Literature DB >> 25085390

Improving residual feed intake of mule progeny of Muscovy ducks: genetic parameters and responses to selection with emphasis on carcass composition and fatty liver quality.

L Drouilhet1, B Basso2, M-D Bernadet3, A Cornuez3, L Bodin2, I David2, H Gilbert2, C Marie-Etancelin2.   

Abstract

In France, about 95% of the fatty liver production comes from mule ducks, an infertile hybrid cross between female common ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) and Muscovy drakes (Cairina moschata). As a hybrid, genetic improvement of the performance of mule ducks is achieved by selection of the parental populations. Feed represents two-thirds of the total costs of duck production; thus, the breeders' main concern is to improve the birds' feed efficiency without impairing their capacity to be overfed after the growing period. To obtain insight into this economically important trait, we designed a divergent selection experiment for Muscovy sires on the basis of the residual feed intake (RFI) of their male mule progeny. Residual feed intake represents the fraction of feed intake that cannot be explained by maintenance and production requirements. Data comprised records from generations 0 to 2 with 227 Muscovy sires of 2,016 mule ducks. Growth and fat deposition were measured individually for all mule ducks. Half-sib mule ducks were placed together in 1 small pen, and the feed consumption was recorded for each pen; all half-sibs therefore had the same feed intake estimates. Heritability of RFI was high (0.83 ± 0.42), and after 2 generations of selection, the differences between lines in terms of RFI (contrast of 9.13 g/d, representing 0.76 phenotypic standard deviation; P < 0.0001) and feed conversion ratio (contrast of 0.08, representing 0.28 phenotypic standard deviation; P = 0.0003) were marked. In regard to carcass traits, the low-RFI line (high-efficiency animals) had heavier legs (476 vs. 463 g; P < 0.0001) and magret muscles (268 vs. 262 g; P = 0.001) than the high-RFI line (low-efficiency animals). No differences were observed for either the liver weight or the melting rate between the 2 lines (P > 0.46). Selection on RFI thus improves the feed efficiency of animals without impairing their capacity to produce fatty liver.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Muscovy ducks; genetic parameters; mule duck progeny; residual feed intake

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25085390     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-8064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  4 in total

1.  Impact of selection for residual feed intake on production traits and behavior of mule ducks.

Authors:  L Drouilhet; R Monteville; C Molette; M Lague; A Cornuez; L Canario; E Ricard; H Gilbert
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Genetic assessment of residual feed intake as a feed efficiency trait in the Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei.

Authors:  Ping Dai; Sheng Luan; Xia Lu; Kun Luo; Xianhong Meng; Baoxiang Cao; Jie Kong
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Expression of genes related to lipid transport in meat-type ducks divergent for low or high residual feed intake.

Authors:  Sihua Jin; Yuan Xu; He Zang; Lei Yang; Zhiqiang Lin; Yongsheng Li; Zhaoyu Geng
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 2.509

4.  Relationship between Residual Feed Intake and Production Traits in a Population of F2 Ducks.

Authors:  Yun-Sheng Zhang; Ya-Xi Xu; Wen-Lei Fan; Zheng-Kui Zhou; Zhi-Ying Zhang; Shui-Sheng Hou
Journal:  J Poult Sci       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 1.425

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.