Literature DB >> 32055193

Relationship between Residual Feed Intake and Production Traits in a Population of F2 Ducks.

Yun-Sheng Zhang1,2, Ya-Xi Xu1,2, Wen-Lei Fan2, Zheng-Kui Zhou2, Zhi-Ying Zhang1, Shui-Sheng Hou2.   

Abstract

Improving feed efficiency is important for decreasing feed cost in poultry production, because feed account for approximately 70% of the total production costs. The selection of feed efficiency may affect other important economic traits. Therefore, the objectives of this present study was to evaluate the relationships of the residual feed intake (RFI) with live body weight, carcass weight, carcass composition, and size of small intestines in a population of F2 Pekin ducks. Nine-hundred and eighty F2 ducks were derived from a cross between 40 Pekin ducks and 10 Mallard ducks. The results showed no significant correlation of RFI with live body weight and eviscerated carcass weight. RFI had negative effects on breast meat weight and gizzard weight. A positive correlation of RFI with abdominal fat weight, skin weight, and jejunum length was detected. Our results indicated that the selection of RFI could improve the feed efficiency of ducks without affecting their carcass compositions. 2019, Japan Poultry Science Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carcass composition; duck; residual feed intake; small intestine

Year:  2019        PMID: 32055193      PMCID: PMC6993884          DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.0180008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Poult Sci        ISSN: 1346-7395            Impact factor:   1.425


Introduction

Feed intake and feed efficiency are economically important traits for ducks. Improvement in feed efficiency would reduce the amount of feed required for growth, the production cost, and the amount of nitrogenous waste produced (Zhang and Aggrey, 2003). A commonly used measure is feed conversion ratio (FCR; i.e., feed intake: body weight gain), but current genetic selection programs for reducing feed costs in farm animals are focused on residual feed intake (RFI), because selection on FCR can lead to unfavorable changes in the component traits (Crews, 2005). RFI is defined as the difference between the actual feed intake and the expected feed requirements for maintenance and gain of body weight (Koch ). Previous studies have shown that RFI is moderately heritable, with values of heritability ranging from 0.14 to 0.49 (Pakdel ; Aggrey ; Begli ; Zhang ). In contrast to FCR, RFI is independent of growth and maturity patterns. Therefore, RFI should be a more sensitive and precise measurement of feed utilization (Robinson and Oddy, 2004), and presently, an increasing number of farms have been choosing RFI instead of FCR for reducing animal feed costs. Genetic selection for reducing RFI will decrease feed intake and improve feed efficiency without affecting growth performance negatively (Herd ; Mrode and Kennedy, 2010). In poultry, growth traits have made a great progress through genetic selection; a 50–60% increase in growth rate has been attributed to genetic selection (Robins and Phillips, 2011; Drouilhet ). Phenotypic and genetic selection for feed efficiency could have significant effects on carcass compositions. However, there is lack of information describing the effect of selection for altering RFI on carcass compositions traits of ducks, and its effects on carcass traits need to be better understood. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to investigate the relationship of RFI with carcass composition and small intestinal length in an F2 duck population.

Materials and Methods

Population and Animal Husbandry

The present study was conducted at the Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing, China. The care and use of all the ducks used in this experiment were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Animal Sciences of the CAAS. The F1 resource population of ducks came from a cross between 40 female Pekin ducks and 10 male Mallard ducks. Pekin duck is a famous breed, with characteristics of fast growth and excellent fattening. The Mallard duck is a native duck with slow growth and high immune capacities that are distributed in the southeastern part of China. The F1 birds were generated by using either breed as male and female parents. A total of 980 F2 ducks were finally used in this experiment. The ducks were fed on the floor for the first two weeks. Thereafter, all the ducks were transferred to individual cages until they were sacrificed. For the first three days after hatching, the ducklings were exposed to continuous lighting (24 L:0 D); subsequently, a 20 L:4D light regimen was used until the ducks were sacrificed for analysis. Ingredient composition and chemical composition of feedstuff used in this study is presented in Table 1. The ducks were not vaccinated against any disease. Feed and water were provided ad libitum. Feed intake and body weight of each individual were measured every week from 15 days to 70 days, and the carcass traits were assessed after all the ducks were slaughtered at 70 days of age.
Table 1.

Ingredients and chemical composition of feedstuff from hatching until 14 d and diets from 15 to 70 d (% as fed)

IngredientDiets (0 to 14 d)Diets (15 to 70 d)
Corn58.2359.22
Wheat bran11.94
Soybean meal36.1725.32
Soybean oil2.03
Limestone1.201.20
Dicalcium phosphate1.401.40
Sodium chloride0.300.30
DL-Methionine0.170.12
Vitamin and trace mineral premix0.50[1]0.50[2]
Total100.00100.00
Calculated composition
Metabolizable energy, c kcal/kg2,9002,700
Crude protein2118
Methionine0.500.40
Cystine0.360.32
Lysine1.100.90
Calcium0.880.86
Nonphytate phosphorus0.390.38

The following were supplied per kilogram of total diet: Cu (CuSO4·5H2O), 10 mg; Fe (FeSO4·7H2O), 60 mg; Zn (ZnO), 60 mg; Mn (MnSO4·H2O), 80 mg; Se (NaSeO3), 0.3 mg; I (KI), 0.2 mg; Cr (Cr2O3), 0.15 mg; choline chloride, 1,000 mg; vitamin A (retinyl acetate), 10,000 IU; vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), 3,000 IU; vitamin E (dl-α-tocopheryl acetate), 20 IU; vitamin K3 (menadione sodium bisulfate), 2 mg; thiamin (thiamin mononitrate), 2 mg; riboflavin, 8 mg; pyridoxine hydrochloride, 4 mg; cobalamin, 0.02 mg; calcium-d-pantothenate, 20 mg; nicotinic acid, 50 mg; folic acid, 1 mg; biotin, 0.2 mg.

The following were supplied per kilogram of total diet: Cu (CuSO4·5H2O), 10 mg; Fe (FeSO4·7H2O), 60 mg; Zn (ZnO), 60 mg; Mn (MnSO4·H2O), 80 mg; Se (NaSeO3), 0.3 mg; I (KI), 0.2 mg; Cr (Cr2O3), 0.15 mg; choline chloride, 750 mg; vitamin A (retinyl acetate), 8,000 IU; vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), 3,000 IU; vitamin E (dl-α-tocopheryl acetate), 20 IU; vitamin K3 (menadione sodium bisulfate), 2 mg; thiamin (thiamin mononitrate), 1.5 mg; riboflavin, 8 mg; pyridoxine hydrochloride, 3 mg; cobalamin, 0.02 mg; calcium-d-pantothenate, 10 mg; nicotinic acid, 50 mg; folic acid, 1 mg; biotin, 0.2 mg.

The values are calculated according to the metabolizable energy of chickens (Ministry of Agriculture of China, 2004).

The following were supplied per kilogram of total diet: Cu (CuSO4·5H2O), 10 mg; Fe (FeSO4·7H2O), 60 mg; Zn (ZnO), 60 mg; Mn (MnSO4·H2O), 80 mg; Se (NaSeO3), 0.3 mg; I (KI), 0.2 mg; Cr (Cr2O3), 0.15 mg; choline chloride, 1,000 mg; vitamin A (retinyl acetate), 10,000 IU; vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), 3,000 IU; vitamin E (dl-α-tocopheryl acetate), 20 IU; vitamin K3 (menadione sodium bisulfate), 2 mg; thiamin (thiamin mononitrate), 2 mg; riboflavin, 8 mg; pyridoxine hydrochloride, 4 mg; cobalamin, 0.02 mg; calcium-d-pantothenate, 20 mg; nicotinic acid, 50 mg; folic acid, 1 mg; biotin, 0.2 mg. The following were supplied per kilogram of total diet: Cu (CuSO4·5H2O), 10 mg; Fe (FeSO4·7H2O), 60 mg; Zn (ZnO), 60 mg; Mn (MnSO4·H2O), 80 mg; Se (NaSeO3), 0.3 mg; I (KI), 0.2 mg; Cr (Cr2O3), 0.15 mg; choline chloride, 750 mg; vitamin A (retinyl acetate), 8,000 IU; vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), 3,000 IU; vitamin E (dl-α-tocopheryl acetate), 20 IU; vitamin K3 (menadione sodium bisulfate), 2 mg; thiamin (thiamin mononitrate), 1.5 mg; riboflavin, 8 mg; pyridoxine hydrochloride, 3 mg; cobalamin, 0.02 mg; calcium-d-pantothenate, 10 mg; nicotinic acid, 50 mg; folic acid, 1 mg; biotin, 0.2 mg. The values are calculated according to the metabolizable energy of chickens (Ministry of Agriculture of China, 2004).

Carcass Composition

At 10 weeks of age, the 980 ducks studied were fasted for 12 h before they were slaughtered. The slaughtered ducks were defeathered, and the carcass weights including body, breast meat, wing, leg meat, and skin were measured and recorded. In addition, the length of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were measured, and gizzard, liver, and abdominal fat were weighed. The length of duodenum, extending from the pylorus to pancreatic loop, jejunum, extending from the pancreatic loop to distal caecum, and ileum, extending from distal caecum to the ileocaecal junction were measured.

Statistical Analyses

RFI values were obtained using the PROC REG procedure in SAS software package (SAS System, version 9.2; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). The Pearson product–moment correlation procedure in SAS was used to analyze the relationship of RFI with live body weight, carcass compositions, and small intestinal traits. RFI was calculated according to Zhang . RFI=FI−(a+b700.75+b), where, FI is the feed intake, BW700.75 is the 70 d old metabolic weight, BWG is the weight gain from 3 weeks to 10 weeks of age, a is the intercept, and b and b are partial regression coefficients of FI on BW700.75 and BWG, respectively.

Results

Table 2 shows the effect of sex and the regression of RFI on live body weight and carcass traits. The female ducks had significantly lower body weight, eviscerated carcass weight, breast meat weight, skin weight, wing weight, and leg meat weight than the male ducks had. RFI was not significantly correlated with live body weight, eviscerated carcass weight, leg meat weight, and wing weight. RFI had a significant positive correlation with skin weight and a significant negative correlation (P<0.05) with breast meat weight, indicating that skin weight increases and breast meat weight decreases when RFI increases.
Table 2.

Mean values of live body weight and carcass traits, and their correlation coefficients with residual feed intake

ItemNumberFI (g)RFIBW (g)ECW (g)BM (g)Skin (g)Wing (g)Leg (g)
Male49548921.151978±251.36[a]1592±162.38[a]177.01±31.88[a]388.00±86.35[a]151.14±18.70[a]186.89±28.40[a]
Female4854872−0.021804±242.97[b]1463±148.56[b]166.78±30.05[b]363.47±92.02[b]138.62±17.36[b]170.76±25.00[b]
P-value0.5760.6730.2340.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
RFI[A]0.4940.0040.046−0.2980.449−0.045−0.008
P-value0.0000.9220.3030.0130.0000.4140.877

Means within a column for each factor with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05).

Correlation coefficients.

FI: feed intake; BW: body weight; ECW: eviscerated carcass weight; BM: breast meat.

Means within a column for each factor with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). Correlation coefficients. FI: feed intake; BW: body weight; ECW: eviscerated carcass weight; BM: breast meat. The effect of sex and RFI on carcass composition traits are presented in Table 3. The gizzard weight, liver weight, and heart weight were significantly higher in the males than the females (P<0.05). Abdominal fat weight and spleen weight showed no significant differences between male and female ducks. RFI had significant negative effects on gizzard weight, whereas it had a significant positive effect on abdominal fat weights (P<0.05). These results suggest that high feed conversion efficient ducks had larger gizzards and lesser abdominal fat weight.
Table 3.

Means of carcass composition traits and their correlation coefficients with RFI

ItemNumberLiver (g)Gizzard (g)Heart (g)Abdominal fat (g)Spleen (g)
Male49537.61±7.44[a]55.80±9.57[a]12.03±1.83[a]32.30±11.782.21±0.31
Female48533.71±5.92[b]48.33±8.71[b]11.32±1.72[b]32.75±13.652.15±0.23
P-value0.0000.0000.0000.740.56
RFI[A]0.130−0.2620.1880.4220.001
P-value0.1170.0250.0610.0000.323

Means within a column for each factor with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05).

Correlation coefficients.

Means within a column for each factor with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). Correlation coefficients. The effect of sex and RFI on small intestinal morphometric measurements are shown in Table 4. The jejunum length of the male ducks was significantly longer than that of female ducks (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the length of the duodenum and ileum between male and female ducks. RFI had a significant positive correlation on jejunum length.
Table 4.

Means of small intestinal morphometric traits and their correlation coefficients with RFI

ItemNumberDuodenum length (cm)Jejunum length (cm)Ileum length (cm)
Male49527.08±2.84119.67±13.20[a]14.96±1.50
Female48526.19±2.78115.84±13.24[b]14.24±1.48
P-value0.1580.0240.086
RFI[A]0.0970.1110.052
P-value0.0760.0440.345

Means within a column for each factor with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05).

Correlation coefficients.

Means within a column for each factor with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). Correlation coefficients.

Discussion

In poultry, 90% of the phenotypic changes in the past 50 years were due to selection process on the genetic backgrounds (Havenstein ). RFI is a heritable trait and is closely related to production efficiency. In some studies, heritability for RFI was estimated to vary from 0.44 to 0.83 in growing ducks (Drouilhet ; Zhang ). In order to improve the feed efficiency of poultry, the genetic selection of RFI traits has attracted more and more attention. In the present study, the effects of selection for altering RFI on the carcass and small intestine traits of 980 F2 ducks were analyzed to provide more detailed information on the correlations of RFI with the production traits of ducks, which has been seldom reported.

Body weight and Carcass Characteristics

The results indicated that there were sex-specific differences in almost all the traits studied. The male ducks had significantly higher body weight, carcass weight, breast meat weight, and sebum weight than those of female ducks, which is consistent with the findings on chickens (Faria ). Evidently, selection on RFI would affect the related traits. There was no significant correlation between body weight, eviscerated carcass traits, and RFI. RFI, a term proposed by Koch , refers to the fraction of feed intake that is not explained by the maintenance and production requirements without affecting the performances. Previous studies confirmed that RFI is independent of weight and growth efficiency (Archer ; Basarab ; Aggrey ). Zhang found similar results for body weight between low- and high-RFI groups of ducks. Therefore, selection on RFI can improve animal feed efficiency without affecting their feed intake and growth rates. The results showed that there was a significant difference in gizzard, heart, and liver weights between female and male ducks in the F2 population. There was a significant negative correlation between RFI and gizzard weight, and a positive correlation between RFI and abdominal fat weight. The negative correlations between gizzard weight and RFI showed that ducks with high feed conversion usually had larger gizzards. Larger gizzard may enhance digestive ability and improve intestinal absorption efficiency. Stimulating the development of the gizzard may improve the function of the small intestine through better feed flow regulation (Svihus, 2014). Abdominal fat is considered a waste product and is one of the main compartments for fat deposition in ducks. Therefore, reducing the deposition of abdominal fat is a strategy of reducing the cost of production. Our data showed that female ducks had slightly higher abdominal fat deposits than male ducks had; however, this difference was not significant. Similar results were reported in chickens (Bogosavljevic-Boskovic ). In the present study, there was a significant positive correlation between abdominal fat deposition and RFI, indicating that abdominal fat of the ducks with high feed conversion efficiency and low RFI was significantly lower than those of the ducks with less feed conversion efficiency and high RFI.

Small Intestinal Morphometric Characteristics

The early development and function of the digestive tract affect the growth and subsequent performance of ducks. The present study shows that the effect of sex on the length of jejunum is significant, and that the length of jejunum is positively correlated with RFI. Begli reported that total intestine length was longer in male chickens than in female chickens. Jejunum is the main site for nutrient absorption. Previous studies have shown that protein, fat, and starch are absorbed mainly in the jejunum (Riesenfeld ; Sklan and Hurwitz, 1980), and that water and minerals are mainly absorbed in the ileum (Svihus, 2014). In addition, Jackson and Diamond (1996) reported that increased intestinal length improves nutrient absorption. This study suggested that selection on RFI could affect carcass composition traits, and have positive effects on feed intake and jejunum length of ducks. The ducks with high RFI had higher feed intake and a stronger ability to deposit abdominal fat. The present study indicated that selection for low RFI could be useful for reducing the cost of feeding and improving the efficiency of production, which provides insights into the effects of RFI on production traits of ducks, and provides a theoretical basis for the application of RFI in duck breeding.
  9 in total

1.  Growth, livability, and feed conversion of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets.

Authors:  G B Havenstein; P R Ferket; M A Qureshi
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Genetics of efficient feed utilization and national cattle evaluation: a review.

Authors:  D H Denny Crews
Journal:  Genet Mol Res       Date:  2005-06-30

3.  Genetic parameters of ascites-related traits in broilers: correlations with feed efficiency and carcase traits.

Authors:  A Pakdel; J A M van Arendonk; A L J Vereijken; H Bovenhuis
Journal:  Br Poult Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.095

4.  Protein digestion and absorption in young chicks and turkeys.

Authors:  D Sklan; S Hurwitz
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  METABOLIC AND DIGESTIVE RESPONSES TO ARTIFICIAL SELECTION IN CHICKENS.

Authors:  Sue Jackson; Jared Diamond
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Improving residual feed intake of mule progeny of Muscovy ducks: genetic parameters and responses to selection with emphasis on carcass composition and fatty liver quality.

Authors:  L Drouilhet; B Basso; M-D Bernadet; A Cornuez; L Bodin; I David; H Gilbert; C Marie-Etancelin
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Glucose absorption and starch digestion in the intestine of the chicken.

Authors:  G Riesenfeld; D Sklan; A Bar; U Eisner; S Hurwitz
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Genetic properties of feed efficiency parameters in meat-type chickens.

Authors:  Samuel E Aggrey; Arthur B Karnuah; Bram Sebastian; Nicholas B Anthony
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in a random population of Pekin duck.

Authors:  Yunsheng Zhang; Zhan Bao Guo; Ming Xie; Zhiying Zhang; Shuisheng Hou
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.509

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Genome-Wide Association Study of Feed Efficiency Related Traits in Ducks.

Authors:  Qixin Guo; Lan Huang; Yong Jiang; Zhixiu Wang; Yulin Bi; Guohong Chen; Hao Bai; Guobin Chang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Student Education Management Strategy Based on Artificial Intelligence Information Model under the Support of 5G Wireless Network.

Authors:  Yushu Guan
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.