Literature DB >> 32763175

The Coupon Collection Behavior in Human Reproduction.

Erping Long1, Jianzhi Zhang2.   

Abstract

There is evidence in humans for genetic influences on the probability (Pboy) that a birth yields a boy instead of a girl [1-6], suggesting a potential variation of Pboy among families. To quantify this variation, we analyze the survey data from over 300,000 UK Biobank participants primarily born between 1940 and 1970 [7]. Surprisingly, the proportion of male children in a family, or sex ratio (SR), has a significantly smaller among-family variation than expected under a uniform Pboy. We propose that this phenomenon results from reproductive behaviors reflecting a preference for having children of both sexes, much like the coupon collector's problem in probability theory where collecting a complete set of distinct coupons is considered a win. We find that the observed deficit in SR variation is explainable by 3.3% of "coupon-collecting" families. Consistently, significantly more families than expected have all children of the same sex except for the child born last. This trend is more pronounced in the late than the early half of the families in the data, suggesting an increasing popularity of this behavior. Analysis of a Dutch genealogical dataset spanning the past 4 centuries reveals higher-than-expected SR variations over much of the history; only after 1940 did the SR variation drop below the expectation. We conclude that a significant fraction of couples now exhibit the coupon collection behavior in reproduction such that SR is more homogeneous among families than expected by chance.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32763175      PMCID: PMC7541714          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  15 in total

1.  Fertility rates in Denmark in relation to the sexes of preceding children in the family.

Authors:  R Jacobsen; H Møller; G Engholm
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Same-sex families.

Authors:  R J MYERS
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1949-10       Impact factor: 2.645

3.  Preferences for the sex-composition of children in Europe: a multilevel examination of its effect on progression to a third child.

Authors:  Melinda Mills; Katia Begall
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2010-03

4.  A two-generation study of human sex-ratio variation.

Authors:  J W Curtsinger; R Ito; Y Hiraizumi
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Parental gender preferences and reproductive behaviour: a review of the recent literature.

Authors:  Karsten Hank
Journal:  J Biosoc Sci       Date:  2006-12-11

6.  Impact of BRCA mutations on female fertility and offspring sex ratio.

Authors:  Roxana Moslehi; Ranjana Singh; Lawrence Lessner; Jan M Friedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2010 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.937

7.  Genome-wide association study reveals sex-specific selection signals against autosomal nucleotide variants.

Authors:  Dongchan Ryu; Jihye Ryu; Chaeyoung Lee
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Son Preference in Pakistan; A Myth or Reality.

Authors:  Khaula Atif; Muhammad Zia Ullah; Afeera Afsheen; Syed Abid Hassan Naqvi; Zulqarnain Ashraf Raja; Saleem Asif Niazi
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

9.  Sex composition and its impact on future childbearing: a longitudinal study from urban Uttar Pradesh.

Authors:  Sowmya Rajan; Priya Nanda; Lisa M Calhoun; Ilene S Speizer
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.223

10.  The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data.

Authors:  Clare Bycroft; Colin Freeman; Desislava Petkova; Gavin Band; Lloyd T Elliott; Kevin Sharp; Allan Motyer; Damjan Vukcevic; Olivier Delaneau; Jared O'Connell; Adrian Cortes; Samantha Welsh; Alan Young; Mark Effingham; Gil McVean; Stephen Leslie; Naomi Allen; Peter Donnelly; Jonathan Marchini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.