| Literature DB >> 32050695 |
Nicolas Wirtz1, André Filipovic2, Sebastian Gehlert2,3, Markus de Marées4, Thorsten Schiffer5, Wilhelm Bloch2, Lars Donath1.
Abstract
Intramuscular density of monocarboxylate-transporter (MCT) could affect the ability to perform high amounts of fast and explosive actions during a soccer game. MCTs have been proven to be essential for lactate shuttling and pH regulation during exercise and can undergo notable adaptational changes depending on training. The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence and direction of potential effects of a 7-weeks training period of jumps with superimposed whole-body electromyostimulation on soccer relevant performance surrogates and MCT density in soccer players. For this purpose, 30 amateur soccer players were randomly assigned to three groups. One group performed dynamic whole-body strength training including 3 x 10 squat jumps with WB-EMS (EG, n = 10) twice a week in addition to their daily soccer training routine. A jump training group (TG, n = 10) performed the same training routine without EMS, whereas a control group (CG, n = 8) merely performed their daily soccer routine. 2 (Time: pre vs. post) x 3 (group: EG, TG, CG) repeated measures analyses of variance (rANOVA) revealed neither a significant time, group nor interaction effect for VO2peak, Total Time to Exhaustion and Lamax as well as MCT-1 density. Due to a lack of task-specificity of the underlying training stimuli, we conclude that seven weeks of WB-EMS superimposed to jump exercise twice a week does not relevantly influence aerobic performance or MCT density.Entities:
Keywords: VO2peak; electrostimulation; lactate; monocarboxylate transporter; soccer
Year: 2020 PMID: 32050695 PMCID: PMC7037403 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17031123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Anthropometric data (mean ± SD) and Total Training Load (arbitrary units) during the 7-weeks intervention period calculated by Polar Team-2 Software according to training time spent in defined heart rates zones.
| Group | Age [Year] | Height [m] | Weight [kg] | Bodyfat [%] | relVO2peak [ml/kg*min-1] | Sessions/ | Total Training Load |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 24.4 ± 4.2 | 1.82 ± 0.03 | 81.4 ± 5.3 | 12.9 ± 2.1 | 52.1 ± 3.4 | 3.4 ± 1.2 | 3431 ± 911 |
|
| 21.1 ± 1.9 | 1.83 ± 0.06 | 79.7 ± 5.5 | 10.8 ± 2.8 | 56.3 ± 5.7 | 3.4 ± 1.3 | 3479 ± 1723 |
|
| 23.6 ± 3.9 | 1.82 ± 0.05 | 79.7 ± 7.5 | 14.1 ± 3.6 | 54.3 ± 7.2 | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 2644 ± 1437 |
Figure 1Timeline of endurance testing and muscle biopsy withdrawal during the study in the 2nd half of the season.
Figure 2Representative pictures of immunofluorescence stained myofiber cross-sections showing specific MCT-1 and MCT-4 staining (green) and type 1 myofiber staining (red) within membrane and sarcoplasmic areas of myofibers (10× fold magnification). (A) MCT-4 Posttest, (B) MCT-1 Posttest.
Figure 3(A) Relative maximum oxygen uptake (relVO2peak), (B) maximal lactate concentration, (C) maximal running time till exertion (TTE), and (D) maximal heart rate) determined at the endurance ramp-test on the treadmill in EMS-Group (EG), Training-Group (TG) and Control-Group (CG) measured before (Baseline) and after the 7 weeks intervention period (Posttest). Values are presented in means ± SD.
Figure 4MCT-4 density in type-I fiber (A) membrane and (B) cytoplasm, and in type-II fiber (C) membrane and (D) cytoplasm for EMS-Group (EG), Training-Group (TG) and Control-Group (CG) measured before (Baseline) and after the 7 weeks intervention period (Posttest). Values are presented in means ± SD.
Figure 5MCT-1 density in type-I fiber (A) membrane and (B) cytoplasm, and in type-II fiber (C) membrane and (D) cytoplasm for EMS-Group (EG), Training-Group (TG) and Control-Group (CG) measured before (Baseline) and after the 7 weeks intervention period (Posttest). Values are presented in means ± SD.