Literature DB >> 110954

Subjective distresses of nasogastric tube feeding.

G V Padilla, M Grant, H Wong, B W Hansen, R L Hanson, N Bergstrom, W R Kubo.   

Abstract

Health care professionals assume that tube feeding is an unpleasant, distressing experience for patients, which is only partially substantiated by experience. Thirty patients were interviewed via a tube feeding and hospital experience checklist (a 47-item interview schedule). Common experiences were operationally defined as those felt by at least 50%; subjectively distressful experiences were those identified by patients as causing distress. The most common and most distressful experiences of nasogastric tube feeding were: sensory irritations and sensory deprivation. The psychosensory irritation experiences were: thirst, sore nose or throat, dry mouth, runny nose, a tube in the nose, taking food through a tube, breathing through the mouth, breathing with a tube in the nose, taking food in a treatment type container, and taking food with a different texture and smell than usual. The psychosensory deprivation experiences were: an unsatisfied appetite for certain foods, deprivation of tasting, chewing, swallowing food, and drinking liquids, limited mobility, and deprivation of regular food. Except for burping, gastrointestinal symptoms were not common though they were usually distressful. This information has been used to develop teaching programs which are being tested for effectiveness in reducing distress associated with nasogastric tube feeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 110954     DOI: 10.1177/014860717900300204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr        ISSN: 0148-6071            Impact factor:   4.016


  5 in total

Review 1.  Malignant disease: nutritional implications of disease and treatment.

Authors:  S Holmes; J W Dickerson
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.264

2.  Quality of life and home enteral tube feeding: a French prospective study in patients with head and neck or oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  C Roberge; M Tran; C Massoud; B Poirée; N Duval; E Damecour; D Frout; D Malvy; F Joly; P Lebailly; M Henry-Amar
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.640

3.  Nutri-jelly may improve quality of life and decrease tube feeding demand in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Dunyaporn Trachootham; Wasinee Songkaew; Buakhao Hongsachum; Chodchoi Wattana; Nanchaporn Changkluengdee; Jandanee Karapoch; Sureerat Thirdsuttironnapumi; Ekapop Meennuch; Chonsanee Klaitong; Tanadej Sinthusek; Aroonwan Lam-ubol
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Underrecognition and undertreatment of thirst among hospitalized patients with restricted oral feeding and drinking.

Authors:  Vanda Ho; Gordon Goh; Xuan Rong Tang; Kay Choong See
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Nasogastric tube in anterior cervical spine surgery, is it necessary?

Authors:  Arvind Gopalrao Kulkarni; Tushar Satish Kunder; Ashwinkumar V Khandge
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2020-01-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.