| Literature DB >> 32082446 |
Tuba Selcuk Can1,2, Gulfidan Uzan3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) are the mainstay imaging methods in the evaluation and follow-up of pulmonary nodules. But they both have high radiation risk for patients. Diffusion- weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI), on the other hand, is a radiation free imaging method that gives information about the biological structure of tissues at the molecular level by measuring random movement of water in biological tissues. In this prospective study we aimed to compare the computed tomography characteristics of the nodules in terms of malignancy and to compare the accuracy of DW-MRI and PET/CT results in those patients.Entities:
Keywords: diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; lung cancer; solitary pulmonary nodule
Year: 2019 PMID: 32082446 PMCID: PMC7016491 DOI: 10.5114/pjr.2019.91200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pol J Radiol ISSN: 1733-134X
Thoracic diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging acquisition parameters
| Imaging parameters | |
|---|---|
| TR/TE (ms) | 2600/65 |
| TI (ms) | 180 |
| In-plane resolution | 4.4 x 5.5 x 5 |
| NSA | 3 |
| Matrix | 92 |
| FOV | 425 x 278 |
| EPI-factor | 21 |
| B-values (s/mm2) | 0-500 |
| Acquisition time | < 120 |
Figure 1Image examples of a 57-year-old patient with small cell carcinoma of the right lower lobe. A) Thorax contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan (mediastinal window setting), B) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the tumor with hyperintensity, C) corresponding ADC map appearing as a low signal intensity (ADCmin = 0.82 × 10−3 mm2/s) and D) combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography of the same patient with a maximum standardised uptake values of 12.4
Figure 2Pathological diagnosis of nodules (%)
Correlation between PET-SUVmax and DAG-ADC values
| DAG-ADC (minimum) | DAG-ADC (maximum) | DAG-ADC (average) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PET-SUVmax value of lung mass | –0.631 | 0.0001*** | –0.619 | 0.0001*** | –0.616 | 0.0001*** |
| PET-SUVmax value of mediastinal LAP | –0.389 | 0.001** | –0.417 | 0.0001*** | –0.420 | 0.0001*** |
| PET-SUVmax value of hilar LAP | –0.319 | 0.005** | –0.374 | 0.001** | –0.378 | 0.001** |
Figure 3ROC analysis of PET SUVmax of lung mass/nodule for the distinction of benign and malign nodules
Figure 4ROC analysis of magnetic resonance for the distinction of benign and malign nodules