Literature DB >> 32070249

No genetic contribution to variation in human offspring sex ratio: a total population study of 4.7 million births.

Brendan P Zietsch1, Hasse Walum2,3, Paul Lichtenstein4, Karin J H Verweij5, Ralf Kuja-Halkola4.   

Abstract

The ratio of males to females among an individual's offspring at birth (offspring sex ratio) has long been of great interest to evolutionary biologists. The human offspring sex ratio is around 1 : 1 and is understood primarily in terms of Fisher's principle (R. A. Fisher, The genetical theory of natural selection, 1930), which is based on the insight that in a population with an unequal sex ratio, each individual of the rarer sex will on average have greater reproductive value than each individual of the more common sex. Accordingly, individuals genetically predisposed to produce the rarer sex will tend to have greater fitness and thus genes predisposing to bearing that sex will increase in frequency until the population sex ratio approaches 1 : 1. An assumption of this perspective is that individuals' offspring sex ratio is heritable. However, the heritability in humans remains remarkably uncertain, with inconsistent findings and important power limitations of existing studies. To address this persistent uncertainty, we used data from the entire Swedish-born population born 1932 or later, including 3 543 243 individuals and their 4 753 269 children. To investigate whether offspring sex ratio is influenced by genetic variation, we tested the association between individuals' offspring's sex and their siblings' offspring's sex (n pairs = 14 015 421). We estimated that the heritability for offspring sex ratio was zero, with an upper 95% confidence interval of 0.002, rendering Fisher's principle and several other existing hypotheses untenable as frameworks for understanding human offspring sex ratio.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Trivers–Willard; familial aggregation; negative frequency-dependent selection; sex allocation; steroid hormones

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32070249      PMCID: PMC7062014          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.2849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  35 in total

1.  Paternal HLA genotype and offspring sex ratio.

Authors:  P Astolfi; M Cuccia; M Martinetti
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 0.553

Review 2.  Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the "animal model".

Authors:  Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The Swedish Multi-generation Register.

Authors:  Anders Ekbom
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

4.  Action of genes affecting secondary sex ratio in man.

Authors:  M E BERNSTEIN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1951-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Technical note: an R package for fitting generalized linear mixed models in animal breeding.

Authors:  A I Vazquez; D M Bates; G J M Rosa; D Gianola; K A Weigel
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 6.  Offspring sex ratio in mammals and the Trivers-Willard hypothesis: In pursuit of unambiguous evidence.

Authors:  Mathieu Douhard
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 4.345

7.  Socioeconomic status and sex ratios at birth in Sweden: No evidence for a Trivers-Willard effect for a wide range of status indicators.

Authors:  Martin Kolk; Sebastian Schnettler
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 1.937

8.  Revisiting a sample of U.S. billionaires: how sample selection and timing of maternal condition influence findings on the Trivers-Willard effect.

Authors:  Sebastian Schnettler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Familial risk and heritability of diagnosed borderline personality disorder: a register study of the Swedish population.

Authors:  Charlotte Skoglund; Annika Tiger; Christian Rück; Predrag Petrovic; Philip Asherson; Clara Hellner; David Mataix-Cols; Ralf Kuja-Halkola
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 15.992

10.  The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research.

Authors:  Jonas F Ludvigsson; Petra Otterblad-Olausson; Birgitta U Pettersson; Anders Ekbom
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 8.082

View more
  7 in total

1.  The Coupon Collection Behavior in Human Reproduction.

Authors:  Erping Long; Jianzhi Zhang
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Does the lack of heritability of human sex ratios require a rethink of sex ratio theory? No: a Comment on Zietsch et al. 2020.

Authors:  Steven Hecht Orzack; Ian C W Hardy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  When theory cannot explain data, the theory needs rethinking. Invited replies to: Orzack SH, Hardy ICW. 2021, and Lehtonen J. 2021.

Authors:  Brendan P Zietsch; Hasse Walum; Paul Lichtenstein; Karin J H Verweij; Ralf Kuja-Halkola
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Fisher's principle remains a plausible explanation for human sex ratio evolution. A Comment on: Zietsch et al. 2020.

Authors:  Jussi Lehtonen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A test of oscillation in the human secondary sex ratio.

Authors:  Ralph Catalano; Joan A Casey; Tim A Bruckner
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2020-04-21

6.  Observable variations in human sex ratio at birth.

Authors:  Yanan Long; Qi Chen; Henrik Larsson; Andrey Rzhetsky
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Are human natal sex ratio differences across the world adaptive? A test of Fisher's principle.

Authors:  Mathieu Douhard; Stéphane Dray
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.703

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.