Literature DB >> 32080121

The maximum standardized uptake value and extent of peritoneal involvement may predict the prognosis of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after primary treatment: A retrospective clinical study.

Yuanyuan Jiang1,2, Guozhu Hou1,2, Fengyu Wu3, Zhaohui Zhu1,2, Wei Zhang4, Wuying Cheng1,2.   

Abstract

We investigated the effect of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and peritoneal dissemination derived from F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging on prognosis in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.We retrospectively analyzed 145 patients with suspected recurrent ovarian cancer who had undergone F-FDG PET/CT scans after cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy. The degree of peritoneal spread was classified as localized (1-3 FDG foci) or diffuse (>3 FDG foci). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the cut-off values for predicting recurrence.A total of 145 patients were retrospectively reviewed in this study. 29 patients were excluded as their follow-up results were not available. One hundred sixteen patients were included in the final analysis. The median duration of progression-free survival was 14 months. F-FDG PET/CT detected peritoneal carcinomatosis in 82 patients. With a cut-off SUVmax of 2.0 obtained from the ROC curve analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of SUVmax of peritoneal carcinomatosis for predicting recurrence were 77.6%, 87.5%, 65.1%, 97.4%, and 38.9%, respectively. The area under the curve was 0.85. In a multivariate analysis, significant independent prognostic variables were SUVmax of peritoneal disease, peritoneal dissemination, and CA125 levels. In patients with peritoneal involvement, the Kaplan-Meier survival curves showed significantly longer PFS in those with localized disease.SUVmax of peritoneal disease is valuable in predicting the recurrence of ovarian cancer. SUVmax of peritoneal disease, peritoneal dissemination and CA125 level could be used as independent prognostic factors for ovarian cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32080121      PMCID: PMC7034678          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.817


Introduction

Ovarian cancer is the most commonly diagnosed gynecologic malignancy and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women.[ The symptoms of ovarian cancer are nonspecific, and most cases are detected at advanced stages. Standard treatment of advanced ovarian cancer includes aggressive cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy. Approximately 20% to 30% of patients with early-stage disease and 50% to 75% of patients with late-stage disease tend to recur despite adequate primary therapy. Metastases usually occur as a result of peritoneal, lymphangitic, or hematogenous spread of the tumor, with the peritoneal route being the most common.[ The clinical follow-up generally includes measurement of the serum cancer antigen CA125, physical examination, and imaging examinations. Serum CA125 is elevated in more than 90% of patients with late-stage disease, but is nonspecific, as normal levels cannot be reliable to exclude recurrence, and elevated values cannot differentiate between localized and diffuse tumor recurrence. Computed tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT are the most commonly used imaging modalities in patients with suspected recurrent ovarian cancer.[ However, small peritoneal deposits are difficult to detect with CT and MRI because of the anatomical changes due to treatment and field of view limitations. 18F-FDG PET/CT helps in detecting these foci, especially in cases where CA125 levels are rising, but conventional imaging studies show negative or equivocal findings.[ Metabolic characterization of ovarian cancer by PET/CT has resulted in reports of several potential prognostic factors.[ However, most were reported in a pre-treatment stage, with limited data available about the post-treatment stage. We hypothesized that tumor metabolic parameters might be useful as prognostic markers that may predict recurrence or progression-free survival (PFS).

Materials and methods

Patients

A retrospective analysis of 145 patients suspected of recurrent ovarian cancer was performed. Inclusion criteria were as follows: the patients suspected of recurrent ovarian cancer due to clinical symptoms or elevated CA125 levels; the CT or MRI results before the PET/CT scan were negative or equivocal; the primary tumor was removed by surgery before the PET/CT scan. All patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scans for further evaluation. Follow-up results were confirmed at pathologic examination after exploratory surgery or further information from clinical follow-up (positive findings in vaginal and/or abdominal ultrasound, further increase in tumor marker levels without therapy, a morphologic response to chemotherapy or a decrease in the patients’ clinical condition). Twenty-nine patients were excluded from the final analysis because follow-up data after the scan were not available. The degree of peritoneal spread was classified as localized (1–3 focal sites of 18F-FDG uptake) or diffuse (more than 3 sites of 18F-FDG uptakes). Stage was confirmed according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. The histological cell types were classified according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification.[

PET/CT technique and image analysis

All patients fasted for at least 4 hours before PET/CT acquisition. Serum glucose levels measured at the time of 18F-FDG injections were less than 150 mg/dL in all patients. A PET/CT scan consisted of five-bed positions with 2 minutes per table position from the skull base to the femoral region 60 minutes after intravenous injection of 5.55 MBq/kg body weight 18F-FDG was performed. PET data were acquired in three-dimensional mode. CT was performed before the PET, and the resulting data were used to generate an attenuation correction map. Images were reconstructed using an ordered-subset expectation-maximization (OSEM) iterative reconstruction algorithm. The CT acquisition parameters were as follows: 140 kV, 120 mAs, and slice thickness 5 mm. Semi-quantitative analysis of the data was performed. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) for each suspicious lesion was measured. Either lymph node uptake or widespread peritoneal uptake greater than that in the liver or surrounding tissue was considered to be suspicious of metastatic/peritoneal dissemination. For the measurement of FDG uptake, regions of interest (ROIs) were manually placed on the main lesion and suspected metastasis. Images were evaluated by two nuclear medicine physicians who were informed about the clinical data of the patient at the time of the scan.

Statistical analysis

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine a cut-off value for SUVmax of peritoneal disease to predict ovarian cancer recurrence. The area under the curve was calculated with ROC analysis. The PFS was defined as the time from the PET/CT scan to the appearance of clinical or radiological progression. The differences in PFS were assessed by Kaplan–Meier curves. Multivariate analyses using the Cox proportional hazards regression model were performed to assess the potential independent effects of multiple factors on PFS (age, stage, pathological type, CA125 levels, lymph node involvement, peritoneal dissemination, and extra-abdominal disease). Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed. All analyses were performed with commercial software (IBM SPSS Statistics version 21, IBM Corp., Somers, NY). A P < .05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.

Results

A total of 145 patients were retrospectively reviewed in this study. Twenty-nine patients were excluded as their follow-up results were not available. One hundred sixteen patients were included in the final analysis. Basic data of the final 116 patients are listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Patient characteristics for recurrent ovarian cancer.

Patient characteristics for recurrent ovarian cancer.

The prognostic value of SUVmax of peritoneal disease

82/116 (71%) patients were found with peritoneal carcinomatosis on 18F-FDG PET/CT. The SUVmax of the peritoneal carcinomatosis ranged from 0.9 to 19.9. With a SUVmax cut-off value of 2.0 obtained from the ROC curve analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of SUVmax of peritoneal disease for predicting ovarian cancer recurrence were 77.6%, 87.5%, 65.1%, 97.4%, and 38.9%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.85. Readers’ ROC curves are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

ROC curve analysis for determination of the cut-off value of SUVmax of peritoneal disease for predicting recurrence. The area under the curve is 0.85.

ROC curve analysis for determination of the cut-off value of SUVmax of peritoneal disease for predicting recurrence. The area under the curve is 0.85.

Correlation of the extent of peritoneal disease with PFS

Of the 116 patients enrolled, 82 patients were found with peritoneal disease and 34 patients without the peritoneal disease. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve performed between these 2 groups showed patients without peritoneal disease had a significantly longer PFS (Fig. 2). Eighty-two patients with peritoneal disease were further classified into 2 groups by the degree of peritoneal involvement: 62 patients with localized disease, 20 patients with diffuse disease. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve among these 3 groups (patients without peritoneal disease, patients with localized peritoneal disease and those with diffuse peritoneal disease) was performed and showed a significant difference in PFS (Fig. 3). Of the 82 patients with peritoneal disease, 18F-FDG PET/CT also showed extra-abdominal involvement in 24 patients. But There was no difference in survival between patients with disease confined to the peritoneum and those who also had extraperitoneal metastases (P = .764).
Figure 2

PFS among patients with or without peritoneal involvement. The green line represents the patients with peritoneal involvement, and the blue line represents patients without peritoneal involvement. The Kaplan-Meier survival plot shows a significant difference in PFS between these 2 groups: (P = .026; HR, 1.06).

Figure 3

PFS among patients with ovarian cancer stratified by the degree of peritoneal involvement. Kaplan-Meier survival plot shows a significant difference in PFS among the groups: The blue line represents patients without the peritoneal disease. The green line represents the localized peritoneal involvement. The yellow line represents the diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis. (P < .05; HR, 1.354).

PFS among patients with or without peritoneal involvement. The green line represents the patients with peritoneal involvement, and the blue line represents patients without peritoneal involvement. The Kaplan-Meier survival plot shows a significant difference in PFS between these 2 groups: (P = .026; HR, 1.06). PFS among patients with ovarian cancer stratified by the degree of peritoneal involvement. Kaplan-Meier survival plot shows a significant difference in PFS among the groups: The blue line represents patients without the peritoneal disease. The green line represents the localized peritoneal involvement. The yellow line represents the diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis. (P < .05; HR, 1.354).

Multivariate analysis

The Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate the prognostic value of parameters including age, stage, pathological type, CA125 levels, lymph node involvement, peritoneal dissemination, and extra-abdominal disease. In a multivariate analysis, only the SUVmax of peritoneal carcinomatosis (P = .026, HR 1.06,95% CI, 1.007–1.116), peritoneal dissemination (P < .05; HR, 1.354; 95% CI, 1.001–1.832) and CA125 levels (P = .04; HR, 1.001; 95% CI, 1.000–1.002) were found to be significant independent prognostic variables.

Discussion

Imaging modalities visualizing metabolic pathways provide an opportunity to monitor the metabolism of tumors in vivo and evaluate the response to therapy.[18F-FDG PET/ CT has been investigated in patients with ovarian cancer, displaying high diagnostic accuracy of post-treatment recurrence that results in a change of patient management, especially in subjects with elevated CA125 and negative results of other imaging techniques.[ Extensive data have shown that 18F-FDG is valuable in determining prognosis of preoperative ovarian cancer.[ However, there are relatively fewer studies in terms of PET/CT's utility in predicting prognosis of recurrent ovarian cancer. In this study, we assessed the association between the post-treatment values of SUVmax of peritoneal carcinomatosis, the extent of peritoneal involvement, CA125 levels, and the outcomes of ovarian cancer. Ovarian cancer can spread locally within the pelvis with subsequent spread within the peritoneal cavity to the rest of the abdomen. In patients with peritoneal metastases, PET/CT demonstrates high sensitivity and accuracy in detecting lesions compared with CT and MRI.[ SUVmax-based assessment of response has been found to be one of the most common predictors of recurrent disease after primary treatment.[ The presence of abnormal peritoneal FDG uptake has been widely accepted as a criterion for differentiation between benign and malignant disease in ovarian cancer. A high SUVmax has been shown to correlate with tumor proliferation and other signs of aggressive tumor behavior and portends worsened survival in these patients. We found that SUVmax, plus peritoneal dissemination, are important prognostic factors. In a retrospective study testing the prognostic value of the 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters (SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis) at the time of the first relapse of ovarian cancer, Perrone et al found that only SUVmax demonstrated to be significantly associated to survival and represented a prognostic factor.[ Another retrospective study by Sala et al[ also found that higher SUVmax values of peritoneal deposits in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer were significantly associated with poor survival and may have potential as prognostic biomarkers for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. In this study, we found that peritoneal dissemination and extra-abdominal involvement could be used to predict the patients’ PFS. Patients without peritoneal disease had a significantly longer PFS than those with peritoneal disease. And a significant difference in PFS was also found between patients with localized peritoneal disease and those with diffuse peritoneal disease. Our findings are in line with Hebel et al,[ who demonstrated that there was a significantly better survival in FDG-PET/CT negative than in positive patients, and no difference in survival between patients who only had metastases confined to the peritoneum on FDG PET/CT and those who also had extra-abdominal involvement. CA125 is currently the most widely used tumor marker for initial diagnosis and monitoring of response to chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. Several studies have documented that an elevation of serum CA125 can precede the appearance of clinically or radiographically measurable recurrence.[ 56.9% of patients enrolled in this study had elevated CA125 levels, and CA125 level was also found to be an independent predictor of PFS in a multivariate model. However, increased CA125 values cannot provide information about the locations of tumor recurrence or differentiate between localized and diffuse tumor recurrence.[ Furthermore, 20% of ovarian cancers have little or no expression of CA125.[ In our study, 18F-FDG PET/CT showed peritoneal dissemination in 8 patients with normal CA125. Of course, the present study has its limitations due to the retrospective design. The treatment patients received varied highly, and the duration of follow-up and survival was relatively short. In conclusion, the SUVmax of peritoneal disease is valuable in predicting the recurrence of ovarian cancer. SUVmax of peritoneal disease, peritoneal dissemination and CA125 levels could be used as independent prognostic factors for ovarian cancer patients.

Author contributions

Funding acquisition: Wuying Cheng. Investigation: Wei Zhang, Fengyu Wu. Methodology: Zhaohui Zhu. Project administration: Wuying Cheng, Wei Zhang. Writing – original draft: Yuanyuan Jiang, Guozhu Hou. Writing – review & editing: Yuanyuan Jiang, Guozhu Hou.
  21 in total

1.  Preoperative risk stratification using metabolic parameters of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in patients with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yuko Suenaga; Yoshiko Ueno; Tetsuo Maeda; Yasuhiko Ebina; Hideto Yamada; Takashi Okunaga; Kazuhiro Kubo; Keitarou Sofue; Tomonori Kanda; Yukihisa Tamaki; Kazuro Sugimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Value of (18F)-FDG positron emission tomography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing primary and recurrent ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  R A Kubik-Huch; W Dörffler; G K von Schulthess; B Marincek; O R Köchli; B Seifert; U Haller; H C Steinert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Maximum standardized uptake value of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography is a prognostic factor in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Haruhisa Konishi; Kazuhiro Takehara; Atsumi Kojima; Shinichi Okame; Yasuko Yamamoto; Yuko Shiroyama; Takashi Yokoyama; Takayoshi Nogawa; Yoshifumi Sugawara
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Recurrence patterns of advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers after complete cytoreduction during interval debulking surgery.

Authors:  Tomoka Usami; Kazuyoshi Kato; Tomoko Taniguchi; Akiko Abe; Hidetaka Nomura; Akiko Yamamoto; Maki Matoda; Sanshiro Okamoto; Eiji Kondo; Kohei Omatsu; Yasutaka Kawamata; Nobuhiro Takeshima
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  A model for predicting surgical outcome in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma using computed tomography.

Authors:  R E Bristow; L R Duska; N C Lambrou; E K Fishman; M J O'Neill; E L Trimble; F J Montz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Standardized FDG uptake as a prognostic variable and as a predictor of incomplete cytoreduction in primary advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Signe Risum; Annika Loft; Claus Høgdall; Anne K Berthelsen; Estrid Høgdall; Lene Lundvall; Lotte Nedergaard; Svend A Engelholm
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.089

Review 7.  The role of CT in the evaluation of ovarian malignancy.

Authors:  M A Amendola
Journal:  Crit Rev Diagn Imaging       Date:  1985

Review 8.  [Positron emission tomography (PET) in malignant ovarian tumors].

Authors:  Maciej Fularz; Paulina Adamiak; Rafał Czepczyński; Grazyna Jarzabek-Bielecka; Witold Kedzia; Marek Ruchała
Journal:  Ginekol Pol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Evaluation of the cost of CA-125 measurement, physical exam, and imaging in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Amy Armstrong; Balint Otvos; Sareena Singh; Robert Debernardo
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Potential Prognostic Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Relapse. A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Anna Myriam Perrone; Giulia Dondi; Giacomo Maria Lima; Paolo Castellucci; Marco Tesei; Sara Coluccelli; Giuseppe Gasparre; Anna Maria Porcelli; Cristina Nanni; Stefano Fanti; Pierandrea De Iaco
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.