1 of 10 18-gauge perforations, 2 of 10 14-gauge perforations, and 6 of 10 burr perforations were visualized. In technique B, 1 of 10 21-gauge perforations, 8 of 10 18-gauge perforations, 9 of 10 14-gauge perforations, and 9 of 10 burr perforations were visualized. In technique C, 0 of 10 21-gauge perforations, 9 of 10 18-gauge perforations, 10 of 10 14-gauge perforations, and 7 of 10 burr perforations were visualized. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that intraesophageal dye injection via nasogastric tube alone should not be relied upon to exclude the presence of esophageal perforation. Two novel techniques showed an improved, though limited, capability of detecting esophageal perforations.
OBJECTIVES: Esophageal perforation complicating anterior cervical spine surgery is a potentially fatal complication. Early identification and immediate treatment may lower adverse effects for the patient. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of intraesophageal dye injection to detect an esophageal injury and to test two novel techniques. METHOD: Ten cadaveric specimens were dissected using an anteromedial Smith-Robinson approach. Each was sequentially tested by a control and three dye injection techniques: technique A: nasogastric tube alone; technique B: nasogastric tube plus a distally placed Foley catheter; technique C: proximal plus a distally placed Foley catheter. Each technique was tested against esophageal perforations created by needle puncture (21-gauge, 18-gauge, and 14-gauge) and by a 2-mm high-speed burr. Dye visualization was independently graded as present or absent by two authors. RESULTS: In the control trial, no dye leak was visualized in any of the 10 specimens. In technique A, 0 of 10 21-gauge perforations, 1 of 10 18-gauge perforations, 2 of 10 14-gauge perforations, and 6 of 10 burr perforations were visualized. In technique B, 1 of 10 21-gauge perforations, 8 of 10 18-gauge perforations, 9 of 10 14-gauge perforations, and 9 of 10 burr perforations were visualized. In technique C, 0 of 10 21-gauge perforations, 9 of 10 18-gauge perforations, 10 of 10 14-gauge perforations, and 7 of 10 burr perforations were visualized. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that intraesophageal dye injection via nasogastric tube alone should not be relied upon to exclude the presence of esophageal perforation. Two novel techniques showed an improved, though limited, capability of detecting esophageal perforations.
Authors: Stuart H Hershman; William A Kunkle; Michael P Kelly; Jacob M Buchowski; Wilson Z Ray; David B Bumpass; Jeffrey L Gum; Colleen M Peters; Weerasak Singhatanadgige; Jin Young Kim; Zachary A Smith; Wellington K Hsu; Ahmad Nassr; Bradford L Currier; Ra'Kerry K Rahman; Robert E Isaacs; Justin S Smith; Christopher Shaffrey; Sara E Thompson; Jeffrey C Wang; Elizabeth L Lord; Zorica Buser; Paul M Arnold; Michael G Fehlings; Thomas E Mroz; K Daniel Riew Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2017-04-01