Literature DB >> 32080922

Mixed ancestry from wild and domestic lineages contributes to the rapid expansion of invasive feral swine.

Timothy J Smyser1, Michael A Tabak2,3, Chris Slootmaker1, Michael S Robeson1,4, Ryan S Miller2, Mirte Bosse5, Hendrik-Jan Megens5, Martien A M Groenen5, Samuel Rezende Paiva6, Danielle Assis de Faria6, Harvey D Blackburn6, Brandon S Schmit7, Antoinette J Piaggio1.   

Abstract

Invasive alien species are a significant threat to both economic and ecological systems. Identifying the processes that give rise to invasive populations is essential for implementing effective control strategies. We conducted an ancestry analysis of invasive feral swine (Sus scrofa, Linnaeus, 1758), a highly destructive ungulate that is widely distributed throughout the contiguous United States, to describe introduction pathways, sources of newly emergent populations and processes contributing to an ongoing invasion. Comparisons of high-density single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes for 6,566 invasive feral swine to a comprehensive reference set of S. scrofa revealed that the vast majority of feral swine were of mixed ancestry, with dominant genetic associations to Western heritage breeds of domestic pig and European populations of wild boar. Further, the rapid expansion of invasive feral swine over the past 30 years was attributable to secondary introductions from established populations of admixed ancestry as opposed to direct introductions of domestic breeds or wild boar. Spatially widespread genetic associations of invasive feral swine to European wild boar deviated strongly from historical S. scrofa introduction pressure, which was largely restricted to domestic pigs with infrequent, localized wild boar releases. The deviation between historical introduction pressure and contemporary genetic ancestry suggests wild boar-hybridization may contribute to differential fitness in the environment and heightened invasive potential for individuals of admixed domestic pig-wild boar ancestry.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Sus scrofazzm321990; admixture; feral swine; invasive species; secondary introductions

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32080922     DOI: 10.1111/mec.15392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  5 in total

1.  Genetic Population Structure of Wild Pigs in Southern Texas.

Authors:  Johanna Delgado-Acevedo; Angeline Zamorano; Randy W DeYoung; Tyler A Campbell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Loci Associated With Antibody Response in Feral Swine (Sus scrofa) Infected With Brucella suis.

Authors:  Courtney F Pierce; Vienna R Brown; Steven C Olsen; Paola Boggiatto; Kerri Pedersen; Ryan S Miller; Scott E Speidel; Timothy J Smyser
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-11-25

3.  Introgression dynamics from invasive pigs into wild boar following the March 2011 natural and anthropogenic disasters at Fukushima.

Authors:  Donovan Anderson; Yuki Negishi; Hiroko Ishiniwa; Kei Okuda; Thomas G Hinton; Rio Toma; Junco Nagata; Hidetoshi B Tamate; Shingo Kaneko
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Population genomics for wildlife conservation and management.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; W Chris Funk; Om P Rajora
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Influence of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes on neonate survival in an invasive large mammal.

Authors:  Sarah M Chinn; John C Kilgo; Mark A Vukovich; James C Beasley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.