Literature DB >> 23668707

Long-term outcomes of penile prostheses for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Landon W Trost1, Ross McCaslin, Brian Linder, Wayne J G Hellstrom.   

Abstract

Since their introduction 60 years ago, penile prostheses have remained the standard therapy for the management of refractory erectile dysfunction, with multiple long-term series reporting outcomes. A PubMed search was performed from 1990 to present, and outcomes of penile prosthetics were reviewed. Studies with <12 months follow-up were excluded. Overall mechanical survival of three-piece prostheses range from 81-94, 68-89 and 57-76% at 5, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Contemporary infection rates following recent device modifications are 1-2% (low risk) to 2-3% (high risk). Patient satisfaction ranges from 75-100% and varies by prosthetic device. Outcomes are further reviewed among specialized populations (revision surgery, Peyronie's disease, priapism, corporal fibrosis and neurologic impairments). Penile prostheses remain a viable surgical treatment option with excellent mechanical reliability, low infection rates and significant patient/partner satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23668707     DOI: 10.1586/erd.12.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices        ISSN: 1743-4440            Impact factor:   3.166


  15 in total

Review 1.  A practical overview of considerations for penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  Landon Trost; Philip Wanzek; George Bailey
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Comparison of infrapubic versus transcrotal approaches for inflatable penile prosthesis placement: a multi-institution report.

Authors:  L W Trost; A G Boonjindasup; W J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 3.  Erectile Dysfunction in Systemic Sclerosis.

Authors:  Veronika K Jaeger; Ulrich A Walker
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 4.  2013-2014 updates in Peyronie's disease management.

Authors:  Benjamin A Sherer; Krishnan Warrior; Laurence A Levine
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Faysal A Yafi; Lawrence Jenkins; Maarten Albersen; Giovanni Corona; Andrea M Isidori; Shari Goldfarb; Mario Maggi; Christian J Nelson; Sharon Parish; Andrea Salonia; Ronny Tan; John P Mulhall; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 52.329

6.  Long-term sequelae of inflatable penile prosthesis: clinical characteristics of patients who develop distal cylinder tip extrusion.

Authors:  Jorge L Fuentes; Yooni A Yi; Michael T Davenport; Rachel L Bergeson; Ellen E Ward; Allen F Morey
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-02

7.  Clinical Outcome: Patient and Partner Satisfaction after Penile Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Cedric Jorissen; Helene De Bruyna; Evert Baten; Koenraad Van Renterghem
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-10-01

8.  Chronic pain associated with penile prostheses may persist despite revision or explantation.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Campbell; Ernest Pang Chan; Andrew Di Pierdominico; Serkan Karakus; Bruce Trock; Gerald B Brock; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Difference of opinion - Inflatable Penile Prosthesis - Opinion: Why I prefer the penoscrotal access.

Authors:  Celso Gromatzky
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

10.  Patient and partner outcome of inflatable and semi-rigid penile prosthesis in a single institution.

Authors:  Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Burak Arslan; Tarik Yonguc; Zafer Kozacıoglu; Tansu Degirmenci; Bulent Gunlusoy; Suleyman Minareci
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.