Literature DB >> 26087675

Socioeconomic status and sex ratios at birth in Sweden: No evidence for a Trivers-Willard effect for a wide range of status indicators.

Martin Kolk1, Sebastian Schnettler2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examines if there exists a positive association between socioeconomic status and the proportion of male births in humans, as proposed by Trivers and Willard in 1973, using individual-level data drawn from the complete population of Sweden.
METHODS: We examine more than 3,000,000 births between 1960 and 2007 using administrative register data with comprehensive information on various dimensions of socioeconomic status. We use six different operationalizations of socioeconomic status, including earnings, post-transfer income (including government allowances), wealth, parental wealth, educational level, and occupational class. We apply regression models that compare both changes in status for the same woman over time and differences in status across different women. We also measure socioeconomic status both at the year of child birth and the year of conception.
RESULTS: Our results show the absence of any relationship between socioeconomic status and sex ratios, using a large number of different operationalizations of status.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that no substantive relationship between socioeconomic status and sex ratios exists for the population and period of our study.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26087675     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  10 in total

1.  No genetic contribution to variation in human offspring sex ratio: a total population study of 4.7 million births.

Authors:  Brendan P Zietsch; Hasse Walum; Paul Lichtenstein; Karin J H Verweij; Ralf Kuja-Halkola
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Preconception stress and the secondary sex ratio in a population-based preconception cohort.

Authors:  Jisuk Bae; Courtney D Lynch; Sungduk Kim; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Katherine J Sapra; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Maternal and paternal serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and the secondary sex ratio: A population-based preconception cohort study.

Authors:  Jisuk Bae; Sungduk Kim; Dana Boyd Barr; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Couples' urinary concentrations of benzophenone-type ultraviolet filters and the secondary sex ratio.

Authors:  Jisuk Bae; Sungduk Kim; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Changes in Income at Macro Level Predict Sex Ratio at Birth in OECD Countries.

Authors:  Ohto Kanninen; Aleksi Karhula
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Kin and birth order effects on male child mortality: three East Asian populations, 1716-1945.

Authors:  Hao Dong; Matteo Manfredini; Satomi Kurosu; Wenshan Yang; James Z Lee
Journal:  Evol Hum Behav       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.178

7.  Effects of Socio-demographic Factors on the Decreasing Trend in the Sex Ratio at Birth in Korea, 1997-2017.

Authors:  Jisuk Bae
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2020-08-07

8.  A preliminary analysis of the secondary sex ratio decline after the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.

Authors:  Yosuke Inoue; Tetsuya Mizoue
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  Girls start life on an uneven playing field: Evidence from lowland rural Nepal.

Authors:  Akanksha A Marphatia; Naomi S Saville; Dharma S Manandhar; Mario Cortina-Borja; Alice M Reid; Jonathan C K Wells
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2022-08-04

10.  Socioeconomic status influences sex ratios in a Chinese rural population.

Authors:  Liqun Luo; Rui Ding; Xiali Gao; Jingjing Sun; Wei Zhao
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.984

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.