Literature DB >> 32055464

Long-term sequelae of inflatable penile prosthesis: clinical characteristics of patients who develop distal cylinder tip extrusion.

Jorge L Fuentes1, Yooni A Yi1, Michael T Davenport1, Rachel L Bergeson1, Ellen E Ward1, Allen F Morey1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Impending distal cylinder tip extrusions (DCTE) make up approximately 5-33% of all inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) reoperations. While there have been a few case reports of DCTE in patients with diabetes and trauma, the current literature regarding risk factors for DCTE is limited. In this study, we examined the long-term sequelae among a large cohort of IPP patients to identify clinical risk factors for impending DCTE.
METHODS: A retrospective review was completed of our single surgeon IPP database of 797 IPP placement cases from the years 2007 to 2018. We identified those who had a surgical intervention for a confirmed DCTE. Infected prostheses were excluded. The primary clinical end point of this study was to identify the time to extrusion repair from original penile prosthesis placement. Secondary clinical end points included location of extrusion and presence of corporal fibrosis.
RESULTS: Between the years 2007 to 2018, 26 cases (3%) of impending or complete cylinder extrusions were identified in our IPP database (n=797). The mean age at initial IPP placement was 58 years, compared to a mean of 66 years at the time of extrusion. The mean time from initial placement to extrusion repair surgery was 8.4 years (median 5.5 years). Most patients (15/26, 57.7%) had a history of prior IPP placement, five of whom had two or more prior prostheses. Location among the 26 extrusions varied-12 (46.2%) lateral, 9 (34.6%) distal urethra, 2 (7.7%) glanular, 2 (7.7%) mid-shaft, and 1 (3.8%) coronal sulcus. Concomitant pathologies identified include Peyronie's disease (7, 26.9%), idiopathic corporal fibrosis (7, 26.9%) and sickle cell disease with priapism induced erectile dysfunction (3, 11.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of IPP extrusion appears to be associated with increased time from initial prosthesis placement, prior history of IPP placement, and the presence of corporal fibrosis or deformity. Patients should be counseled to recognize this important long-term sequela of IPP surgery. 2020 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Penile prosthesis; reoperation; risk factors

Year:  2020        PMID: 32055464      PMCID: PMC6995929          DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Androl Urol        ISSN: 2223-4683


  21 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of penile fibrosis.

Authors:  Nestor F Gonzalez-Cadavid
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Deep glansplasty procedure.

Authors:  Timothy J Tausch; James Ryan Flemons; Allen F Morey
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  A population-based analysis of contemporary rates of reoperation for penile prosthesis procedures.

Authors:  Shaun Grewal; Joel Vetter; Steven B Brandes; Seth A Strope
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  AMS three-piece inflatable implants for erectile dysfunction: a long-term multi-institutional study in 200 consecutive patients.

Authors:  F Montorsi; P Rigatti; G Carmignani; C Corbu; B Campo; G Ordesi; G Breda; P Silvestre; B Giammusso; G Morgia; A Graziottin
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Efficacy and patient satisfaction associated with penile prosthesis revision surgery.

Authors:  Bruce R Kava; Yulong Yang; Cynthia T Soloway
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany.

Authors:  Alessandro Natali; Roberto Olianas; Margit Fisch
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Satisfaction with the malleable penile prosthesis among couples from the Middle East--is it different from that reported elsewhere?

Authors:  N Salama
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.896

8.  Isolated pump erosion of an inflatable penile prosthesis through the scrotum in a diabetic patient.

Authors:  Raidh A Talib; Ahmad Shamsodini; Emad A Salem; Onder Canguven; Abdulla Al Ansari
Journal:  Arch Ital Urol Androl       Date:  2013-04-19

Review 9.  Long-term outcomes of penile prostheses for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Landon W Trost; Ross McCaslin; Brian Linder; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.166

10.  Unusual trivial trauma may end with extrusion of a well-functioning penile prosthesis: a case report.

Authors:  Nader Salama; Tomoteru Kishimoto; Hiro-Omi Kanayama; Susumu Kagawa
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2007-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.