| Literature DB >> 36098492 |
Jinglai Sun1,2, Qifeng Li1, Shuo Wang1,3, Guangpu Wang1,2, Jing Zhao1,2, Huanming Li2,4, Chong Liu2,5,6, Yifan Shi7, Zhigang Li2,8, Hui Yu1,2,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A stable animal model was needed to study bone non-union caused by insufficient blood supply, the main object of this paper is to develop a medial malleolar fracture model with controllable arterial vascular injuries in rats for revealing the biochemical mechanism of non-union by insufficient blood supply.Entities:
Keywords: Animal model; Ankle; Arterial vascular; Fracture; Rat
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36098492 PMCID: PMC9531110 DOI: 10.1111/os.13455
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop Surg ISSN: 1757-7853 Impact factor: 2.279
Fig. 1Experimental flow chart. A total of 18 rats were equally divided into three groups. The Sham group (n = 6) underwent a sham surgical procedure, while the other two groups underwent modeled procedures, which attempted to simulate medial malleolar fracture, with (the Fracture + Vascular group, n = 6) or without vascular injuries (the Fracture group, n = 6). Besides intraoperative appearance and postoperative recovery, macroscopic and radiographic characteristics of the medial malleolars were recorded and assessed by a semi‐quantitative scoring system at 24 h, 6 weeks, respectively.
Fig. 2Establishment of a rat medial malleolus fracture model. (A) After shaving and sterilization, a 1 cm incision passing through the molding equipment was made. (B) Ankle structure diagram; the white arrow indicates the medial malleolus. (C) Design drawing of the molding instrument. (D) A breach (2 mm in wide) was cut from the inferomedial aspect of the ankle end toward the central medial malleolus. (E) The saphenous artery is shown by a white arrow. (F) A wound has been sewn up after the operation in Fracture + Vascular group.
Fig. 3Micro‐CT images of the medial malleolus of rats in each group. (A and D) are micro‐CT images of a normal medial malleolus. (B) is a micro‐CT image of the rat in the Fracture group after 24 h. (C) is a micro‐CT image of the rat in the Fracture + Vascular group after 24 h. (E) is a micro‐CT image of the rat in the Fracture group after 6 weeks. (F) is a micro‐CT image of the rat in the Fracture + Vascular group after 6 weeks.
Fig. 4Blood perfusion volume of rats in each group. (A) laser doppler flowmetry (LDF) scanning test results. (B) LDF statistical results for each group. n = 6. The data are the mean ± SEM. Compared with the Sham group, *P < 0.05; compared with the Fracture group, # P < 0.05.
Fig. 5Histological examination (HE) results for the fracture site in each group 24 h after fracture. n = 6. The number of osteocytes in the Fracture + Vascular group had significantly decreased relative to those in the Sham group and the Fracture group.
Fig. 6Number of osteoblasts (OBs) at the fracture site. (A) ALP staining results of the fracture site in each group. (B) The results of TRAP staining of the fracture site in each group. (C) Statistical results for the OBs in each group. (D) Statistical results for the OCs in each group. n = 6. The data are the mean ± SEM. Compared with the Sham group, *P < 0.05; Compared with the Fracture group, # P < 0.05.
Fig. 7The number of neovessels at the fracture site. (A) The results of CD31 immunohistochemistry of the fracture site in each group. (B) The results of CD34 immunofluorescence of the fracture site in each group. (C) The number of CD31‐positive cells in each group was statistically analyzed. (D) The statistical results for the CD34‐positive cells in each group. n = 6. The data are the mean ± SEM. Compared with the Sham group, *P < 0.05; Compared with the Fracture group, # P < 0.05.