Literature DB >> 30899990

[Claims and realities of brace treatment : Primary correction of scoliosis in children and adolescents].

Konstantinos Tsaknakis1, Lena Braunschweig1, Heiko M Lorenz1, Anna K Hell2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is understood that an effective brace therapy requires a primary curve angle reduction of 50% after administering the first orthotic brace.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of conservative brace therapy for scoliosis with a curve angle above 20° and to determine possible influencing factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The current study included a cohort of 110 scoliosis patients with conservative brace therapy. The development of the scoliotic curve during brace therapy was documented for an average of 40 months. Influencing factors such as the initial Risser sign, age at the start of treatment, gender, curve patterns and body mass index were analyzed.
RESULTS: The collective consisted of 88 patients with idiopathic and 22 with neuromuscular spinal deformities. At the beginning of the brace therapy, the average age was 12.2 ± 2.8 years with a mean scoliosis curve angle of 30.4° ± 12.5°. The primary brace reduced the scoliotic curve by 31% to 20.9°. In children and adolescents with lower maturity status, the success of the brace therapy was greater than in patients with a higher Risser sign. In addition, children with obesity had less success during brace therapy than normal- or underweight children.
CONCLUSIONS: The initial curvature correction of 50% required for effective brace therapy could only be achieved in one third of the patients. On average, the correction was 31%.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescents; Body mass index; Body weight; Conservative therapy; Spine

Year:  2020        PMID: 30899990     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-019-03709-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  28 in total

Review 1.  Standardization of criteria for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis brace studies: SRS Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management.

Authors:  B Stephens Richards; Robert M Bernstein; Charles R D'Amato; George H Thompson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  A meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-operative treatments for idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  D E Rowe; S M Bernstein; M F Riddick; F Adler; J B Emans; D Gardner-Bonneau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Prediction of curve progression in idiopathic scoliosis based on initial roentgenograms. A proposal of an equation.

Authors:  Y Yamauchi; T Yamaguchi; Y Asaka
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The objective determination of compliance in treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with spinal orthoses.

Authors:  Andreas Helfenstein; Michael Lankes; Katharina Ohlert; Deike Varoga; Hans-Jürgen Hahne; Hans Wolfram Ulrich; Joachim Hassenpflug
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Compliance monitoring of brace treatment for patients with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Masakazu Takemitsu; J Richard Bowen; Tariq Rahman; Joe J Glutting; Claude B Scott
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Accuracy in the prediction and estimation of adherence to bracewear before and during treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Anne Morton; Russ Riddle; Renee Buchanan; Don Katz; John Birch
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2008 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Estimating the final outcome of brace treatment for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis at 6-month follow-up.

Authors:  Franz Landauer; Cornelius Wimmer; Hannes Behensky
Journal:  Pediatr Rehabil       Date:  2003 Jul-Dec

9.  The classic: The iliac apophysis: an invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis. 1958.

Authors:  Joseph C Risser
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  It's not just the big kids: both high and low BMI impact bracing success for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Christine M Goodbody; Ivor B Asztalos; Wudbhav N Sankar; John M Flynn
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 1.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.