Literature DB >> 24075478

Polycaprolactone scaffold and reduced rhBMP-7 dose for the regeneration of critical-sized defects in sheep tibiae.

Amaia Cipitria1, Johannes C Reichert, Devakar R Epari, Siamak Saifzadeh, Arne Berner, Hanna Schell, Manav Mehta, Michael A Schuetz, Georg N Duda, Dietmar W Hutmacher.   

Abstract

The transplantation of autologous bone graft as a treatment for large bone defects has the limitation of harvesting co-morbidity and limited availability. This drives the orthopaedic research community to develop bone graft substitutes. Routinely, supra-physiological doses of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are applied perpetuating concerns over undesired side effects and cost of BMPs. We therefore aimed to design a composite scaffold that allows maintenance of protein bioactivity and enhances growth factor retention at the implantation site. Critical-sized defects in sheep tibiae were treated with the autograft and with two dosages of rhBMP-7, 3.5 mg and 1.75 mg, embedded in a slowly degradable medical grade poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) scaffold with β-tricalcium phosphate microparticles (mPCL-TCP). Specimens were characterised by biomechanical testing, microcomputed tomography and histology. Bridging was observed within 3 months for the autograft and both rhBMP-7 treatments. No significant difference was observed between the low and high rhBMP-7 dosages or between any of the rhBMP-7 groups and autograft implantation. Scaffolds alone did not induce comparable levels of bone formation compared to the autograft and rhBMP-7 groups. In summary, the mPCL-TCP scaffold with the lower rhBMP-7 dose led to equivalent results to autograft transplantation or the high BMP dosage. Our data suggest a promising clinical future for BMP application in scaffold-based bone tissue engineering, lowering and optimising the amount of required BMP. Crown
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMP (bone morphogenetic protein); Bone tissue engineering; Ovine animal model; Polycaprolactone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24075478     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  27 in total

1.  SHEEP AS AN EXPERIMENTAL MODEL FOR BIOMATERIAL IMPLANT EVALUATION.

Authors:  Suelen Cristina Sartoretto; Marcelo José Uzeda; Fúlvio Borges Miguel; Jhonathan Raphaell Nascimento; Fabio Ascoli; Mônica Diuana Calasans-Maia
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.513

Review 2.  Advances in the Fabrication of Scaffold and 3D Printing of Biomimetic Bone Graft.

Authors:  Bharti Bisht; Ashley Hope; Anubhab Mukherjee; Manash K Paul
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Four-Dimensional Printing Hierarchy Scaffolds with Highly Biocompatible Smart Polymers for Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Shida Miao; Wei Zhu; Nathan J Castro; Jinsong Leng; Lijie Grace Zhang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 4.  The Use of Adipose Tissue-Derived Progenitors in Bone Tissue Engineering - a Review.

Authors:  Indranil Bhattacharya; Chafik Ghayor; Franz E Weber
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 3.747

5.  A preclinical large-animal model for the assessment of critical-size load-bearing bone defect reconstruction.

Authors:  David S Sparks; Siamak Saifzadeh; Flavia Medeiros Savi; Constantin E Dlaska; Arne Berner; Jan Henkel; Johannes C Reichert; Martin Wullschleger; Jiongyu Ren; Amaia Cipitria; Jacqui A McGovern; Roland Steck; Michael Wagels; Maria Ann Woodruff; Michael A Schuetz; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  Clinical translation of a patient-specific scaffold-guided bone regeneration concept in four cases with large long bone defects.

Authors:  Markus Laubach; Sinduja Suresh; Buddhi Herath; Marie-Luise Wille; Heide Delbrück; Hatem Alabdulrahman; Dietmar W Hutmacher; Frank Hildebrand
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.889

7.  A Composite Lactide-Mineral 3D-Printed Scaffold for Bone Repair and Regeneration.

Authors:  Rayan Fairag; Li Li; Jose Luis Ramirez-GarciaLuna; M Scott Taylor; Brian Gaerke; Michael H Weber; Derek H Rosenzweig; Lisbet Haglund
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-07-09

8.  Combination of BMP2 and EZH2 Inhibition to Stimulate Osteogenesis in a 3D Bone Reconstruction Model.

Authors:  Hayman Lui; Rebekah M Samsonraj; Cedryck Vaquette; Janet Denbeigh; Sanjeev Kakar; Simon M Cool; Amel Dudakovic; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.080

Review 9.  Emulating Human Tissues and Organs: A Bioprinting Perspective Toward Personalized Medicine.

Authors:  Ana Clotilde Fonseca; Ferry P W Melchels; Miguel J S Ferreira; Samuel R Moxon; Geoffrey Potjewyd; Tim R Dargaville; Susan J Kimber; Marco Domingos
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Osseodensification enables bone healing chambers with improved low-density bone site primary stability: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Rafael Coutinho Mello-Machado; Suelen Cristina Sartoretto; Jose Mauro Granjeiro; José de Albuquerque Calasans-Maia; Marcelo Jose Pinheiro Guedes de Uzeda; Carlos Fernando de Almeida Barros Mourão; Bruna Ghiraldini; Fabio Jose Barbosa Bezerra; Plinio Mendes Senna; Mônica Diuana Calasans-Maia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.