Literature DB >> 24060416

Evaluation of the cost of CA-125 measurement, physical exam, and imaging in the diagnosis of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Amy Armstrong1, Balint Otvos, Sareena Singh, Robert Debernardo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ovarian cancer accounts for 50% of deaths from gynecologic malignancies. We sought to determine the cost of common methods of surveillance of women with ovarian cancer in first clinical remission. The current standard for post treatment surveillance is the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.
METHODS: We retrospectively determined how recurrence was initially detected at our institution and a cost model was created and applied to the United States population to calculate surveillance costs using the Surveillance Epidemiology & End Results (SEER) database.
RESULTS: 57% (n=60) of first recurrences were identified by increasing CA 125 level. Routine office visit identified 27% (n=29) of recurrences, and 15% (n=16) were diagnosed initially with CT scan. In 5% (5/105), CT abnormality was the only finding. 95% (100/105) of patients had either elevated CA 125 or office visit findings at time of recurrence. Of the 22,000 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer yearly, 60% (n=13,266) will have advanced disease and are likely to recur. The surveillance cost for this population for 2 years using our model is $32,500,000 using NCCN guidelines and $58,000,000 if one CT scan is obtained.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that following NCCN guidelines will detect 95% of recurrences. An additional $26 million will be needed to identify the 5% of women with recurrence seen on CT only. Post treatment surveillance of ovarian cancer patients contributes significantly to health care costs. Use of CT scan to follow these patients largely increases cost with only a small increase in recurrence detection.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost; Ovarian cancer; Surveillance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24060416     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.09.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  7 in total

1.  Serum Tumor Marker Use in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Melissa K Accordino; Jason D Wright; Sowmya Vasan; Alfred I Neugut; Ana Tergas; Jim C Hu; Dawn L Hershman; Melissa K Accordino; Jason D Wright; Sowmya Vasan; Alfred I Neugut; Ana Tergas; Jim C Hu; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  VAV3 Overexpressed in Cancer Stem Cells Is a Poor Prognostic Indicator in Ovarian Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Ah-Young Kwon; Gwang-Il Kim; Ju-Yeon Jeong; Ji-Ye Song; Kyu-Beom Kwack; Chan Lee; Hae-Youn Kang; Tae-Heon Kim; Jin-Hyung Heo; Hee Jung An
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  Assessment of Circulating Tumor Cells as a Predictive Biomarker of Histology in Women With Suspected Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Emil Lou; Rachel I Vogel; Deanna Teoh; Spencer Hoostal; Aaron Grad; Matthew Gerber; Minnu Monu; Tomasz Lukaszewski; Jaai Deshpande; Michael A Linden; Melissa A Geller
Journal:  Lab Med       Date:  2018-03-21

4.  The Combination of CA125 and NSE Is Useful for Predicting Liver Metastasis of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Chu-Feng Wang; Sheng-Jia Peng; Rong-Qiang Liu; Ya-Jie Yu; Qian-Min Ge; Rong-Bin Liang; Qiu-Yu Li; Biao Li; Yi Shao
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 5.  Improving the quality of care for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: Program components, implementation barriers, and recommendations.

Authors:  Sarah M Temkin; Matthew P Smeltzer; Monique D Dawkins; Leigh M Boehmer; Leigha Senter; Destin R Black; Stephanie V Blank; Anna Yemelyanova; Anthony M Magliocco; Mollie A Finkel; Tracy E Moore; Premal H Thaker
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 6.921

6.  Use of CA-125 Tests and Computed Tomographic Scans for Surveillance in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Katharine M Esselen; Angel M Cronin; Kristin Bixel; Michael A Bookman; Robert A Burger; David E Cohn; Mihaela Cristea; Jennifer J Griggs; Charles F Levenback; Gina Mantia-Smaldone; Larissa A Meyer; Ursula A Matulonis; Joyce C Niland; Charlotte Sun; David M O'Malley; Alexi A Wright
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  The maximum standardized uptake value and extent of peritoneal involvement may predict the prognosis of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after primary treatment: A retrospective clinical study.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Jiang; Guozhu Hou; Fengyu Wu; Zhaohui Zhu; Wei Zhang; Wuying Cheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.