Importance: Approximately 25% of patients with early-stage breast cancer who receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy experience a recurrence within 5 years. Improvements in therapy are greatly needed. Objective: To determine if pembrolizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in early-stage breast cancer is likely to be successful in a 300-patient, confirmatory randomized phase 3 neoadjuvant clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: The I-SPY2 study is an ongoing open-label, multicenter, adaptively randomized phase 2 platform trial for high-risk, stage II/III breast cancer, evaluating multiple investigational arms in parallel. Standard NACT serves as the common control arm; investigational agent(s) are added to this backbone. Patients with ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative breast cancer were eligible for randomization to pembrolizumab between November 2015 and November 2016. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive taxane- and anthracycline-based NACT with or without pembrolizumab, followed by definitive surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary end points were residual cancer burden (RCB) and 3-year event-free and distant recurrence-free survival. Investigational arms graduated when demonstrating an 85% predictive probability of success in a hypothetical confirmatory phase 3 trial. Results: Of the 250 women included in the final analysis, 181 were randomized to the standard NACT control group (median [range] age, 47 [24.77] years). Sixty-nine women (median [range] age, 50 [27-71] years) were randomized to 4 cycles of pembrolizumab in combination with weekly paclitaxel followed by AC; 40 hormone receptor (HR)-positive and 29 triple-negative. Pembrolizumab graduated in all 3 biomarker signatures studied. Final estimated pCR rates, evaluated in March 2017, were 44% vs 17%, 30% vs 13%, and 60% vs 22% for pembrolizumab vs control in the ERBB2-negative, HR-positive/ERBB2-negative, and triple-negative cohorts, respectively. Pembrolizumab shifted the RCB distribution to a lower disease burden for each cohort evaluated. Adverse events included immune-related endocrinopathies, notably thyroid abnormalities (13.0%) and adrenal insufficiency (8.7%). Achieving a pCR appeared predictive of long-term outcome, where patients with pCR following pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy had high event-free survival rates (93% at 3 years with 2.8 years' median follow-up). Conclusions and Relevance: When added to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pembrolizumab more than doubled the estimated pCR rates for both HR-positive/ERBB2-negative and triple-negative breast cancer, indicating that checkpoint blockade in women with early-stage, high-risk, ERBB2-negative breast cancer is highly likely to succeed in a phase 3 trial. Pembrolizumab was the first of 10 agents to graduate in the HR-positive/ERBB2-negative signature. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01042379.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Approximately 25% of patients with early-stage breast cancer who receive (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy experience a recurrence within 5 years. Improvements in therapy are greatly needed. Objective: To determine if pembrolizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in early-stage breast cancer is likely to be successful in a 300-patient, confirmatory randomized phase 3 neoadjuvant clinical trial. Design, Setting, and Participants: The I-SPY2 study is an ongoing open-label, multicenter, adaptively randomized phase 2 platform trial for high-risk, stage II/III breast cancer, evaluating multiple investigational arms in parallel. Standard NACT serves as the common control arm; investigational agent(s) are added to this backbone. Patients with ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative breast cancer were eligible for randomization to pembrolizumab between November 2015 and November 2016. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive taxane- and anthracycline-based NACT with or without pembrolizumab, followed by definitive surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR). Secondary end points were residual cancer burden (RCB) and 3-year event-free and distant recurrence-free survival. Investigational arms graduated when demonstrating an 85% predictive probability of success in a hypothetical confirmatory phase 3 trial. Results: Of the 250 women included in the final analysis, 181 were randomized to the standard NACT control group (median [range] age, 47 [24.77] years). Sixty-nine women (median [range] age, 50 [27-71] years) were randomized to 4 cycles of pembrolizumab in combination with weekly paclitaxel followed by AC; 40 hormone receptor (HR)-positive and 29 triple-negative. Pembrolizumab graduated in all 3 biomarker signatures studied. Final estimated pCR rates, evaluated in March 2017, were 44% vs 17%, 30% vs 13%, and 60% vs 22% for pembrolizumab vs control in the ERBB2-negative, HR-positive/ERBB2-negative, and triple-negative cohorts, respectively. Pembrolizumab shifted the RCB distribution to a lower disease burden for each cohort evaluated. Adverse events included immune-related endocrinopathies, notably thyroid abnormalities (13.0%) and adrenal insufficiency (8.7%). Achieving a pCR appeared predictive of long-term outcome, where patients with pCR following pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy had high event-free survival rates (93% at 3 years with 2.8 years' median follow-up). Conclusions and Relevance: When added to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pembrolizumab more than doubled the estimated pCR rates for both HR-positive/ERBB2-negative and triple-negative breast cancer, indicating that checkpoint blockade in women with early-stage, high-risk, ERBB2-negative breast cancer is highly likely to succeed in a phase 3 trial. Pembrolizumab was the first of 10 agents to graduate in the HR-positive/ERBB2-negative signature. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01042379.
Authors: Hope S Rugo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Angela DeMichele; Christina Yau; Laura J van 't Veer; Meredith B Buxton; Michael Hogarth; Nola M Hylton; Melissa Paoloni; Jane Perlmutter; W Fraser Symmans; Douglas Yee; A Jo Chien; Anne M Wallace; Henry G Kaplan; Judy C Boughey; Tufia C Haddad; Kathy S Albain; Minetta C Liu; Claudine Isaacs; Qamar J Khan; Julie E Lang; Rebecca K Viscusi; Lajos Pusztai; Stacy L Moulder; Stephen Y Chui; Kathleen A Kemmer; Anthony D Elias; Kirsten K Edmiston; David M Euhus; Barbara B Haley; Rita Nanda; Donald W Northfelt; Debasish Tripathy; William C Wood; Cheryl Ewing; Richard Schwab; Julia Lyandres; Sarah E Davis; Gillian L Hirst; Ashish Sanil; Donald A Berry; Laura J Esserman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carsten Denkert; Gunter von Minckwitz; Silvia Darb-Esfahani; Bianca Lederer; Barbara I Heppner; Karsten E Weber; Jan Budczies; Jens Huober; Frederick Klauschen; Jenny Furlanetto; Wolfgang D Schmitt; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Thomas Karn; Berit M Pfitzner; Sherko Kümmel; Knut Engels; Andreas Schneeweiss; Arndt Hartmann; Aurelia Noske; Peter A Fasching; Christian Jackisch; Marion van Mackelenbergh; Peter Sinn; Christian Schem; Claus Hanusch; Michael Untch; Sibylle Loibl Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Andrea Ravelli; Giandomenico Roviello; Daniele Cretella; Andrea Cavazzoni; Alessandra Biondi; Maria Rosa Cappelletti; Laura Zanotti; Giuseppina Ferrero; Marco Ungari; Fabrizio Zanconati; Alberto Bottini; Roberta Alfieri; Pier Giorgio Petronini; Daniele Generali Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2017-04
Authors: Hope S Rugo; Jean-Pierre Delord; Seock-Ah Im; Patrick A Ott; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Philippe L Bedard; Jasgit Sachdev; Christophe Le Tourneau; Emilie M J van Brummelen; Andrea Varga; Roberto Salgado; Sherene Loi; Sanatan Saraf; Dina Pietrangelo; Vassiliki Karantza; Antoinette R Tan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-03-20 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Annuska M Glas; Arno Floore; Leonie J M J Delahaye; Anke T Witteveen; Rob C F Pover; Niels Bakx; Jaana S T Lahti-Domenici; Tako J Bruinsma; Marc O Warmoes; René Bernards; Lodewyk F A Wessels; Laura J Van't Veer Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2006-10-30 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Paul Roepman; Hugo M Horlings; Oscar Krijgsman; Marleen Kok; Jolien M Bueno-de-Mesquita; Richard Bender; Sabine C Linn; Annuska M Glas; Marc J van de Vijver Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: W Fraser Symmans; Florentia Peintinger; Christos Hatzis; Radhika Rajan; Henry Kuerer; Vicente Valero; Lina Assad; Anna Poniecka; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Aman U Buzdar; S Eva Singletary; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marieke E M van der Noordaa; Ileana Ioan; Emiel J Rutgers; Erik van Werkhoven; Claudette E Loo; Rosie Voorthuis; Jelle Wesseling; Japke van Urk; Terry Wiersma; Vincent Dezentje; Marie-Jeanne T F D Vrancken Peeters; Frederieke H van Duijnhoven Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Sara M Tolaney; Romualdo Barroso-Sousa; Tanya Keenan; Tianyu Li; Lorenzo Trippa; Ines Vaz-Luis; Gerburg Wulf; Laura Spring; Natalie Faye Sinclair; Chelsea Andrews; Jessica Pittenger; Edward T Richardson; Deborah Dillon; Nancy U Lin; Beth Overmoyer; Ann H Partridge; Eliezer Van Allen; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Eric P Winer; Ian E Krop Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Douglas Yee; Angela M DeMichele; Christina Yau; Claudine Isaacs; W Fraser Symmans; Kathy S Albain; Yunn-Yi Chen; Gregor Krings; Shi Wei; Shuko Harada; Brian Datnow; Oluwole Fadare; Molly Klein; Stefan Pambuccian; Beiyun Chen; Kathi Adamson; Sharon Sams; Paulette Mhawech-Fauceglia; Anthony Magliocco; Mike Feldman; Mara Rendi; Husain Sattar; Jay Zeck; Idris T Ocal; Ossama Tawfik; Lauren Grasso LeBeau; Sunati Sahoo; Tuyethoa Vinh; A Jo Chien; Andres Forero-Torres; Erica Stringer-Reasor; Anne M Wallace; Lajos Pusztai; Judy C Boughey; Erin D Ellis; Anthony D Elias; Janice Lu; Julie E Lang; Hyo S Han; Amy S Clark; Rita Nanda; Donald W Northfelt; Qamar J Khan; Rebecca K Viscusi; David M Euhus; Kirsten K Edmiston; Stephen Y Chui; Kathleen Kemmer; John W Park; Minetta C Liu; Olufunmilayo Olopade; Brian Leyland-Jones; Debasish Tripathy; Stacy L Moulder; Hope S Rugo; Richard Schwab; Shelly Lo; Teresa Helsten; Heather Beckwith; Patricia Haugen; Nola M Hylton; Laura J Van't Veer; Jane Perlmutter; Michelle E Melisko; Amy Wilson; Garry Peterson; Adam L Asare; Meredith B Buxton; Melissa Paoloni; Julia L Clennell; Gillian L Hirst; Ruby Singhrao; Katherine Steeg; Jeffrey B Matthews; Smita M Asare; Ashish Sanil; Scott M Berry; Laura J Esserman; Donald A Berry Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Yuan Yuan; Jin Sun Lee; Susan E Yost; Sierra Min Li; Paul H Frankel; Christopher Ruel; Daniel Schmolze; Kim Robinson; Aileen Tang; Norma Martinez; Daphne Stewart; James Waisman; Laura Kruper; Veronica Jones; Andrea Menicucci; Sahra Uygun; Erin Yoder; Bastiaan van der Baan; John H Yim; Christina Yeon; George Somlo; Joanne Mortimer Journal: Oncologist Date: 2020-11-08