Literature DB >> 32082759

Wound care of the driveline exit site in patients with a ventricular assist device: A systematic review.

Zeliha Özdemir1, Sevilay Şenol Çelik1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to systematically define and analyze the studies on driveline exit site care methods for patients with a ventricular assist device.
METHODS: The studies related to driveline exit site care of the patients with a ventricular assist device published in English and Turkish between 2008 and 2017 were reviewed from the international Science Direct, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the national databases. Of a total of 83 articles, a total of seven research articles which met the inclusion criteria were included in the study.
RESULTS: Findings related to the agents used in the cleaning of the driveline exit site, dressing closures, dressing change frequency, and use of driveline anchoring devices were obtained from studies included in the research. It was found that chlorhexidine solution for skin cleaning and sterile gauze sheets and transparent covering for dressing closure were the most preferred methods for the driveline exit site care. Dressing change frequency varied considerably from center to center and anchoring devices were used in all studies.
CONCLUSION: There is no gold standard method for the driveline exit site care of patients with a ventricular assist device and researches on the driveline exit site care seem to be limited. It is recommended that large-scale, randomized-controlled studies should be conducted which would provide a stronger proof of the driveline exit site care.
Copyright © 2018, Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Care; dressing; driveline exit site; ventricular assist device

Year:  2018        PMID: 32082759      PMCID: PMC7024132          DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.14982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg        ISSN: 1301-5680            Impact factor:   0.332


  18 in total

1.  Importance of early appropriate intervention including antibiotics and wound care for device-related infection in patients with left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  M Hieda; M Sata; O Seguchi; M Yanase; Y Murata; T Sato; H Sunami; S Nakajima; T Watanabe; Y Hori; K Wada; H Hata; T Fujita; J Kobayashi; T Nakatani
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 2.  Technique for minimizing and treating driveline infections.

Authors:  Leora T Yarboro; James D Bergin; Jamie L W Kennedy; Carole C Ballew; Emily M Benton; Gorav Ailawadi; John A Kern
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-11

3.  Driveline infections in left ventricular assist devices: implications for destination therapy.

Authors:  Vikas Sharma; Salil V Deo; John M Stulak; Lucian A Durham; Richard C Daly; Soon J Park; Larry M Baddour; Kashish Mehra; Lyle D Joyce
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Reduction in driveline infection rates: Results from the HeartMate II Multicenter Driveline Silicone Skin Interface (SSI) Registry.

Authors:  David Dean; Faouzi Kallel; Gregory A Ewald; Antony Tatooles; Brett C Sheridan; Robert J Brewer; Christian Caldeira; David J Farrar; Shahab A Akhter
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy: a new look at survival.

Authors:  Soon J Park; Alfred Tector; William Piccioni; Edward Raines; Annetine Gelijns; Alan Moskowitz; Eric Rose; William Holman; Satoshi Furukawa; O Howard Frazier; Walter Dembitsky
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Infection in permanent circulatory support: experience from the REMATCH trial.

Authors:  William L Holman; Soon J Park; James W Long; Alan Weinberg; Lopa Gupta; Anita R Tierney; Robert M Adamson; John D Watson; Edward P Raines; Gregory S Couper; Francis D Pagani; Nelson A Burton; Leslie W Miller; Yoshifumi Naka
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 7.  Left ventricular assist device-related infections: past, present and future.

Authors:  Sanjay Maniar; Sreekanth Kondareddy; Veli K Topkara
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.166

8.  Outcomes and Readmissions After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device: Heartmate II Versus Heartware Ventricular Assist Device.

Authors:  O N Tuncer; C Kemaloğlu; O Erbasan; I Gölbaşı; C Türkay; Ö Bayezid
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Seventh INTERMACS annual report: 15,000 patients and counting.

Authors:  James K Kirklin; David C Naftel; Francis D Pagani; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Elizabeth D Blume; Susan L Myers; Marissa A Miller; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Reduce Driveline Trauma Through Stabilization and Exit Site Management: 30 Days Feasibility Results from the Multicenter RESIST Study.

Authors:  Marcia Stahovich; Kartik S Sundareswaran; Sarah Fox; William Hallinan; Peggy Blood; Leway Chen; Salpy V Pamboukian; Raymond Chinn; David J Farrar; Francis D Pagani; Laura Blue
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.