Jeremy A Elman1, Matthew S Panizzon2, Daniel E Gustavson3, Carol E Franz2, Mark E Sanderson-Cimino2, Michael J Lyons4, William S Kremen5. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, California; Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California, San Diego, California. Electronic address: jaelman@ucsd.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, California; Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California, San Diego, California. 3. Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California, San Diego, California; Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 4. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, California; Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California, San Diego, California; Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stage 1 of the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association's proposed Alzheimer's disease continuum is defined as amyloid-β (Aβ) positive but cognitively normal. Identifying at-risk individuals before Aβ reaches pathological levels could have great benefits for early intervention. Although Aβ levels become abnormal long before severe cognitive impairments appear, increasing evidence suggests that subtle cognitive changes may begin early, potentially before Aβ surpasses the threshold for abnormality. We examined whether baseline cognitive performance would predict progression from normal to abnormal levels of Aβ. METHODS: We examined the association of baseline cognitive composites (Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) memory factor composite) with progression to Aβ positivity in 292 nondemented, Aβ-negative ADNI participants. Additional analyses included continuous cerebrospinal fluid biomarker levels to examine the effects of subthreshold pathology. RESULTS: Forty participants progressed to Aβ positivity during follow-up. Poorer baseline performance on both cognitive measures was significantly associated with increased odds of progression. More abnormal levels of baseline cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau and subthreshold Aβ were associated with increased odds of progression to Aβ positivity. Nevertheless, baseline ADNI memory factor composite performance predicted progression even after controlling for baseline biomarker levels and APOE genotype (Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite was trend level). Survival analyses were largely consistent: controlling for baseline biomarker levels, baseline Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite still significantly predicted progression time to Aβ positivity (ADNI memory factor composite was trend level). CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of intervening before Aβ reaches pathological levels is of obvious benefit. Low-cost, noninvasive cognitive measures can be informative for determining who is likely to progress to Aβ positivity, even after accounting for baseline subthreshold biomarker levels.
BACKGROUND: Stage 1 of the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association's proposed Alzheimer's disease continuum is defined as amyloid-β (Aβ) positive but cognitively normal. Identifying at-risk individuals before Aβ reaches pathological levels could have great benefits for early intervention. Although Aβ levels become abnormal long before severe cognitive impairments appear, increasing evidence suggests that subtle cognitive changes may begin early, potentially before Aβ surpasses the threshold for abnormality. We examined whether baseline cognitive performance would predict progression from normal to abnormal levels of Aβ. METHODS: We examined the association of baseline cognitive composites (Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) memory factor composite) with progression to Aβ positivity in 292 nondemented, Aβ-negative ADNIparticipants. Additional analyses included continuous cerebrospinal fluid biomarker levels to examine the effects of subthreshold pathology. RESULTS: Forty participants progressed to Aβ positivity during follow-up. Poorer baseline performance on both cognitive measures was significantly associated with increased odds of progression. More abnormal levels of baseline cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau and subthreshold Aβ were associated with increased odds of progression to Aβ positivity. Nevertheless, baseline ADNI memory factor composite performance predicted progression even after controlling for baseline biomarker levels and APOE genotype (Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite was trend level). Survival analyses were largely consistent: controlling for baseline biomarker levels, baseline Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite still significantly predicted progression time to Aβ positivity (ADNI memory factor composite was trend level). CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of intervening before Aβ reaches pathological levels is of obvious benefit. Low-cost, noninvasive cognitive measures can be informative for determining who is likely to progress to Aβ positivity, even after accounting for baseline subthreshold biomarker levels.
Authors: Laura E Gibbons; Adam C Carle; R Scott Mackin; Danielle Harvey; Shubhabrata Mukherjee; Philip Insel; S McKay Curtis; Dan Mungas; Paul K Crane Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Kaj Blennow; Niklas Mattsson; Michael Schöll; Oskar Hansson; Henrik Zetterberg Journal: Trends Pharmacol Sci Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 14.819
Authors: Susan M Landau; Christopher Breault; Abhinay D Joshi; Michael Pontecorvo; Chester A Mathis; William J Jagust; Mark A Mintun Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-11-19 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: D A Bennett; J A Schneider; Z Arvanitakis; J F Kelly; N T Aggarwal; R C Shah; R S Wilson Journal: Neurology Date: 2006-06-27 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michael C Donohue; Reisa A Sperling; Ronald Petersen; Chung-Kai Sun; Michael W Weiner; Paul S Aisen Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Philip S Insel; Niklas Mattsson; Michael C Donohue; R Scott Mackin; Paul S Aisen; Clifford R Jack; Leslie M Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Michael W Weiner Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Michael Schöll; Samuel N Lockhart; Daniel R Schonhaut; James P O'Neil; Mustafa Janabi; Rik Ossenkoppele; Suzanne L Baker; Jacob W Vogel; Jamie Faria; Henry D Schwimmer; Gil D Rabinovici; William J Jagust Journal: Neuron Date: 2016-03-02 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Daniel E Gustavson; Jeremy A Elman; Mark Sanderson-Cimino; Carol E Franz; Matthew S Panizzon; Amy J Jak; Chandra A Reynolds; Michael C Neale; Michael J Lyons; William S Kremen Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2020-04-11
Authors: Michelle E Farrell; Xi Chen; Melissa M Rundle; Micaela Y Chan; Gagan S Wig; Denise C Park Journal: Neurology Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Mark Sanderson-Cimino; Jeremy A Elman; Xin M Tu; Alden L Gross; Matthew S Panizzon; Daniel E Gustavson; Mark W Bondi; Emily C Edmonds; Joel S Eppig; Carol E Franz; Amy J Jak; Michael J Lyons; Kelsey R Thomas; McKenna E Williams; William S Kremen Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2022-04-25 Impact factor: 5.702
Authors: Daniel E Gustavson; Chandra A Reynolds; Timothy J Hohman; Angela L Jefferson; Jeremy A Elman; Matthew S Panizzon; Michael C Neale; Mark W Logue; Michael J Lyons; Carol E Franz; William S Kremen Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2022-02-21 Impact factor: 3.114
Authors: Dallas P Veitch; Michael W Weiner; Paul S Aisen; Laurel A Beckett; Charles DeCarli; Robert C Green; Danielle Harvey; Clifford R Jack; William Jagust; Susan M Landau; John C Morris; Ozioma Okonkwo; Richard J Perrin; Ronald C Petersen; Monica Rivera-Mindt; Andrew J Saykin; Leslie M Shaw; Arthur W Toga; Duygu Tosun; John Q Trojanowski Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 16.655
Authors: Mark Sanderson-Cimino; Jeremy A Elman; Xin M Tu; Alden L Gross; Matthew S Panizzon; Daniel E Gustavson; Mark W Bondi; Emily C Edmonds; Graham M L Eglit; Joel S Eppig; Carol E Franz; Amy J Jak; Michael J Lyons; Kelsey R Thomas; McKenna E Williams; William S Kremen Journal: Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Date: 2022-02-01
Authors: Sarah Holden; Payel Kundu; Eileen R S Torres; Reetesh Sudhakar; Destine Krenik; Dmytro Grygoryev; Mitchel S Turker; Jacob Raber Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Sonja M Kagerer; Clemens Schroeder; Jiri M G van Bergen; Simon J Schreiner; Rafael Meyer; Stefanie C Steininger; Laetitia Vionnet; Anton F Gietl; Valerie Treyer; Alfred Buck; Klaas P Pruessmann; Christoph Hock; Paul G Unschuld Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2022-03-03 Impact factor: 5.750
Authors: Mark Sanderson-Cimino; Jeremy A Elman; Xin M Tu; Alden L Gross; Matthew S Panizzon; Daniel E Gustavson; Mark W Bondi; Emily C Edmonds; Graham M L Eglit; Joel S Eppig; Carol E Franz; Amy J Jak; Michael J Lyons; Kelsey R Thomas; McKenna E Williams; William S Kremen Journal: medRxiv Date: 2020-11-05