Literature DB >> 33445721

Genetic Population Structure of Wild Pigs in Southern Texas.

Johanna Delgado-Acevedo1, Angeline Zamorano2, Randy W DeYoung2, Tyler A Campbell3.   

Abstract

Wild pigs (Sus scrofa) alter ecosystems, affect the economy, and carry diseases that can be transmitted to livestock, humans, and wildlife. Understanding wild pig movements and population structure data, including natural population boundaries and dispersal, may potentially increase the efficiency and effectiveness of management actions. We trapped, conducted aerial shootings, and hunted wild pigs from 2005 to 2009 in southern Texas. We used microsatellites to assist large-scale applied management. We quantify broad-scale population structure among 24 sites across southern Texas by computing an overall Fst value, and a Bayesian clustering algorithm both with and without considering the spatial location of samples. At a broad geographic scale, pig populations displayed a moderate degree of genetic structure (Fst = 0.11). The best partition for number of populations, based on 2nd order rate of change of the likelihood distribution, was K = 10 genetic clusters. The spatially explicit Bayesian clustering algorithm produced similar results, with minor differences in designation of admixed sites. We found evidence of past (and possibly ongoing) translocations; many populations were admixed. Our original goal was to identify landscape features, such as barriers or dispersal corridors, that could be used to aid management. Unfortunately, the extensive admixture among clusters made this impossible. This research shows that large-scale management of wild pigs may be necessary to achieve control and ameliorate damages. Reduction or cessation of translocations is necessary to prevent human-mediated dispersion of wild pigs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sus scrofa; genetic population structure; invasive species; wild pig

Year:  2021        PMID: 33445721      PMCID: PMC7828165          DOI: 10.3390/ani11010168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animals (Basel)        ISSN: 2076-2615            Impact factor:   2.752


  27 in total

1.  BAPS 2: enhanced possibilities for the analysis of genetic population structure.

Authors:  Jukka Corander; Patrik Waldmann; Pekka Marttinen; Mikko J Sillanpää
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Isolation by Distance.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1943-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Multiple sources, admixture, and genetic variation in introduced anolis lizard populations.

Authors:  Jason J Kolbe; Richard E Glor; Lourdes Rodríguez Schettino; Ada Chamizo Lara; Allan Larson; Jonathan B Losos
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.560

4.  High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic to Morocco.

Authors:  A El Mousadik; R J Petit
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers.

Authors:  Thibaut Jombart
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

7.  Evaluation of baits for oral vaccination of European wild boar piglets.

Authors:  Cristina Ballesteros; Christian Gortázar; Mario Canales; Joaquín Vicente; Angelo Lasagna; José A Gamarra; Ricardo Carrasco-García; José de la Fuente
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 2.534

8.  Mixed ancestry from wild and domestic lineages contributes to the rapid expansion of invasive feral swine.

Authors:  Timothy J Smyser; Michael A Tabak; Chris Slootmaker; Michael S Robeson; Ryan S Miller; Mirte Bosse; Hendrik-Jan Megens; Martien A M Groenen; Samuel Rezende Paiva; Danielle Assis de Faria; Harvey D Blackburn; Brandon S Schmit; Antoinette J Piaggio
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 9.  The Effects of Interaction between Climate Change and Land-Use/Cover Change on Biodiversity-Related Ecosystem Services.

Authors:  Xinyue He; Jie Liang; Guangming Zeng; Yujie Yuan; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Glob Chall       Date:  2019-05-06

10.  Bait Preference of Free-Ranging Feral Swine for Delivery of a Novel Toxicant.

Authors:  Nathan P Snow; Joseph M Halseth; Michael J Lavelle; Thomas E Hanson; Chad R Blass; Justin A Foster; Simon T Humphrys; Linton D Staples; David G Hewitt; Kurt C VerCauteren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.